Developing and Testing the CHORDS: Characteristics of Responsible Drinking Survey

Abstract

Purpose.

Report on the development and psychometric testing of a theoretically and evidence-grounded instrument, the Characteristics of Responsible Drinking Survey (CHORDS).

Design.

Instrument subjected to four phases of pretesting (cognitive validity, cognitive and motivational qualities, pilot test, and item evaluation) and a final posttest implementation.

Setting.

Large public university in Texas.

Subjects.

Randomly selected convenience sample (n = 729) of currently enrolled students.

Measures.

This 78-item questionnaire measures individuals' responsible drinking beliefs, motivations, intentions, and behaviors. Cronbach α, split-half reliability, principal components analysis and Spearman ρ were conducted to investigate reliability, stability, and validity.

Results.

Measures in the CHORDS exhibited high internal consistency reliability and strong correlations of split-half reliability. Factor analyses indicated five distinct scales were present, as proposed in the theoretical model. Subscale composite scores also exhibited a correlation to alcohol consumption behaviors, indicating concurrent validity.

Conclusions.

The CHORDS represents the first instrument specifically designed to assess responsible drinking beliefs and behaviors. It was found to elicit valid and reliable data among a college student sample. This instrument holds much promise for practitioners who desire to empirically investigate dimensions of responsible drinking.

Keywords

Alcohol Responsible Drinking Instrument Scale Development Psychometric Prevention Research Manuscript format: research Research purpose: instrument development Study design: nonexperimental,survey research Outcome measure: cognitive,behavioral Setting: school Health focus: substance abuse Strategy: education Target population: youth,adults Target population circumstances: geographic location,race/ethnicity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sanders

. Alcohol advertisements do not encourage alcohol abuse among teens. In: Leone

Szumski

Koster

Wekesser

, eds. Alcoholism. San Diego, Calif: Greenhaven Press Inc; 1994:132–133.

Agostinelli

Grube

. Alcohol counter-advertising and the media: a review of recent research. Alcohol Res Health. 2002;26:15–21.

Mosher

. Alcohol advertising and public health: an urgent call to action. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:180–181.

Grube

Wallack

. Television beer advertising and drinking knowledge, beliefs, and intentions among school children. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:254–259.

Saffer

. Alcohol advertising and youth. J Stud Alcohol. 2002;63:173–179.

Wyllie

Zhang

Casswell

. Responses to televised alcohol advertisements associated with drinking behaviour of 10-17-year-olds. Addiction. 1998;93:361–371.

Anheuser-Busch, Responsibility matters. Consumer awareness and education. Available at: http://www.beeresponsible.com/home.html. Accessed June 28, 2007.

Miller Brewing Co, Live responsibly. Available at: http://www.millerbrewing.com/liveresponsibly/index.asp. Accessed June 28, 2007.

Coors Brewing Co, Responsibility in marketing. Doing our part. Available at: http://www.coors.com/part_resp_marketing.asp. Accessed June 28, 2007.

10.

Elliott

. A web awash in liquor ads, promoting moderation. New York Times. March 9, 2009;B7.

11.

Atkin

Smith

Bang

. How young viewers respond to televised drinking and driving messages. Alcohol Drugs Driving. 1994;10:263–275.

12.

McCreanor

Casswell

Hill

. ICAP and the perils of partnership. Addiction. 2000;95:179–185.

13.

Smith

Atkin

Roznowski

. Are “drink responsibly” alcohol campaigns strategically ambiguous? Health Commun. 2006; 20:1–11.

14.

Wolburg

. How responsible are “responsible” drinking campaigns for preventing alcohol abuse? J Consum Mark. 2005; 22:176–177.

15.

Anheuser-Busch, Americans support beer industry's responsibility efforts. Available at: http://www.alcoholstats.com/mm/docs/2037.pdf. Accessed June 28, 2007.

16.

Dejong

Atkin

Wallack

. A critical analysis of “moderation” advertising sponsored by the beer industry: Are “responsible drinking” commercials done responsibly? Milbank Q. 1992; 70:661–677.

17.

Barry

Goodson

. Use (and misuse) of the responsible drinking message in public health and alcohol advertising: a review. Health Behav. 2010;37(2):288–303.

18.

Barry

. Examining College Students' Beliefs and Behaviors Regarding Responsible Alcohol Consumption [dissertation]. College Station, Tex: Texas A&M University; 2007.

19.

Fishbein

Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement. New York, NY: Wiley; 1967.

20.

Ajzen

. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.

21.

Montano

Kasprzyk

. The theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. In: Glanz

Rimer

Lewis

, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2002:67–98.

22.

Baranowski

Perry

Parcel

. How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact. In: Glanz

Rimer

Lewis

, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2002:165–184.

23.

Bandura

Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: WH Freeman & Co; 1997.

24.

Dillman

Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2007.

25.

O'Rourke

. The ordering and wording of questionnaire items: Part 1. Am J Health Stud. 2001;17:156–159.

26.

American College Health Association, The American College Health Associations National College Health Assessment (ACHA-NCHA), spring 2003 reference group report. J Am Coll Health. 2005;53:199–210.

27.

DeVellis

Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2003.

28.

Tabachnick

Fidell

Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed. Boston, Mass: Pearson Education; 2007.

29.

Buhi

Goodson

Neilands

. Out of sight, not out of mind: strategies for handling missing data in health behavior research. Am J Health Behav. 2008;32:83–92.

30.

Thompson

Score Reliability: Contemporary Thinking on Reliability Issues. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2003.

31.

Huck

Reading Statistics and Research. 4th ed. Boston, Mass: Pearson Education; 2004.

32.

Stevens

Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1986.

33.

Thompson

Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004.

34.

Comrey

Lee

A First Course in Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992.

35.

Gorsuch

Factor Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1983.