An Examination of the Relationship between Neighborhood Income Inequality,Social Resources,and Obesity in Los Angeles County

Abstract

Purpose.

This study examines whether local income inequality is associated with an increased likelihood of obesity among Los Angeles County residents and whether collective efficacy mediates the relationship.

Design.

A cross-sectional study of 2875 adults in 65 neighborhoods that took part in wave 1 of the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey in 2000-2001. Neighborhood measures are taken from the Los Angeles Neighborhood Services and Characteristics Database and decennial census.

Measures.

Obesity is defined as a body mass index over 30. Income inequality is operationalized with the Gini coefficient. Collective efficacy is a neighborhood-level measure comprised of aggregated responses to items that capture trust, cohesion, and the willingness to intervene for the common good among residents. Controls are included at the individual level for demographics and health characteristics, and at the neighborhood level for median household income.

Analysis.

Logistic regression models of individuals within neighborhoods.

Results.

When neighborhood economic well-being is controlled, income inequality is associated with a significant reduction in the likelihood of obesity while also controlling for individual demographic and health-related characteristics. Collective efficacy exerts an independent and beneficial effect but does not mediate the relationship between inequality and obesity.

Conclusion.

Neighborhood social resources and economic heterogeneity are associated with a lower likelihood of obesity. It may be that economically heterogeneous neighborhoods, perhaps especially in Los Angeles County, contain characteristics that promote health.

Keywords

Obesity Residence Characteristics Income Inequality Collective Efficacy Neighborhoods Prevention Research Manuscript format: research Research purpose: modeling/relationship testing Study design: secondary data analysis Outcome measure: morbidity (obesity)Setting: local community Health focus: weight control Strategy: policy,culture change Target population age: adults Target population circumstances: geographic location

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wilkinson

. Income distribution and life expectancy. Br Med J. 1992;304:165–168.

McGinnis

Foege

. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA. 1993;270:2207–2212.

Wagstaff

Van Doorslaer

. Income inequality and health: what does the literature tell us? Annu Rev Public Health. 2000; 21:543–567.

Subramanian

Kim

Kawachi

. Social trust and self-rated health in US communities: a multilevel analysis. J Urban Health. 2002;79(suppl 1):S21–S34.

Wilkinson

. Comment: income, inequality, and social cohesion. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1504–1506.

Coburn

. Income inequality, social cohesion and the health status of populations: the role of neo-liberalism. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:135–146.

Muntaner

Lynch

. Income inequality, social cohesion, and class relations: a critique of Wilkison's neo-Durkheimian research program. Int J Health Serv. 1999;29:59–81.

Jacobs

The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1961.

Wilson

. When work disappears. Pol Sci Q. 1996;111:567–595.

10.

Blakely

Lochner

Kawachi

. Metropolitan area income inequality and self-rated health—a multi-level study. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:65–77.

11.

Lopez

. Income inequality and self-rated health in US metropolitan areas: a multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:2409–2419.

12.

Kaplan

Pamuk

Lynch

. Inequality in income and mortality in the United States: analysis of mortality and potential pathways. Br Med J. 1996;312:999–1003.

13.

Kennedy

Kawachi

Glass

Prothrow-Stith

. Income distribution, socioeconomic status, and self rated health in the United States: multilevel analysis. Br Med J. 1998;317:917–921.

14.

Kennedy

Kawachi

Prothrow-Stith

. Social capital, income inequality, and firearm violent crime. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:7–17.

15.

Lynch

Smith

Harper

. Is income inequality a determinant of population health? Part 1. A systematic review. Milbank Q. 2004;82:5–99.

16.

Backlund

Rowe

Lynch

. Income inequality and mortality: a multilevel prospective study of 521 248 individuals in 50 US states. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:590–596.

17.

Ben-Shlomo

White

Marmot

. Does the variation in the socioeconomic characteristics of an area affect mortality? Br Med J. 1996; 312:1013–1014.

18.

Hou

Chen

. Neighbourhood low income, income inequality and health in Toronto. Health Rep. 2003;14:21–34.

19.

Hou

Myles

. Neighbourhood inequality, neighbourhood affluence and population health. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1557–1569.

20.

Hou

Myles

Neighbourhood Inequality, Relative Deprivation and Self-Perceived Health Status. Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada; 2004.

21.

Robert

Reither

. A multilevel analysis of race, community disadvantage, and body mass index among adults in the US. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:2421–2434.

22.

Pickett

Kelly

Brunner

. Wider income gaps, wider waistbands? An ecological study of obesity and income inequality. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:670–674.

23.

Diez-Roux

Link

Northridge

. A multilevel analysis of income inequality and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:673–687.

24.

Sampson

Raudenbush

Earls

. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997;277:918–924.

25.

Cacioppo

Patrick

Loneliness: Human Nature and the Need for Social Connection. New York, NY: WW Norton; 2008.

26.

House

Landis

Umberson

. Social relationships and health. Science. 1988;241:540–545.

27.

Curry

Latkin

Davey-Rothwell

. Pathways to depression: the impact of neighborhood violent crime on inner-city residents in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:23–30.

28.

Ross

Mirowsky

. Disorder and decay: the concept and measurement of perceived neighborhood disorder. Urban Aff Rev. 1999;34:412–432.

29.

Ross

Mirowsky

. Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health. J Health Soc Behav. 2001;42:258–276.

30.

Stafford

Chandola

Marmot

. Association between fear of crime and mental health and physical functioning. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:2076–2081.

31.

McEwen

. Stress, adaptation, and disease: allostasis and allostatic load. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;840:33–44.

32.

Cohen

Finch

Bower

Sastry

. Collective efficacy and obesity: the potential influence of social factors on health. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:769–778.

33.

Peterson

Pebley

Sastry

. The Los Angeles Neighborhood Services and Characteristics Database: codebook. Available at: http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR240.12/2007. Accessed January 31, 2010.

34.

Peterson

Sastry

Pebley

. The Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey: codebook. Available at: http://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU2400.2-1/2004. Accessed January 31, 2010.

35.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About BMI for adults. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/adult_bmi/index.html. Last updated July 27, 2009. Accessed January 31, 2010.

36.

Shryock

Siegel

Stockwell

The Methods and Materials of Demography. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 1976.

37.

Browning

Leventhal

Brooks-Gunn

. Sexual initiation in early adolescence: the nexus of parental and community control. Am Sociol Rev. 2005;70:758–778.

38.

Raudenbush

Bryk

Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications Inc; 2002.

39.

Hahn

Flood

. No insurance, public insurance, and private insurance: do these options contribute to differences in general health? J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1995; 6:41–59.

40.

Adler

Boyce

Chesney

. Socioeconomic status and health: the challenge of the gradient. Am Psychol. 2002;49:15–24.