Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Purpose.

Assess the effectiveness of the integration of vegetable demonstration videos and tasting experiences into a college nutrition course to influence students' readiness to change vegetable intake, self-efficacy for vegetable preparation, and usual vegetable intake.

Design.

Quasiexperimental, preintervention-postintervention comparisons.

Setting.

College nutrition course.

Subjects.

Of the 376 students enrolled in the course, 186 completed the online assessments (145 female, 41 male; mean age, 20 years).

Intervention.

Participants viewed online vegetable preparation videos and participated in vegetable tasting experiences that featured four target vegetables, one vegetable each month for 4 months.

Measures.

Preintervention and postintervention online surveys determined usual vegetable intake, readiness to change vegetable consumption, and self-efficacy of vegetable preparation.

Analysis.

Chi-square distribution and paired sample t-tests were used to examine differences preintervention and postintervention.

Results.

Stage of readiness to change vegetable intake shifted from contemplation toward preparation (p < .001). Self-efficacy of vegetable preparation increased and postintervention self-efficacy was associated with total and target vegetable consumption (p = .001 and p = .005, respectively). The average intake of asparagus, one of four target vegetables, increased (p = .016); similar changes were not observed for target or total vegetable consumption.

Conclusion.

Online vegetable demonstration videos may be an effective and cost-efficient intervention for increasing self-efficacy of vegetable preparation and readiness to increase vegetable consumption among college students. More research is needed to determine long-term effects on vegetable consumption.

Keywords

Vegetables Nutrition Education Young Adult Self-Efficacy Food Habits Prevention Research Manuscript format: research Research purpose: intervention testing/program evaluation Study design: quasiexperimental,pre-post Outcome measure: cognitive,behavioral Setting: school Health focus: nutrition Strategy: education,skill building/behavior change Target population age: young

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Willett

. Optimal diets for prevention of coronary heart disease. JAMA. 2002;288:2569–2578.

Hung

Joshipura

Jiang

Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of major chronic disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1577–1584.

Terry

Giovannucci

Michels

Fruit, vegetables, dietary fiber, and risk of colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:525–533.

Terry

Wolk

. Fruit and vegetable consumption in the prevention of cancer: an update. J Intern Med. 2001;250:280–290.

Brunt

Rhee

Zhong

. Differences in dietary patterns among college students according to body mass index. J Am Coll Health. 2008;56:629–634.

Nebeling

Yaroch

Seymour

Kimmons

. Still not enough: can we achieve our goals for Americans to eat more fruits and vegetables in the future? Am J Prev Med. 2007; 32:354–355.

Casagrande

Wang

Anderson

Gary

. Have Americans increased their fruit and vegetable intake? The trends between 1988 and 2002. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:257–263.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Fruit and vegetable consumption among adults—United States, 2005. MMWR. 2007;56:213–217.

National College Health Assessment II Reference Group Executive Summary Fall 2008. Linthicum, Md: National American College Health Association American College Health Association; 2009.

10.

Caine-Bish

. Effect of nutrition intervention using a general nutrition course for promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among college students. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009;41:103–109.

11.

Soliah

Walter

Antosh

. Quantifying the impact of food preparation skills among college women. Coll Stud J. 2006;729–739.

12.

Reinaerts

de Nooijer

Candel

de Vries

. Explaining school children's fruit and vegetable consumption: the contributions of availability, accessibility, exposure, parental consumption and habit in addition to psychosocial factors. Appetite. 2007;48:248–258.

13.

Beydoun

Wang

. Do nutrition knowledge and beliefs modify the association of socio-economic factors and diet quality among US adults? Prev Med. 2008; 46:145–153.

14.

Prochaska

Velicer

Rossi

Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychol. 1994;13:39–46.

15.

Hildebrand

Betts

. Assessment of stage of change, decisional balance, self-efficacy, and use of processes of change of low-income parents for increasing servings of fruits and vegetables to preschool-aged children. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009;41:110–119.

16.

Richards

Kattelmann

Ren

. Motivating 18- to 24-year-olds to increase their fruit and vegetable consumption. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:1405–1411.

17.

ESHA Research, The Food Processor SQL. Salem, Ore, 2005.

18.

Betts

Horacek

. Measuring stage of change for assessing readiness to increase fruit and vegetable intake among 18- to 24-year-olds. Am J Health Promot. 2001;16:88–97.

19.

Finckenor

Byrd-Bredbenner

. Nutrition intervention group program based on preaction-stage-oriented change processes of the transtheoretical model promotes long-term reduction in dietary fat intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100:335–342.

20.

Greene

Rossi

Reed

Stages of change for reducing dietary fat to 30% of energy or less. J Am Diet Assoc. 1994;94:1105–1110.

21.

US Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Agriculture, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2005. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2005.

22.

Betts

Horacek

The importance of decisional balance and self-efficacy in relation to stages of change for fruit and vegetable intakes by young adults. Am J Health Promot. 2002;16:157–166.

23.

Deshmukh-Taskar

Nicklas

Yang

Berenson

. Does food group consumption vary by differences in socioeconomic, demographic, and lifestyle factors in young adults? The Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:223–234.

24.

Larson

Perry

Story

Neumark-Sztainer

. Food preparation by young adults is associated with better diet quality. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:2001–2007.

25.

Skinner

. Change in students' dietary behavior during a college nutrition course. J Nutr Educ. 1991;23:72–75.

26.

Oliveira Mdo

Anderson

Auld

Kendall

. Validation of a tool to measure processes of change for fruit and vegetable consumption among male college students. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2005;37:2–11.

27.

Di Noia

Schinke

Prochaska

Contento

. Application of the transtheoretical model to fruit and vegetable consumption among economically disadvantaged African-American adolescents: preliminary findings. Am J Health Promot. 2006;20:342–348.

28.

Velicer

Rossi

Diclemente

Prochaska

. A criterion measurement model for health behavior change. Addict Behav. 1996;21:555–584.

29.

Shaikh

Yaroch

Nebeling

Psychosocial predictors of fruit and vegetable consumption in adults a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34:535–543.

30.

Strachan

Brawley

. Healthy-eater identity and self-efficacy predict healthy eating behavior: a prospective view. J Health Psychol. 2009;14:684–695.

31.

Matvienko

Lewis

Schafer

. A college nutrition science course as an intervention to prevent weight gain in female college freshmen. J Nutr Educ. 2001;33:95–101.

32.

Larson

Nelson

Neumark-Sztainer

Making time for meals: meal structure and associations with dietary intake in young adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:72–79.

Increased Self-Efficacy for Vegetable Preparation following an Online,Skill-Based Intervention and In-Class Tasting Experience as a Part of a General Education College Nutrition Course

Abstract

Purpose.

Design.

Setting.

Subjects.

Intervention.

Measures.

Analysis.

Results.

Conclusion.

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References