This study examined correlates of park-based physical activity (PA) among children in neighborhood parks.
Design.
Direct observation was used to assess PA among children.
Setting.
Public parks in Tampa, Florida (n = 10), and Chicago, Illinois (n = 18), from low income and high income and racially/ethnically diverse communities.
Subjects.
Children (n = 3410), coded as anyone who appeared to be 10 years or younger, observed at parks in Tampa and Chicago.
Measures.
Physical activity was measured by a modified version of the System for Observing Play and Leisure Among Youth (SOPLAY).
Analysis.
Descriptive statistics and multilevel regression models were used in data analysis.
Results.
At the activity observation level, children's PA was positively related to temperature and unstructured activities in Tampa and Chicago parks. Among park activity area predictors, type of activity area was significantly related to PA. In Tampa, more PA was observed on courts, and less PA was observed in shelter areas compared with open space areas. In Chicago, less PA was observed on courts and fields compared with open space areas. Neighborhood income was associated with lower PA in Tampa parks. Neighborhood race/ethnicity was not a significant predictor of children's PA in either city.
Conclusions.
Children's PA was linked to modifiable social and environmental features within parks. Strategies to increase PA among children in parks should promote courts, playgrounds, informal activities, and free play. (Am J Health Promot 2011;25[5]:e1-e9.)
BlairSNBrodneyS. Effects of physical inactivity and obesity on morbidity and mortality: Current evidence and research issues. Med Sci Sports Exerc.1999;31:S646–S662.
2.
DeLanyJPBrayGAHarshaDWVolaufovaJ. Energy expenditure in preadolescent African-American and Caucasian boys and girls: The Baton Rouge Children's Study. Am J Clin Nutr.2002;75:705–713.
3.
PowellLMSlaterSChaloupkaFJ. The relationship between community physical activity settings and race, ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Evidence-Based Prev Med.2004;1:135–144.
4.
PowellLMSlaterSChaloupkaFJHarperD. Availability of physical activity-related facilities and neighborhood demographic and socioeconomic characteristics: A national study. Am J Public Health.2006;96:1676–1680.
5.
PowellLMChaloupkaFJSlaterSJThe availability of local-area commercial physical activity-related facilities and physical activity among adolescents. Am J Prev Med.2007;33:S292–S300.
6.
HallalPCAzevedoMRReichertFFWho, when, and how much? Epidemiology of walking in a middle-income country. Am J Prev Med.2005;28:156–161.
7.
KearneyJMde GraafCDamkjaerSEngstromLM. Stages of change towards physical activity in a nationally representative sample in the European Union. Public Health Nutr.1999;2:115–124.
8.
TaylorWCBaranowskiTYoungDR. Physical activity interventions in low-income, ethnic minority and populations with disability. Am J Prev Med.1998;15:334–343.
9.
BurgoyneLNWoodsCColemanRPerryIJ. Neighbourhood perceptions of physical activity: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health.2008;8:101–110.
10.
Gordon-LarsenPMcMurrayRGPopkinBM. Determinants of adolescent physical activity and inactivity patterns. Pediatrics.2000;105:E83.
11.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Strategies for reducing morbidity and mortality from diabetes through health-care system interventions and diabetes self-management education in community settings: A report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. MMWR Recomm Rep.2001;50(RR–16):1–15.
12.
TuckerPGillilandJIrwinJ. Splashpads, swings, and shade: Parents' preferences for neighbourhood parks. Can J Public Health.2007;98:198–202.
13.
GodbeyGCCaldwellLLFloydMPayneLL. Contributions of leisure studies and recreation and park management research to the active living agenda. Am J Prev Med.2005;28:150–158.
14.
MoodyJSProchaskaJJSallisJFViability of parks and recreation centers as sites for youth physical activity promotion. Health Promot Pract.2004;5:438–443.
15.
SallisJFGlanzK. The role of built environments in physical activity, eating, and obesity in childhood. Future Child.2006;16:89–108.
16.
SallisJFCerveroRBAscherWAn ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health.2006;27:297–322.
17.
HoltNLSpenceJCSehnZLCutumisuN. Neighborhood and developmental differences in children's perceptions of opportunities for play and physical activity. Health Place.2008;14:2–14.
18.
SpenceJCCutumisuNEdwardsJEvansJ. Influence of neighbourhood design and access to facilities on overweight and obesity among preschool children. Int J Pediatr Obes.2008;3:109–116.
19.
CohenDAMcKenzieTLSehgalAContribution of public parks to physical activity. Am J Public Health.2007;97:509–514.
20.
CohenDAAshwoodJSScottMMPublic parks and physical activity among adolescent girls. Pediatrics.2006;118:e1381–e1389.
21.
FloydMFSpenglerJOMaddockJEPark-based physical activity in diverse communities in two U.S. cities: An observational study. Am J Prev Med.2008;34:299–305.
22.
TimperioACrawfordDTelfordASalmonJ. Perceptions about the local neighborhood and walking and cycling among children. Prev Med.2004;38:39–47.
23.
MotaJAlmeidaMSantosPRibeiroJC. Perceived neighborhood environments and physical activity in adolescents. Prev Med.2005;41:834–836.
24.
GomezJEJohnsonBASelvaMSallisJF. Violent crime and outdoor physical activity among inner-city youth. Prev Med.2004;39:876–881.
25.
CarverASalmonJCampbellKHow do perceptions of local neighborhood relate to adolescents' walking and cycling?Amer J Health Promot.2005;20:139–147.
26.
TuckerPIrwinJDGillilandJEnvironmental influences on physical activity levels in youth. Health Place.2009;15:357–363.
27.
RomeroAJ. Low-income neighborhood barriers and resources for adolescents' physical activity. J Adolesc Health.2005;36:253–259.
28.
NormanGJNutterSKRyanSCommunity design and access to recreational facilities as correlates of adolescent physical activity and body-mass index. J Phys Activity Health.2006;3:s118–s128.
29.
KligermanMSallisJFRyanSAssociation of neighborhood design and recreation environment variables with physical activity and body mass index in adolescents. Am J Health Promot.2007;21:274–277.
30.
DavidsonKKLawsonCT. Do attributes of the physical environment influence children's level of physical activity?Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act.2006; 3:1–17.
31.
KaczynskiATHendersonKA. Environmental correlates of physical activity: A review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leisure Sci.2007;29:315–354.
McKenzieTLCohenDASehgalASystem for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and feasibility measures. J Phys Activity Health.2006;3:S208–S222.
34.
ScruggsPWBeveridgeSKEisenmanPAQuantifying physical activity via pedometry in elementary physical education. Med Sci Sports Exerc.2003;35:1065–1071.
35.
RowePJvan der MarsHSchuldheiszJMFoxSD. Measuring students' physical activity levels: Validating SOFIT for use with high school students. J Teaching Phys Educ.2004;23:235–251.
36.
LandisJRKochGG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics.1977;33:159–174.
37.
JargowskiPBanesM. Ghetto poverty in the United States. In: JenksCPetersonP, eds. The Urban Underclass.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1991:235–273.
38.
KaczynskiATHendersonKA. Parks and recreation settings and active living: A review of associations with physical activity function and intensity. J Phys Activity Health.2008;5:619–632.
39.
RoemmichJNEpsteinLHRajaSAssociation of access to parks and recreational facilities with the physical activity of young children. Prev Med.2006;43:437–441.
40.
RiesAVVoorheesCCRocheKMA quantitative examination of park characteristics related to park use and physical activity among urban youth. J Adolesc Health.2009;45:S64–S70.
41.
CraddockAKawachiIColditzG. Playground safety and access in Boston neighborhoods. Am J Prev Med.2005;28:357–363.
42.
MooreRCCooperMC. Healthy planet, health children: Designing nature into the daily spaces of childhood. In: KellertSRHeerwagenJHMadorML, eds. Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life.New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2008:153–203.
43.
ShoresKAWestST. The relationship between built park environments and physical activity in four park locations. J Public Health Manag Pract.2008;14:e9–e16.
44.
FloydMFSpenglerJOMaddockJEEnvironmental and social correlates of physical activity in neighborhood parks: An observational study in Tampa and Chicago. Leisure Sci.2008;30:360–375.
45.
Bedimo-RungALMowenAJCohenDA. The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. Am J Prev Med.2005;28:159–168.
46.
US Department of Health and Human Services, Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health.2nd ed.Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000.
47.
McNeillLHKreuterMWSubramanianSV. Social environment and physical activity: A review of concepts and evidence. Soc Sci Med.2006;63:1011–1022.
48.
CerinELeslieE. How socio-economic status contributes to participation in leisure-time physical activity. Soc Sci Med.2008;66:2596–2609.
