Satisfaction with a Weight Loss Program: What Matters?

Abstract

Purpose.

Satisfaction is understudied in weight loss programs. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between participant/program experiences and satisfaction with a weight loss intervention.

Design.

A prospective cohort design was utilized.

Setting.

The study was conducted in the Minneapolis metro area.

Sample.

Participants were obese employees of a managed care organization. One hundred were enrolled, and 78 had complete data available.

Intervention.

Treatment included telephone counseling along with a home telemonitoring scale and instructions to self-weigh daily.

Measures.

Outcomes included overall program satisfaction and willingness to refer the program to others. Predictors included demographics, treatment group, participation in other programs, expected weight, general health, body mass index, diet quality, physical activity, body image, mental health, counseling, and self-weighing.

Analysis.

Quantitative predictor-outcome associations were examined using multiple logistic regressions. Qualitative satisfaction responses were analyzed using a general inductive approach.

Results.

Weight loss (odds ratio [OR] = 1.83, p = .008), improved diet (OR = 1.27, p = .092), increased physical activity (OR = 1.05, p = .034), and improved body image (OR = 1.38, p = .051) were independent predictors of overall satisfaction. Treatment group (OR = 14.83, p = .015) and number of counseling calls (OR = 1.49, p = .009) were predictors of willingness to refer the program. Qualitative themes indicated desire to integrate counseling on emotional issues.

Conclusion.

Health progress explained overall satisfaction, whereas treatment characteristics explained willingness to endorse the intervention. Concentrating on these factors may improve retention. Limitations included self-reported measures.

Keywords

Patient Satisfaction Weight Loss Telemonitoring Counseling Manuscript format: quantitative research Research purpose: program evaluation Study design: quasiexperimental Outcome measure: cognitive Setting: workplace Health focus: weight control Strategy: skill-building/behavior change Target population age: adults Target population circumstances: education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Flegal

Carroll

Ogden

Johnson

. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002;288:1723–1727.

National Institutes of Health: National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute, Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: The evidence report. Obes Res. 1998;6(suppl 2):51S–209S.

Andreyeva

Roland

Ringel

. Moderate and severe obesity have large differences in health care costs. Obes Res. 2004;12:1936–1943.

Jeffery

Drewnowski

Epstein

, Long-term maintenance of weight loss: Current status. Health Psychol. 2000;19(suppl 1):5–16.

Jeffery

Kelly

Rothman

Sherwood

Boutelle

. The weight loss experience: A descriptive analysis. Ann Behav Med. 2004;27:100–106.

Tsai

Wadden

. Systematic review: An evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:56–66.

Vavra

. Improving Your Measurement of Customer Satisfaction: A Guide to Creating, Conducting, Analyzing, and Reporting Customer Satisfaction Measurement Programs. Milwaukee, Wis: ASQ Quality Press; 1997.

American Association of Diabetes Educators Research Committee. CQI: A Step-by-Step Guide for Quality Improvement in Diabetes Education. Chicago, Ill: American Association of Diabetes Educators; 2005.

Pratt

. Factors related to the completion of a weight reduction program. J Am Diet Assoc. 1990;90:1268–1270.

10.

Pratt

McLaughlin

Gaylord

A multivariate analysis of weight-loss behavior. Psychol Rep. 1992;71:1075–1084.

11.

Abood

Black

Coster

. Evaluation of a school-based teen obesity prevention minimal intervention. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008;40:168–174.

12.

Ballantyne

. Measuring outcomes following bariatric surgery: Weight loss parameters, improvement in co-morbid conditions, change in quality of life and patient satisfaction. Obes Surg. 2003;13:954–964.

13.

Finch

Linde

Jeffery

, The effects of outcome expectations and satisfaction on weight loss and maintenance: Correlational and experimental analyses—a randomized trial. Health Psychol. 2005;24:608–616.

14.

Jeffery

Linde

Finch

Rothman

King

. A satisfaction enhancement intervention for long-term weight loss. Obesity. 2006;14:863–869.

15.

Shai

Henkin

Weitzman

Levi

Determinants of long-term satisfaction after vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2003;13:269–274.

16.

Haugen

Tran

Wyatt

Barry

Hill

. Using telehealth to increase participation in weight maintenance programs. Obesity. 2007;15:3067–3077.

17.

Jones

Furlanetto

Jackson

Kinn

An investigation of obese adults’ views of the outcomes of dietary treatment. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2007;20:486–494.

18.

Burke

Steenkiste

Music

Styn

. A descriptive study of past experiences with weight-loss treatment. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108:640–647.

19.

VanWormer

Martinez

Benson

, Telephone counseling and home telemonitoring: The Weigh By Day trial. Am J Health Behav. In press.

20.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Methods and measures. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/methods.htm. Accessed January 7, 2008.

21.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire. Atlanta, Ga: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2001.

22.

Kant

Schatzkin

Graubard

Schairer

A prospective study of diet quality and mortality in women. JAMA. 2000;283:2109–2115.

23.

Mai

Kant

Flood

, Diet quality and subsequent cancer incidence and mortality in a prospective cohort of women. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:54–60.

24.

Jeffery

McGuire

Brelje

, Recruitment to mail and telephone interventions for obesity in a managed care environment: The Weigh-To-Be project. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10:378–382.

25.

Cody

Smith

. Applied Statistics and the SAS Programming Language. New York, NY: Prentice Hall; 2005.

26.

Holland

Copenhaver

Improved Bonferroni-type multiple testing procedures. Psychol Bull. 1988;104:145–149.

27.

Thomas

. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27:237–246.

28.

Brink

Ferguson

The decision to lose weight. West J Nurs Res. 1998;20:84–102.

29.

O'Brien

Venn

Perry

, Reasons for wanting to lose weight: Different strokes for different folks. Eat Behav. 2007;8:132–135.

30.

Hankey

Leslie

Lean

. Why lose weight? Reasons for seeking weight loss by overweight but otherwise healthy men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26:880–882.

31.

Teixeira

Going

Houtkooper

, Pretreatment predictors of attrition and successful weight management in women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:1124–1133.

32.

Schoeller

. How accurate is self-reported dietary energy intake? Nutr Rev. 1990;48:373–379.

33.

Lichtman

Pisarska

Berman

, Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1893–1898.

34.

Nygren

Askmark

Self-reported quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Palliat Med. 2006;9:304–308.

35.

McCormick

Yahalom

Cox

Shank

Massie

. The patient's perception of her breast following radiation and limited surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;17:1299–1302.

36.

O'Dea

Abraham

Onset of disordered eating attitudes and behaviors in early adolescence: Interplay of pubertal status, gender, weight, and age. Adolescence. 1999;34:671–679.