KrahnG. Changing concepts in health, wellness and disability. In: Institute on Disability & Development, ed. Proceedings of Changing Concepts of Health and Disability: State of the Science Conference and Policy Forum.Portland, Ore: Oregon Health & Science University; 2003.
2.
US Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Improve the Health and Wellness of Persons With Disabilities.Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2005.
3.
DrumCEHorner-JohnsonWKrahnGL. Self-rated health and healthy days: examining the “disability paradox.”Disabil Health J.2008;1(2):71–78.
4.
CampbellMLSheetsDStrongPS. Secondary health conditions among middle-aged individuals with chronic physical disabilities: implications for unmet needs for services. Assist Technol.1999;11(2):105–122.
5.
HavercampSMScandlinDRothM. Health disparities among adults with developmental disabilities, adults with other disabilities, and adults not reporting disability in North Carolina. Public Health Rep.2004;119:418–426.
6.
LennoxNGBeangeHEdwardsNS. The health needs of people with intellectual disability. Med J Aust.2000;173(6):328–330.
7.
TurkMAScandaleJRosenbaumPFWeberRJ. The health of women with cerebral palsy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am.2001;12(1):153–168.
8.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010.Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2001.
9.
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. A Plan to Eliminate Craniofacial, Oral, and Dental Health Disparities.Bethesda, Md: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; 2002.
10.
McDermottSPlattT. The health of adults with disability in family practice: 1990–2003. Paper presented at: The Conference of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities; July 28, 2004; Washington, DC.
11.
NosekMHowlandCRintalaD. National study of women with physical disabilities: final report. Sex Disabil.2001;19(1):5–40.
12.
ChevarleyFMThierryJMGillCJ. Health, preventive health care, and health care access among women with disabilities in the 1994–1995 National Health Interview Survey, Supplement on Disability. Womens Health Issues.2006;16(6):297–312.
13.
DownsAWileNKrahnG. Wellness promotion in persons with disabilities: physicians’ personal behaviors, attitudes and practices. Rehabil Psychol.2004;49 (4):303–308.
14.
RimmerJHRileyBWangBRauworthA. Accessibility of health clubs for people with mobility disabilities and visual impairments. Am J Public Health.2005;95:2022–2028.
15.
RimmerJHRileyBWangE. Physical activity participation among persons with disabilities: barriers and facilitators. Am J Prev Med.2004;26:419–425.
16.
AbdullahNHorner-JohnsonWDrumCE. Healthy Lifestyles for People With Disabilities. Calif J Health Prom.2004;2 (special issue: Oregon):41–53.
17.
HellerTMarksBAAileySH. Exercise and Nutrition Health Education Curriculum for Adults With Developmental Disabilities.Chicago: Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Aging and Developmental Disabilities, Department of Disability and Human Development, University of Illinois at Chicago; 2001.
18.
RaveslootCSeekinsTWhiteG. Living Well With a Disability health promotion intervention: improved health status for consumers and lower costs for health care policymakers. Rehabil Psychol.2005;50:239–245.
19.
CardinalBJSpazianiMD. ADA compliance and the accessibility of physical activity facilities in western Oregon. Am J Health Promot.2003;17(3):197–201.
20.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Guide to Community Preventive Services. Available at: http://www.thecommunityguide.org/. Accessed December 30, 2008.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices. Available at: http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/. Accessed December 30, 2008.
23.
US Department of Education. What Works Clearinghouse. Available at: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/. Accessed December 30, 2008.
24.
GlasgowREKlesgesLMDzewaltowskiDA. The future of health behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?Ann Behav Med.2004;27(1):3–12.
25.
North Carolina Office on Disability and Health & Massachusetts Office on Health and Disability. The health promotion resource guide: promoting the health and wellness of people with disabilities. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, North Carolina Office on Disability and Health: 2003.
26.
RimmerJH. Health promotion for people with disabilities: the emerging paradigm shift from disability prevention to prevention of secondary conditions. Phys Ther.1999;79:495–502.
27.
SeekinsTKimptonT. Evidence-based health promotion interventions for people with disabilities: results of a systematic review of the literature. Paper presented at: Health, Wellness, and Disability; May 9, 2008; Portland, Ore.
28.
KosmaMCardinalBJRintalaP. Motivating individuals with disabilities to be physically active. Quest.2002;54:116–132.
29.
DelbeqAvan de VenAGustafsonD. Group Techniques: A Guide to Nominal and Delphi Processes.Glenview, Ill: Scott Foresman; 1975.
30.
FinkAKosecoffJChassinMBrookRH. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health.1984;74:979–983.
31.
de VilliersMRde VilliersPJTKentAP. The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teacher.2005;27:639–643.
32.
JonesJHunterD. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ.1995;311(7001):376–380.
HochbaumGMSorensonJRLorigK. Theory in health education practice. Health Educ Q.1992;19(3):295–313.
35.
GlanzKRimerBKLewisFM, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 3rd ed. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
36.
DrumCEKrahnGCulleyC. Recognizing and responding to the health disparities of people with disabilities. Calif J Health Promot.2005;3(3):29–42.
37.
KosmaMCardinalBJMcCubbinJA. A pilot study of a web-based physical activity motivational program for adults with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil.2005;27:1435–1442.
38.
RimmerJH. Use of the ICF in identifying factors that impact participation in physical activity/rehabilitation among people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil.2006;28:1087–1095.
39.
RossiPFreemanH. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach.Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1993.
40.
ValenteT. Evaluating Health Promotion Programs.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2002.
41.
Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep.1999;48(RR-11):1–40.
42.
PattonMQ. Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text.Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1997.
43.
TrochimW. The Research Methods Knowledge Base.Cincinnati, Ohio: Atomic Dog Publishing; 2000.
44.
WareJEJrKosinskiMGandekB. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide.Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Inc; 2000.
45.
AndresenEMMeyersAR. Health-related quality of life outcomes measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2000;81:30–45.
46.
LeducBELepageY. Health-related quality of life after spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil.2002;24(4):196–202.
47.
LutherSLKromreyJPowell-CopeG. A pilot study to modify the SF-36V physical functioning scale for use with veterans with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2006;87(8):1059–1066.
48.
Froelich-GrobeKAndresenEMCaburnayC. Measuring health-related quality of life for persons with physical disabilities: an enabled version of the Short-Form 36 (SF-36E). Qual Life Res.2008;17:751–770.
49.
KatapodiMCDoddMJLeeKAFacioneNCM. Underestimation of breast cancer risk: influence on screening behavior. Oncol Nurs Forum.2009;36:306–314.
50.
AldanaSGPronkNP. Health promotion programs, modifiable health risks, and employee absenteeism. J Occup Environ Med.2001;43:36–46.
51.
RhodesTCusickL. Accounting for unprotected sex: stories of agency and acceptability. Soc Sci Med.2002;55:211–226.
52.
World Health Organization. Jakarta Declaration on Leading Health Promotion Into the 21st Century.Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1997.
53.
SymeSL. Social determinants of health: the community as an empowered partner. Prev Chronic Dis.2004;1(1):A02.
54.
JewkesRMurcottA. Community representatives: representing the “community”?Soc Sci Med.1998;46(7):843–858.
55.
HibbardJHStockardJMahoneyERTuslerM. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res.2004;34:1005–1026.
56.
FawcettSBWhiteGWBalcazarFE. A contextual-behavioral model of empowerment: case studies involving people with physical disabilities. Am J Community Psychol.1994;22(4):471–496.
57.
RaveslootCHSeekinsTCahillT. Health promotion for people with disabilities: development and evaluation of the Living Well With a Disability program. Health Educ Res.2007;22(4):522–531.
58.
WhiteGWSuchowierskaMCampbellM. Developing and systematically implementing participatory action research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2004;85(4)(suppl 2):S3–S12.
59.
YanceyAKOryMGDavisSM. Dissemination of physical activity promotion interventions in underserved populations. Am J Prev Med.2006;31(4)(suppl):S82–S91.
60.
BetancourtJRGreenARCarrilloJE. Cultural competence in health care: emerging frameworks and practical approaches. Available at: http://www.azdhs.gov/bhs/cchc.pdf. Accessed December 30, 2008.
61.
BrachCFraserI. Can cultural competency reduce racial and ethnic disparities? a review and conceptual model. Med Care Res Rev.2000;57:181–217.
62.
BrownSE. What is disability culture?Disabil Stud Q.2000;22:34–50.
63.
CampbellJF. The consumer movement and implications for vocational rehabilitation services. J Vocat Rehabil.1991;1:67–75.
64.
FineMAschA, eds. Women With Disabilities: Essays in Psychology, Culture, and Politics.Philadelphia, Pa: Temple University Press; 1988.
65.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Closing the Gap: A National Blueprint to Improve the Health of Persons With Mental Retardation.Washington DC: Office of the Surgeon General, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2002.
66.
O'DayBDautelPScheerJ. Barriers to healthcare for people with mobility impairments. Manag Care Q.2002;10(3):41–51.
67.
Tuffrey-WijneI. Palliative care and learning disabilities. Nurs Times.1997;93:50–51.
68.
Institute of Medicine. Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion.Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
69.
EmersonEHattonC. Contribution of socioeconomic position to health inequalities of British children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Am J Ment Retard.2007;112(2): 140–150.
70.
FujiuraGTYamakiK. Trends in demography of childhood poverty and disability. Except Child.2000;66:187–199.
71.
MinklerMFuller-ThompsonEGuralnikJM. Gradient of disability across the socioeconomic spectrum in the United States. N Engl J Med.2006;355:695–703.
72.
SchoeniRFMartinLGAndreskiPMFreedmanVA. Persistent and growing socioeconomic disparities in disability among the elderly: 1982–2002. Am J Public Health.2005;95(11):2065–2070.
73.
SmithDMLangaKMKabetoMUUbelPA. Health, wealth and happiness: financial resources buffer subjective well-being after the onset of a disability. Psychol Sci.2005;16:663–666.
74.
BarbeauEKriegerNSoobaderM. Working class matters: socioeconomic disadvantage, race/ethnicity, gender and smoking in the National Health Interview Survey, 2000. Am J Public Health.2004;94:230–239.
75.
LynchJWKaplanGASalonenJT. Why do poor people behave poorly? variation in adult health behaviours and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic lifecourse. Soc Sci Med.1997;44(6):809–819.
76.
National Health Services. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness: CRD's Guidance for Those Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews. 2nd ed. York, England: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York; 2001. CRD report 4.
TeutschSMBergerML. Evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision making: related but distinct processes. Med Decis Making.2005;25:487–489.
79.
BalasEABorenSA. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. In: van BemmelJHMcCrayAT, eds. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2000: Patient-Centered Systems.Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer; 2000:65–70.
80.
DavisDEvansMJadadA. The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ.2003;327:33–35.
81.
GrolRGrimshawJ. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet.2003;362:1225–1230.
82.
GrolRJonesR. Twenty years of implementation research. Fam Pract.2000;17:S32–S35.
83.
KernerJF. Knowledge translation versus knowledge integration: a “funder's” perspective. J Contin Educ Health Prof.2006;26:72–80.
84.
LavisJDaviesHOxmanA. Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Pol.2005;10:35–48.