Industry-based strategies for dissemination of an evidence-based occupational sun protection program, Go Sun Smart (GSS), were tested.
Design.
Two dissemination strategies were compared in a randomized trial in 2004–2007.
Setting.
The North American ski industry.
Subjects.
Ski areas in the United States and Canada (n = 69) and their senior managers (n = 469).
Intervention.
Employers received GSS through a basic dissemination strategy (BDS) from the industry's professional association that included conference presentations and free starter kits. Half of the areas also received the enhanced dissemination strategy (EDS), in which project staff met face-to-face with managers and made ongoing contacts to support program use.
Measures.
Observation of program materials in use and managers' reports on communication about sun protection.
Analysis.
The effects of two alternative dissemination strategies were compared on program use using PROC MIXED in SAS, adjusted for covariates using one-tailed p values.
Results.
Ski areas receiving the EDS used more GSS materials (x̄ = 7.36) than those receiving the BDS (x̄ = 5.17; F = 7.82, p < .01). Managers from more areas receiving the EDS reported communicating about sun protection in employee newsletters/flyers (x̄ = .97, p = .04), in guest e-mail messages (x̄ = .75, p = .02), and on ski area Web sites (x̄ = .38, p = .02) than those receiving the BDS (x̄ = .84, .50, .15, respectively).
Conclusion.
Industry professional associations play an important role in disseminating prevention programs; however, active personal communication may be essential to ensure increased implementation fidelity.
HanrahanPFHerseyPWatsonABCallaghanTM. The effect of an educational brochure on knowledge and early detection of melanoma. Aust J Public Health.1995;19:270–274.
2.
StepanskiBMMayerJA. Solar protection behaviors among outdoor workers. J Occup Environ Med.1998;40:43–48.
3.
BroadstockMBorlandRGasonR. Effects of suntan on judgment and healthiness and attractiveness in adolescents. J Appl Soc Psychol.1992;22:157–172.
4.
GoodmanKJBibleMLLondonSMackTM. Proportional melanoma incidence and occupation among white males in Los Angeles County (California, United States). Cancer Causes Control.1995;6:451–459.
5.
RossoSZanettiRMartinezC. The multicentre south European study ‘Helios’ II: different sun exposure patterns in the aetiology of basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. Br J Cancer.1996;73:1447–1454.
6.
GellerACMillerDRLewRA. Cutaneous melanoma mortality among the socioeconomically disadvantaged in Massachusetts. Am J Public Health.1996;86:538–543.
7.
KirkpatrickCSLeeJAWhiteE. Melanoma risk by age and socio-economic status. Int J Cancer.1990;46:1–4.
8.
MarlengaB. The health beliefs and skin cancer prevention practices of Wisconsin dairy farmers. Oncol Nurs Forum.1995;22:681–686.
9.
VishvakarmanDWongJC. Description of the use of a risk estimation model to assess the increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer among outdoor workers in Central Queensland, Australia. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed.2003;19:81–88.
10.
BeralVRobinsonN. The relationship of malignant melanoma, basal and squamous skin cancers to indoor and outdoor work. Br J Cancer.1981;44:886–891.
11.
CummingsSRTrippMKHerrmannNB. Approaches to the prevention and control of skin cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev.1997;16:309–327.
12.
ElwoodJMKohHK. Etiology, epidemiology, risk factors, and public health issues of melanoma. Curr Open Oncol.1994;6:179–187.
13.
WoodwardABoffettaP. Environmental exposure, social class, and cancer risk. IARC Sci Publ.1997;138:361–367.
14.
LearJTTanBBSmithAG. A comparison of risk factors for malignant melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma in the UK. Int J Clin Pract.1998;52:145–149.
15.
FreedmanDMDosemeciMMcGlynnK. Sunlight and mortality from breast, ovarian, colon, prostate, and non-melanoma skin cancer: a composite death certificate based case-control study. Occup Environ Med.2002;59: 257–262.
16.
WeissJBertzJJungEG. Malignant melanoma in southern Germany: different predictive value of risk factors for melanoma subtypes. Dermatologica.1991;183:109–113.
17.
EspinosaASanchez HernandezJJBravoFB. Cutaneous malignant melanoma and sun exposure in Spain. Melanoma Res.1999;2:199–205.
18.
ScottMDBullerDBWalkoszBJ. Go sun smart. Commun Educ.2008;57:423–433.
19.
RigelEGLebwohlMGRigelACRigelDS. Ultraviolet radiation in alpine skiing: magnitude of exposure and importance of regular protection. Arch Dermatology.2003;139:60–62.
20.
BullerDBAndersenPAWalkoszBJ. Randomized trial testing a worksite sun protection program in an outdoor recreation industry. Health Educ Behav.2005;32:514–535.
21.
AndersenPABullerDBVoeksJH. Testing the long term effects of the Go Sun Smart worksite sun protection program: a group-randomized experimental study. J Commun.2008;68: 447–471.
22.
WalkoszBJBullerDBAndersenPA. Increasing sun protection in winter outdoor recreation: a theory-based health communication program. Am J Prev Med.2008;34:502–509.
23.
AndersenPABullerDBWalkoszBJ. Testing a theory-based health communication program: a replication of Go Sun Smart in outdoor winter recreation. J Health Commun.2009;14: 346–365.
24.
WalkoszBJVoeksJAndersenP. Randomized trial on sun safety education at ski and snowboard schools in western North America. Pediatr Dermatol.2007;24: 222–229.
25.
RogersEM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed.New York, NY: Free Press;2003.
26.
FixsenDLBlaseKANaoomSFWallaceF. Core implementation components. Res Soc Work Prac.2009;19:531–540.
27.
BeligAJBorrelliBResnickB. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH behavior change consortium. Health Psychol.2004;23:443–451.
28.
GreenhalghTRobertGMacfarlaneF. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q.2004;82:581–629.
29.
RiceRRogersEM. Re-invention in the innovation process. Knowledge.1980;1: 499–514.
30.
WhittenP. The diffusion of telemedicine. Sci Commun.1997;19:21–40.
31.
DouthwaiteBKeatingJDHParkJR. Learning selection: an evolutionary model for understanding, implementing and evaluating participatory technology development. Agric Syst.2002;72: 109–131.
32.
DearingJWLarsonRSRandallLMPopeRS. Local reinvention of the CDC HIV preventional community planning initiative. J Community Health.1998;23:113–126.
33.
DearingJWRogersEMMeyerG. Social marketing and diffusion-based strategies for communicating with unique populations: HIV prevention in San Francisco. J Health Commun.1996;1:343–363.
34.
Leonard-BartonD. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Res Policy.1988;17:251–267.
35.
DearingJWMaibachEBullerD. A convergent diffusion and social marketing approach for disseminating proven approaches to physical activity promotion. Am J Prev Med.2006;31:S11–S23.
36.
FixsenDLNaoomSFBlaseKA. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network;2005. FMHI publication #231.
37.
BrekkeKPhillipsEPancakeL. Implementation practice and implementation research: a report from the field. Res Soc Work Prac.2009;19: 592–601.
LinstoneHATuroffM. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Newark, NJ: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Information Systems Department;1975.
40.
KramerM. Uncertainty Reduction: Managing Uncertainty in Organizational Communication. Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum;2004.
EastinMS. Credibility assessments of online health information: the effects of source expertise and knowledge of content. J Comput Mediat Commun.2006;6. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00126.x.
43.
HongT. Contributing factors to the use of health-related websites. J Health Commun.2006;11:149–165.
44.
CialdiniR. Influence: Science and Practice. New York, NY: Harper Collier;1988.
45.
GrantAMDuttonJERossoS. Giving commitment: employee support programs and the prosocial sensemaking process. Acad Manage J.2008;51:898–918.
HowellJMHigginsCA. Champions of technological innovations. Adm Sci Q.1990;35:317–341.
48.
AllenVLWilderDA. Social comparison, self evaluation, and conformity to the group. In: SulsJMMillerRL, eds. Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.New York, NY: Hemisphere;1977:187–208.
49.
LomasJ. The in-between world of knowledge brokering. BMJ.2007;334: 129–132.
50.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Satellite and Information Service. Climate Atlas of the United States: Lower 48 Mean Total Sunshine Hours. Washington, DC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration;2009.
51.
BakosLWagnerMBakosRM. Sunburn, sunscreens, and phenotypes: some risk factors for cutaneous melanoma in southern Brazil. Int J Dermatol.2002;41:557–562.
52.
BullerDBAndersenPWalkoszBJ. The effect of program implementation on occupational sun protection when disseminating an evidence-based occupational sun protection program. Abstract presented at: Annual Meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine; April 30, 2011; Washington, DC.
53.
RabinBAGlasgowREKernerJF. Dissemination and implementation research on community-based cancer prevention: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med.2010;38:443–456.
54.
HarrisonTRMorganSEKingAJ. Promoting the Michigan organ donor registry: evaluating the impact of a multi-faceted intervention utilizing media priming and communication design. Health Commun.2010;25:700–708.
55.
DuttonJEAshfordSJO'NeillRMLawrenceKA. Moves that matter: issue selling and organizational change. Acad Manage J.2001;44:716–736.
56.
DuttonJEAshfordSJ. Selling issues to top management. Acad Manage Rev.1993;18: 397–428.
57.
CastroP. Applying social psychology to the study of environmental concern and environmental worldviews: contributions from the social representations approach. J Commun Appl Soc Psychol.2006;16:247–266.
58.
MorganS. The interaction of conversation, cognitions, and campaigns: the social representation of organ donation. Commun Theor.2009;19: 29–48.
