To determine the effects and mediating factors of a physical activity (PA) or vegetable and fruit (VF) group cohesion intervention.
Design.
Longitudinal design.
Setting.
Harris County and Travis County, Texas.
Participants.
Community-dwelling African-American and Hispanic or Latina women.
Intervention.
Three hundred ten women were randomized to a PA (n = 204) or VF (n = 106) intervention group. Women met in groups six times over the course of 6 months and were exposed to a group cohesion intervention to promote walking or to increase VF consumption.
Measures.
Women completed the International PA Questionnaire, National Cancer Institute VF and fat screeners, PA Group Environment Questionnaire, and 7-day accelerometer protocol at baseline and post-intervention.
Analyses.
The direct and mediated effects of the intervention on outcomes were evaluated using a mediational chain model, controlling for baseline values and covariates using path analysis.
Results.
Women were middle aged (mean = 44.4 years) and overweight or obese (mean body mass index = 34.0 kg/m2). PA increased and fat consumption decreased for both groups, whereas VF consumption increased for women in VF group only (all p <. 05). Increased task cohesion led to hypothesized increases in psychosocial factors in the PA group but not to behavioral changes.
Conclusions.
Group cohesion interventions may have psychological and physical health benefits for African-American and Hispanic or Latina women, but refinement of measures and intervention delivery is needed to determine whether hypothesized mediational pathways are valid.
McGinnisJMFoegeWH. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA.1993;270:2207–2212.
2.
MokdadAHMarksJSStroupDFGerberdingJL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA.2004;291:1238–1245.
3.
FriedenreichCM. Physical activity and cancer prevention: from observational to intervention research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.2001;10:287–301.
4.
McTiernanA. Behavioral risk factors in breast cancer: can risk be modified?Oncologist.2003;8:326–334.
5.
QuadrilateroJHoffman-GoetzL. Physical activity and colon cancer: a systematic review of potential mechanisms. J Sports Med Phys Fitness.2003;43:121–138.
6.
SlatteryMLPotterJD. Physical activity and colon cancer: confounding or interaction?Med Sci Sports Exer.2002;34:913–919.
7.
SlatteryMLEdwardsSCurtinK. Physical activity and colorectal cancer. Am J Epidemiol.2003;158:214–224.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Prevalence of fruit and vegetable consumption and physical activity by race/ethnicity: United States, 2005. MMWR.2007;56:301–304.
10.
FitzgibbonMLStolleyMSchifferL. Obesity reduction black intervention trial (ORBIT): design and baseline characteristics. J Womens Health (Larchmt).2008;17:1099–1110.
11.
Banks-WallaceJ. Emancipatory potential of storytelling in a group. Image J Nurs Sch.1998;30:17–21.
12.
ChenAHSallisJFCastroCM. A home-based behavioral intervention to promote walking in sedentary ethnic minority women: project WALK. Womens Health.1998;4:19–39.
13.
DishmanRKBuckworthJ. Increasing physical activity: a quantitative synthesis. Med Sci Sports Exerc.1996;28:706–719.
14.
US Department of Health and Human Services, Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General.Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996.
15.
BurkeSMCarronAVPattersonMM. Cohesion as shared beliefs in exercise classes. Small Gr Res.2005;36:267–288.
16.
CarronAV. Group Dynamics in Sport.London, Ontario: Spodym; 1988.
17.
EstabrooksPA. Sustaining exercise participation through group cohesion. Exerc Sport Sci Rev.2000;28:1–5.
18.
ToropainenERinneM. What are groups all about? Basic principles of group work for health-related physical activity. Patient Educ Couns.1998;33(1 suppl):S105–S109.
19.
EstabrooksPACarronAV. Group cohesion in older adult exercisers: prediction and intervention effects. J Behav Med.1999;22:575–588.
20.
van der BijAKLaurantMGWensingM. Effectiveness of physical activity interventions for older adults: a review. Am J Prev Med.2002;22:120–133.
SarnoffRHughesD. Increasing health insurance coverage in the first year of life. Matern Child Health J.2005;9:343–350.
23.
BanduraA. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control.New York, NY: WH Freeman; 1997.
24.
ShinYHurHPenderN. Exercise self-efficacy, exercise benefits and barriers, and commitment to a plan for exercise among Korean women with osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. Intl J Nurs Stud.2006;43:3–10.
MarcusBHSelbyVCNiauraRSRossiJS. Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change. Res Q Exerc Sport.1992;63:60–66.
27.
SallisJFGrossmanRMPinskiRB. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med.1987;16:825–836.
28.
PickeringTGHallJEAppelLJ. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: I. blood pressure measurement in humans—a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation.2005;111:697–716.
SjostromMBullFCraigC. Towards standardized global assessment of health-related physical activity—the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Med Sci Sports Exerc.2002;34(5):S202.
31.
CraigCLMarshallALSjostromM. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc.2003;35:1381–1395.
LayneCSMamaSKBandaJALeeRE. Development of an ecologically valid approach to assess moderate physical activity using accelerometery in community dwelling women of color: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act.2011;8:21.
34.
FrankLDSchmidTLSallisJF. Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ. Am J Prev Med.2005;28(2suppl 2):117–125.
35.
WelkGJ. Principles of design and analyses for the calibration of accelerometry-based activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc.2005;37(11 suppl):S501–S511.
36.
ThompsonFEMidthuneDSubarAF. Development and evaluation of a short instrument to estimate usual dietary intake of percentage energy from fat. J Am Diet Assoc.2007;107:760–767.
37.
ThompsonFEMidthuneDWilliamsGC. Evaluation of a short dietary assessment instrument for percentage energy from fat in an intervention study. J Nutr.2008;138:193S–199S.
38.
ThompsonFEKipnisVSubarAF. Evaluation of 2 brief instruments and a food-frequency questionnaire to estimate daily number of servings of fruit and vegetables. Am J Clin Nutr.2000;71:1503–1510.
39.
EstabrooksPA. Group integration interventions in exercise: theory, practice, and future directions. In: BeauchampMREysMA, eds. Group Dynamics in Sport and Exercise Psychology: Contemporary Themes.New York, NY: Routledge; 2008:141–156.
40.
LeeREMamaSKMedinaAV. Multiple measures of physical activity, dietary habits and weight status in African-American and Hispanic or Latina women. [published online ahead of print, April 26, 2011]. J Community Health.
41.
MacKinnonDPKrullJLLockwoodCM. Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev Sci.2000;1:173–181.
42.
MacKinnonDPLockwoodCMHoffmanJM. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods.2002;7:83–104.
43.
US Department of Health and Human Services, The 2007 HHS Poverty Guidelines.Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2007.
44.
CaperchioneCMummeryK. Psychosocial mediators of group cohesion on physical activity intention of older adults. Psychol Health Med.2007;12:81–93.
45.
FraserSNSpinkKS. Examining the role of social support and group cohesion in exercise compliance. J Behav Med.2002;25:233–249.
46.
LeeRECubbinC. Striding toward social justice: the ecologic milieu of physical activity. Exerc Sport Sci Rev.2009;37:10–17.
47.
MidtgaardJRorthMStelterRAdamsenL. The group matters: an explorative study of group cohesion and quality of life in cancer patients participating in physical exercise intervention during treatment. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl).2006;15:25–33.
48.
IngramMRuizMMayorgaMTRosalesC. The Animadora project: identifying factors related to the promotion of physical activity among Mexican-Americans with diabetes. Am J Health Promot.2009;23:396–402.
49.
SampsonRJRaudenbushSWEarlsF. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science.1997;277:918–924.
50.
ArnesonHEkbergK. Evaluation of empowerment processes in a workplace health promotion intervention based on learning in Sweden. Health Promot Int.2005;20:351–359.
51.
LipmanELWaymouthMGammonT. Influence of group cohesion on maternal well-being among participants in a support/education group program for single mothers. Am J Orthopsychiatry.2007;77:543–549.
52.
ChristensenUSchmidtLBudtz-JorgensenEAvlundK. Group cohesion and social support in exercise classes: results from a Danish intervention study. Health Educ Behav.2006;33:677–689.
53.
EstabrooksPADowneySMBurkeSM. Group Dynamics in Physical Activity Promotion: What Works.Blacksburg, Va: Virginia Tech; 2011.
54.
CarronAVSpinkKS. Team building in an exercise setting. The Sport Psychologist.1993;7:11.
55.
EstabrooksPABradshawMDzewaltowskiDASmith-RayRL. Determining the impact of Walk Kansas: applying a team-building approach to community physical activity promotion. Ann Behav Med.2008;36:1–12.
56.
KangHSFerransCEKimMJ. Aquatic exercise in older Korean women with arthritis: identifying barriers to and facilitators of long-term adherence. J Gerontol Nurs.2007;33:48–56.
57.
LougheadTMCarronAV. The mediating role of cohesion in the leader behavior-satisfaction relationship. Psychol Sport Exerc.2004;5:355–371.
58.
GrossiEDalle GraveRMannucciE. Complexity of attrition in the treatment of obesity: clues from a structured telephone interview. Int J Obes (Lond).2006;30:1132–1137.
59.
DavisMJAddisME. Predictors of attrition from behavioral medicine treatments. Ann Behav Med.1999;21:339–349.
60.
WilburJVassaloAChandlerP. Midlife women's adherence to home-based walking during maintenance. Nurs Res.2005;54:33–40.
61.
MathewNT. Prophylaxis of migraine and mixed headache: a randomized controlled study. Headache.1981;21:105–109.
62.
TurkDCRudyTE. Neglected factors in chronic pain treatment outcome studies: referral patterns, failure to enter treatment, and attrition. Pain.1990;43:7–25.
63.
ChenAHSallisJFCastroCM. A telephone and mail based intervention to promote walking in sedentary ethnic minority women: project WALKWomen Health.1998;4:19–39.
64.
LeeREMamaSKMedinaA. SALSA: saving lives staying active to promote physical activity and healthy eating. J Obes.2011;2011:436–509. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
