Storefront Cigarette Advertising Differs by Community Demographic Profile

Abstract

Purpose.

Tobacco manufacturers have targeted youth and ethnic/racial minorities with tailored advertising. Less is known about how characteristics of storefront tobacco advertisements, such as location, position, size, and content, are used to appeal to demographic subgroups.

Design.

The occurrence and characteristics of storefront cigarette advertising were observed for all licensed tobacco retailers in two defined communities.

Setting.

Measures were taken in two Boston, Massachusetts, area urban communities: a low-income, minority community and a high-income, nonminority community.

Subjects.

No human subjects were involved in this study.

Measures.

Advertisement position (attached or separated from storefront), size (small, medium, or large), mentholation, and price were recorded. Geographic coordinates of tobacco retailers and schools were mapped using ArcGIS 9.2.

Analysis.

Differences between the communities in advertisement number and characteristics were assessed using bivariate analyses. Logistic regression was used to ascertain the odds of specific advertising features occurring in the low-income/minority community.

Results.

The low-income/minority community had more tobacco retailers, and advertisements were more likely to be larger, promote menthol products, have a lower mean advertised price, and occur within 1000 feet of a school.

Conclusion.

Storefront cigarette advertising characteristics that increase exposure and promote youth initiation were more prominent in a low-income/minority community. The findings emphasize the need for more effective regulation of storefront tobacco advertising.

Keywords

Tobacco Health Disparities Youth Advertising Prevention Research Manuscript format: research Research purpose: descriptive Study design: quasi-experimental Outcome measure: tobacco industry messaging Setting: local community Health focus: smoking control Strategy: policy Target population age: youth Target population circumstances: education/income level race/ethnicity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Rockville, Md: Office of Applied Studies; 2007. NSDUH Series H-27, DHHS publication SMA 05-4061.

Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health; 1994.

DiFranza

Wellman

Sargent

. Tobacco promotion and the initiation of tobacco use: Assessing the evidence for causality. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1237–1248.

Donovan

Jancey

Jones

. Tobacco point of sale advertising increases positive brand user imagery. Tob Control. 2002;11:191–194.

Henriksen

Feighery

Wang

Fortmann

. Association of retail tobacco marketing with adolescent smoking. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:2081–2083.

Biener

Siegel

. Tobacco marketing and adolescent smoking: More support for a causal inference. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:407–411.

Comparison of the cigarette brand preferences of adult and teenaged smokers—United States, 1989, and 10 U. S. communities, 1988 and 1990. MMWR. 1992;41:169–173, 179–181.

Glanz

Sutton

Arriola

KRJ

. Operation storefront Hawaii: Tobacco advertising and promotion in Hawaii stores. J Health Commun. 2006;11:699–707.

National Association of Attorneys General: Project Tobacco. Master Settlement Agreement. Available at: http://www.naag.org/backpages/naag/tobacco/msa/msa-pdf/1109185724_1032468605_cigmsa.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2009.

10.

Celebucki

Diskin

. A longitudinal study of externally visible cigarette advertising on retail storefronts in Massachusetts before and after the Master Settlement Agreement. Tob Control. 2002;11(suppl 2):ii47–ii53.

11.

Wakefield

Terry-McElrath

Chaloupka

. Tobacco industry marketing at point of purchase after the 1998 MSA billboard advertising ban. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:937–940.

12.

Cummings

Morley

Horan

. Marketing to America's youth: Evidence from corporate documents. Tob Control. 2002;11(suppl 1):I5–I17.

13.

Balbach

Gasior

Barbeau

. RJ. Reynolds' targeting of African Americans: 1988–2000. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:822–827.

14.

Gardiner

. The African Americanization of menthol cigarette use in the United States. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6(suppl 1): S55–S65.

15.

Feighery

Schleicher

Cruz

T Boley

Unger

. An examination of trends in amount and type of cigarette advertising and sales promotions in California stores, 2002–2005. Tob Control. 2008;17:93–98.

16.

Pucci

Joseph

Jr Siegel

. Outdoor tobacco advertising in six Boston neighborhoods. Evaluating youth exposure. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15: 155–159.

17.

US Bureau of the Census. Census 2000 Brief. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/c2kbr01-12.pdf. Accessed June 29, 2009.

18.

Hersey

Nonnemaker

. Are menthol cigarettes a starter product for youth? Nicotine Tob Res. 2006;8: 403–413.

19.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Cigarette Smoking Among Adults—United States, 2002. MMWR. 2004;53:427–431.

20.

Massachusetts Department of Public Health. Massachusetts Operation Storefront—1998. http://www.mass.gov/Eeohhs2/docs/dph/tobacco_control/operation_storefront.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2009.

21.

Chaloupka

. Macro-social influences: The effects of prices and tobacco-control policies on the demand for tobacco products. Nicotine Tob Res. 1999;1(suppl 1):S105–S109.

22.

Jason

Pokorny

Mikulski

Schoeny

. Assessing storefront tobacco advertising after the billboard ban. Eval Health Prof. 2004;27:22–33.

23.

Ruel

Mani

Sandoval

. After the Master Settlement Agreement: Trends in the American tobacco retail environment from 1999 to 2002. Health Promot Pract. 2004;5(3 suppl):99S–110S.

24.

US Bureau of the Census. American Fact Finder, 2000. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/. Accessed June 30, 2009.

25.

Tobacco use among U. S. racial/ethnic minority groups—African Americans, American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, Hispanics. A report of the Surgeon General. Executive summary. MMWR. 1998;47(RR-18):v–xv, 1–16.

26.

Luke

Esmundo

Bloom

. Smoke signs: Patterns of tobacco billboard advertising in a metropolitan region. Tob Control. 2000;9:16–23.

27.

Stoddard

Johnson

Sussman

. Tailoring outdoor tobacco advertising to minorities in Los Angeles County. J Health Commun. 1998;3:137–146.

28.

Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Available at: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=11l_cong_bills&docid=f:h1256enr.txt.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2009.