The hypothesis that overweight workers are more likely to participate in health promotion activities during times of organizational contraction than during other times was tested in a sample of 408 overweight employees selected from the total employee population at the headquarters facility of Control Data Corporation (CDC) in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Organizational contraction was defined as the average percentage loss of workers in the firm for the three months prior to a program offering. Organizational contraction levels were then compared with participation in weight control programs. The results of the logistic regression analysis support the hypothesis that participation in health promotion activities would be greater during periods of high levels of organizational contraction than during lower levels (1,34, p < .01).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National survey of worksite health promotion activities: A summary. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Washington, D.C., 1987.
2.
FieldingJ.BreslowL.Health promotion programs sponsored by California employers. American Journal of Public Health, 1983; 3:538–543.
3.
KizerW.The Health Workplace: A Blueprint for Corporate Action. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987.
4.
LevitK.FreelandM.WaldoD.Health spending and ability to pay: Business, individuals and government. Health Care Financing Review, 1989; 10:1–11.
5.
ParkinsonR.Associates. Managing Health Promotion in the Worksite: Guidelines for Implementation and Evaluation. Mayfield Publishing Co., Palo Alto, California; 1982.
6.
O'DonnellM.AinsworthT.Health Promotion in the Workplace. Wiley & Sons, New York; 1984.
7.
WarnerK.WickizerT.WolfeR.SchildrothJ.SamuelsonM.Economic implications of workplace health promotion programs: Review of the literature. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 1988; 30:106–112.
8.
BowneD.RussellM.MorganJ.OptenbergS.ClarkeA.Reduced disability and health care costs in an industrial fitness program. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 1984; 26:809–816.
9.
GibbsJ.MulvaneyD.HenesC.ReedR.Work-site health promotion: Five-year trend in employee health care costs. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 1985; 27:826–830.
10.
AndersonD.JoseW.Employee lifestyle and the bottom line: Results for the StayWell evaluation. Fitness in Business, December 1987; 86–91.
11.
SpilmanM.GoetzA.SchulzJ.BellinghamR.JohnsonD.Effects of a corporate health program. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 1986; 28:285–289.
12.
VickeryD.GolaszewskiT.WrightE.McPheeL.Life-style and organizational health insurance costs. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 1986; 28:1165–1168.
13.
BaunW.BernackiE.TsaiS.A preliminary investigation: Effect of a corporate fitness program on absenteeism and health care cost. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 1986; 28:18–22.
14.
FieldingJ.Health promotion and disease prevention at the worksite. Annual Review of Public Health;1984; 5:237–265.
15.
BlyJ.JonesR.RichardsonJ.Impact of worksite health promotion on health care costs and utilization: Evaluation of Johnson & Johnson's Live for Life program. Journal of American Medical Association;1986; 256:3235–3240.
16.
ConradP.Who comes to work-site wellness programs? A preliminary review. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 1987; 29:317–320.
17.
ShefflerR.The Economic Evidence on Prevention. Healthy people: The Surgeon General's Report on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: Background Papers. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1979. Pp. 441–455.
18.
FieldingJ.The proof of the health promotion pudding is …. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 1988; 30:113–115.
19.
SloanR.GrumanJ.Participation in workplace health promotion programs: The contribution of health and organizational factors. Health Education Quarterly, 1988; 15:269–288.
20.
SloanR.Workplace health promotion: A commentary on the evolution of a paradigm. Health Education Quarterly, 1987; 14:181–194.
21.
WearR.Existing health promotion programs in industry. Presented at the conference, Health Education and Promotion: Agenda for the Eighties. The Health Insurance Association of America and the American Council of Life Insurance, Atlanta, March 1980.
22.
AldermanM.GreenL.FlynnB.Hypertension control programs in occupational settings. Managing Health Promotion in the Workplace: Guidelines for Implementation and Evaluation. R.S. Parkinson and Associates, Palo Alto, California, 1982.
23.
SchoenbergerJ.Heart disease in industry: The Chicago Heart Association Project. Presented at the Conference on High Blood Pressure Control in the Work Setting, Washington, D.C., October; 1976.
24.
WanzelR.Factors related to withdrawal from an employee fitness program. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, Seattle; 1977.
25.
HaskellW.BlairS.The physical activity of health promotion in occupational settings. Managing Health Promotion in the Workplace: Guidelines for Implementation and Evaluation. R.S. Parkinson and Associates, Palo Alto, California, 1982.
26.
FeldmanR.The assessment and enhancement of health compliance in the workplace. Occupational Health Promotion: Health Behavior in the Workplace. EverlyG.Jr.FeldmanR. (Eds.). Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985.
27.
GlasgowR.KlesgesR.KlesgesL.SomesG.Variables associated with participation and outcome in a worksite smoking control program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1988; 56:617–620.
28.
National Center for Health Statistics: Health, United States, DHHS. Pub No (PHS) 86-1232. Public Health Service, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1985.
29.
CockerhamW.Medical Sociology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1982.
30.
BeckerM.The health belief model and personal behavior. Health Education Monograph, 1974; 2 (whole No. 4).
31.
FishbeinM.AzjenI.Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1975.
32.
DavisK.JacksonK.KronenfeldJ.Intent to participate in worksite health promotion activities: A model of risk factors and psychosocial variables. Health Education Quarterly, 1987; 14:195–205.
33.
ZavelaK.DavisL.CottrellR.Do only the healthy intend to participate in worksite health promotion?Health Education Quarterly, 1988; 15:259–267.
34.
BarkerR.ShoggenP.Qualities of Community Life. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1973.
35.
WickerA.An Introduction to Ecological Psychology. Wadsworth, Belmont, California, 1979.
36.
WickizerT.SamuelsonM.Using claims data to set health promotion goals. Business and Health, October 1987; 28–30.
37.
CatalanoR.DooleyD.RookK.Labor markets and help-seeking: A test of the employment security hypothesis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1986; 27:277–287.
38.
RicklefsR.BennetA.Market's crash continues to take psychological toll. Wall Street Journal, March 31, 1988; 1.
39.
GlasgowR.TerborgJ.Occupational health promotion programs to reduce cardiovascular risk. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1988; 56, 365–373.
40.
TerborgJ.Health promotion at the worksite: A research challenge for personnel and human resources management. Personnel and Human Resources Management, 1986; 4:225–267.
41.
BrownellK.CohenR.StunkardA.Weight loss competitions at the work site: Impact on weight, morale, and cost-effectiveness. American Journal of Public Health, 1984; 74:1283–1285.
42.
SeidmanL.SeveliusG.EwaldP.A cost-effective weight loss program at the worksite. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 1984; 26:725–730.
43.
NaditchM.StayWell: Evolution of a behavioral medicine program in industry. Health and Industry: A Behavioral Medicine Perspective. CataldoM.CoatesT. (Eds.). Wiley & Sons, New York, 1986. Pp. 323–337.
44.
DooleyD.CatalanoR.Why the economy predicts help-seeking: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1984a; 25:160–176.
45.
DooleyD.CatalanoR.The epidemiology of economic stress. American Journal of Community Psychology, 1984b; 12:387–409.
46.
SerxnerS.Organizational environment and employee participation in worksite health promotion programs. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Irvine, California, 1988.
47.
SmithK.McKinlayS.ThoringtonB.The validity of health risk appraisal instruments for assessing coronary heart disease risk. American Institutes for Research, Cambridge Research Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts, March 1986.
48.
ClearyP.AngelR.The analysis of relationships involving dichotomous dependent variables. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1984; 25:324–338.
49.
KnokeD.BurkeP.Log-Linear Models Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California, 1980.
