Reliability and Validity of the Youth Asset Survey: An Update

Abstract

Purpose.

Improve and expand an existing youth asset scale.

Design.

Consisted of seven steps: (1) review of poorer-performing items and constructs, (2) literature review for relevant new asset constructs/items, (3) review of revised instrument by panel of experts, (4) qualitative review through focus group research, (5) pilot-test of instrument, (6) evaluation of the performance of the instrument in a longitudinal study, and (7) conduct of test-retest analysis.

Subjects/Setting.

Youth (N = 1111) recruited through canvassing of randomly selected census tracts and blocks.

Measures.

Youth Asset Survey (YAS).

Analysis.

Factor analysis was conducted on 50% of the baseline data and repeated on the second half of the baseline data. Correlations were computed for the test-retest analysis.

Results.

Following modifications to the YAS based upon qualitative research, the survey was administered to youth (mean age, 14.3years; 53% female; 39% white, 28% Hispanic, 23% African-American, 9% other). Cronbach α = .55–.92. A majority (27 of 34) of α ≥ .65. All items loaded on one construct at α ≥ .40. The final results yielded 17 constructs assessed via 61 items. Spearman correlations and intraclass correlations ranged from .60 to .82 and .58 to .87, respectively.

Conclusion.

The results generally suggest that the expanded YAS is a reliable and valid measure of assets.

Keywords

Youth Asset Survey Youth Development Youth Assets Adolescent Risk Behaviors Prevention Research Manuscript format: research Research purpose: instrument development Study design: nonexperimental Outcome measure: behavioral Setting: local community Health focus: social health Strategy: skill building/behavior change Target population age: youth Target population circumstances: education/income level,race/ethnicity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pittman

Irby

Tolman

. Preventing Problems, Promoting Development, Encouraging Engagement: Competing Priorities or Inseparable Goals? Washington, DC: The Forum for Youth Investment: Impact Strategies, Inc; 2003.

Aspy

Vesely

Tolma

. Youth assets and delayed coitarche across developmental age groups [published online ahead of print March 30, 2009]. J Early Adolesc. Available at: http://jea.sagepub.com. Accessed September 1, 2009.

McKnight

. A 21st century map for healthy communities and families. Fam Soc. 1997;78:117–127.

Atkins

Oman

Vesely

. Adolescent tobacco use: the protective effects of developmental assets. Am J Health Promot. 2002;16:198–205.

Oman

Vesely

Aspy

. The potential protective effect of youth assets on adolescent alcohol and drug use. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1425–1430.

Ostaszewski

Zimmerman

. The effects of cumulative risks and promotive factors on urban adolescent alcohol and other drug use: a longitudinal study of resiliency. Am J Community Psychol. 2006;38:237–249.

Botvin

Griffin

Diaz-Nichols

. Preventing youth violence and delinquency through a universal school-based prevention approach. Prev Sci. 2006;7:406–408.

Botvin

Baker

Dusenbury

. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. JAMA. 1995;273:1106–1112.

Tierney

Grossman

Resch

. Making a Difference: An Impact Study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia, Pa: Public/Private Ventures; 1995.

10.

Price

Dake

Kuchareuski

. Assessing assets in racially diverse, inner-city youths: psychometric properties of the SEARCH Institute asset questionnaire. Fam Community Health. 2002;25:1–9.

11.

Price

Dake

. Asset building: rhetoric versus reality—a cautionary note. J Sch Health. 1999;69:215–216.

12.

Klein

Sabaratnam

Auerbach

. Development and factor structure of a brief instrument to assess the impact of community programs on positive youth development: the Rochester Evaluation of Asset Development for Youth (READY) tool. J Adolesc Health. 2005;39:252–260.

13.

Resnick

Bearman

Blum

. Protecting adolescents from harm: findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA. 1997;278:823–832.

14.

Oman

Vesely

McLeroy

. Reliability and validity of the Youth Asset Survey (YAS). J Adolesc Health. 2002;31:247–255.

15.

Catalano

Berglund

Ryan

. Positive youth development in the United States: research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Prev Treat. 2002;5:15.

16.

Rostosky

Regenerus

Wright

. Coital debut: the role of religiosity and sex attitudes in the Add Health Survey. J Sex Res. 2003;40:358–367.

17.

Kegler

Wyatt

. A multiple case study of neighborhood partnerships for positive youth development. J Health Educ. 2003;27:156–169.

18.

Kegler

Rodine

McLeroy

. Combining quantitative and qualitative techniques in planning and evaluating a community-wide project to prevent adolescent pregnancy. Int Electron Health Educ. 1998;1:39–48.

19.

SPSS for Windows, version 12.0, Chicago, Ill: SPSS Inc; 2003.

20.

Hatcher

. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1994.

21.

Cronbach

. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.

22.

Hulin

Cudeck

Netemeyer

. Measurement. J Consum Psychol. 2001;10:55–69.

23.

Hair

Anderson

Tatham

. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1998.

24.

Landis

Koch

. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.

25.

McLeroy

Bibeau

Steckler

. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15:351–377.