The Stratification of Foods on the Basis of Overall Nutritional Quality: The Overall Nutritional Quality Index

Abstract

Purpose.

Consumer understanding of nutrition information is key to making dietary choices consistent with guidelines. The development of an objective, science-based, and universally applicable system of nutrition guidance would be of considerable potential value to the public health.

Design.

A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop the Overall Nutritional Quality Index (ONQI). Dietary guidelines, existing nutritional scoring systems, and other pertinent scientific literature were reviewed. An algorithm based on the overall nutritional quality of food was developed and subjected to consumer research and validation testing.

Results.

The ONQI algorithm incorporates over 30 entries representing both micronutrient and macronutrient properties of foods, as well as weighting coefficients representing epidemiologic associations between nutrients and health outcomes. The basic entry in the algorithm is a weighted trajectory score, which compares nutrient concentration in a food to the recommended concentration of a given nutrient in a healthful diet. In content validity testing, ONQI rankings and expert panel rankings correlated highly (R = .92; p < .001). In regression analysis, aggregated ONQI scores for total diet corresponded well with the Healthy Eating Index (p < .001) in the National Health and Nutrient Examination Survey 2003–2006 cohort (n = 15,900). Consumer research indicated strong appeal to consumers of the ONQI system in general, and the scores on a 1 to 100 scale specifically. A system for acquiring nutrient data, meeting U.S. Food and Drug Administration and U.S. Department of Agriculture standards, has been established so that virtually any food, beverage, meal, or recipe can be scored.

Conclusions.

The ONQI is a sophisticated nutrition guidance system developed by a multidisciplinary group independently of all food industry interests with excellent initial performance in both consumer research and validation testing. Combined with a consumer education program, the ONQI has considerable potential to improve dietary patterns, and consequently the public health. Prospective study of effects on dietary patterns and health outcomes is warranted.

Keywords

Public Health Nutrient Profiling Consumer Food Quality and Index Prevention Research Manuscript format: research Research purpose: modeling/relationship testing Study design: nonexperimental Outcome measure: overall nutritional quality of foods Setting: state/national Health focus: nutrition Strategy: education Target population: youths adults,seniors Target population circumstances: all

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

US Dept of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Information Center. Food and Nutrition Information Center. Available at: http://fnic.nal.usda.gov/nal_display/index.php?infb_center=4&tax_level=1. Accessed April 21, 2008.

US Food and Drug Administration. Milestones in US food and drug law history. Updated August 2005. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/opacom/backgrounders/miles.html. Accessed April 21, 2008.

Kraft Foods. The Sensible Solution Program. Available at: http://kraftfoods.com/kf/HealthyLiving/SensibleSolution/SensibleSolutionProgram.htm. Accessed April 21, 2008.

Pepsico, Inc. The Smart Spot. Available at: http://www.smartspot.com/about. Accessed April 21, 2008.

Unilever. The Choices Programme. Available at: http://www.unilever.com/outvalues/nutritionhygienepersonalcare/nutrition/choices/default.asp. Accessed April 21, 2008.

American Heart Association. Food Certification Program. Available at: http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=2115. Accessed April 21, 2008.

Appel

Moore

Obarzanek

. A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. DASH Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1117–1124.

Fogli-Cawley

Dwyer

Saltzman

. The 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans and risk of the metabolic syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86:1193–1201.

Fung

Willett

Stampfer

. Dietary patterns and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1857–1862.

10.

Krebs-Smith

Kris-Etherton

. How does MyPyramid compare to other population-based recommendations for controlling chronic disease? J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:830–837.

11.

US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Science and Applied Nutrition. Calories count: report of the Working Group on Obesity. Available at: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/owg-toc.html. Accessed April 21, 2008.

12.

Griffin Hospital. Griffin Hospital Web site. Available at: www.griffinhealth.org. Accessed April 21, 2008.

13.

Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes: guiding principles for nutrition labeling and fortification; 2003. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10872. Accessed January 8, 2006.

14.

US Dept of Health and Human Services, USDA. US dietary guidelines for Americans, 2005. Available at: http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2005/document/defaulthtm. Accessed January 8, 2006.

15.

US Government Printing Office via GPO Access. Food labeling, 21 CFR vol. 2, pt. 101 (2001). Available at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_01/21cfr101_01.html. Accessed January 8, 2006.

16.

US Dept of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. USDA national nutrient database for standard reference. Available at: http://www.ars.usda.gov/nutrientdata. Accessed January 8, 2006.

17.

Preparation and Use of Food-Based Dietary Guidelines. Report of a joint FAO/WHO consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1998. WHO technical report series, No. 880.

18.

Institute of Medicine, Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005.

19.

Institute of Medicine, Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004.

20.

University of Minnesota. Nutrition Coordinating Center Web site. Available at: http://www.ncc.umn.edu/. Accessed January 8, 2006.

21.

Gladson Interactive, Inc. Web site. Available at: http://www.gladson.com. Accessed January 8, 2006.

22.

US Food and Drug Administration, Dept of Health and Human Services. 21 CFR, vol.2 (2007). Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=101. Accessed April 30, 2007.

23.

US Food and Drug Administration, Dept of Health and Human Services. Public hearing on use of symbols to communicate nutrition information, consideration of consumer studies and nutritional criteria; September 10–11, 2007; Adelphi, MD. Available at: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~comm/registe6.html. Accessed October 15, 2007.

24.

General Mills, Inc. Nutrition Highlights panel. Available at: http://www.generalmills.com/corporate/health_wellness/nutrition_highlights.aspx. Accessed June 13, 2008.

25.

Kellogg NA Co. Nutrition at a Glance tool. Available at: http://www.kelloggs.com/nutrition/learn-about-labels/nutrition-at-a-glance.html. Accessed June 13, 2008.

26.

Your Guide to Lowering Your Blood Pressure with DASH: DASH Eating Plan. Bethesda, Md: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 2006. NIH publication 06–4082.

27.

The Keystone Center. Healthy policy. Available at: http://www.keystone.org/spp/health-practice.html. Accessed June 13, 2008.

28.

Hannaford Brothers Co. Guiding Stars program: customer applause. Available at: http://www.hannaford.com/Contents/Healthy_Living/Guiding_Stars/customer_applause.shtml. Accessed June 13, 2008.

29.

Drewnowski

Fulgoni

3rd . Nutrient profiling of foods: creating a nutrient-rich food index. Nutr Rev. 2008;66:23–39.

30.

Garsetti

de Vries

Smith

. Nutrient profiling schemes: overview and comparative analysis. Eur J Nutr. 2007;46(suppl 2):15–28.

31.

Labouze

Goffi

Moulay

Azaïs-Braesco

. A multipurpose tool to evaluate the nutritional quality of individual foods: Nutrimap. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10:690–700.

32.

Willett

Sampson

Stampfer

. Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122:51–65.

33.

Feskanich

Rimm

Giovannucci

. Reproducibility and validity of food intake measurements from a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. J Am Diet Assoc. 1993;93:790–796.

34.

Rimm

Giovannucci

Stampfer

. Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among male health professionals. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135:1127–1136; discussion 27–36.

35.

McCullough

Willett

. Evaluating adherence to recommended diets in adults: the Alternate Healthy Eating Index. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9:152–157.

36.

Symposium: Where Is the Science: Do Current Nutrition Profiling/Food Scoring Systems Promote Consumer Intake of Nutrient Dense Foods? Experimental Biology 2009 Annual Conference; April 18–21, 2009; New Orleans, La.

37.

Casagrande

Wang

Anderson

Gary

. Have Americans increased their fruit and vegetable intake? The trends between 1988 and 2002. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:257–263.

38.

Kant

Graubard

. Secular trends in patterns of self-reported food consumption of adult Americans: NHANES 1971–1975 to NHANES 1999–2002. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:1215–1223.

39.

Willett

. Trans fatty acids and cardiovascular disease-epidemiological data. Atheroscler Suppl. 2006;7:5–8.

40.

Ascherio

Hennekens

Buring

. Trans-fatty acids intake and risk of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1994;89:94–101.

41.

Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Nutrition labeling of food. 21 CFR §101.9. Updated April 1, 2008. Available at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/index.html. Accessed June 13, 2008.

42.

Kumpulainen

. Chromium content of foods and diets. Biol Trace Elan Res. 1992;32:9–18.

43.

Institute of Medicine, Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

44.

Institute of Medicine, Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Selenium, and Carotenoids. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

45.

Institute of Medicine, Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998.

46.

Williams

Burdge

. Long-chain n-3 PUFA: plant v. marine sources. Proc Nutr Soc. 2006;65:42–50.

47.

Azais-Bresco

Cioffi

LaBouze

. Nutrient profiling: comparisons and critical analysis of existing systems. Pub Health Nutr. 2006;9:613–622.