Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Purpose.

To test the effectiveness of a video to teach patients about prostate cancer screening and treatment in a clinic setting.

Methods.

A staged, two-group, pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design was used. Questionnaires were completed before and after a routine doctor's appointment in a Veteran's Administration clinic. The experimental group (n = 52) viewed the video, and the control group (n = 52) received usual care only. The two groups were similar in age, education, race, and quality of life.

Results.

Knowledge increased significantly from pretest to posttest for the experimental group, but not for the control group (p < .001). More patients in the experimental group changed their preference for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening (31% experimental vs. 2% control, p = .002), indicating the patients were impacted by the information presented. Viewing the video did not stimulate increased discussion with the physician or lengthen appointment time.

Conclusion.

The video was effective in improving knowledge about a complex topic and changing some patients' preference for PSA testing without frightening or confusing patients.

Keywords

Informed Decision Making Prostate Cancer Screening Patient Education Prevention Research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Degner

Sloan

. Decision making during serious illness: what roles do patients really want? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:941–950.

Hagopian

. The effects of informational audiotapes on knowledge and self-care behaviors of patients undergoing radiation therapy. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23:697–700.

Reynolds

Sanson-Fisher

Poole

. Cancer and communication: information giving in an oncology clinic. Br Med J. 1981;282:1449–1451.

Wolf

Nasser

Wolf

Schorling

. The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate specific antigen screening. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1333–1336.

Garden

Merry

Holland

Petries

. Anaesthesia information: what patients want to know. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1996;24:594–596.

US Preventive Services Task Force. Recommendations and rationale: screening for prostate cancer. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/prostatescr/prostaterr.htm. Accessed January 14, 2003.

Ferrans

Powers

. Quality of life index development and psychometric properties. Adv Nurs Sci. 1985;8:15–24.

Degner

Russell

. Preferences for treatment control among adults with cancer. Res Nurs Health. 1988;11:367–374.

Ferrans

Powers

Kasch

. Satisfaction with health care of hemodialysis patients. Res Nurs Health. 1987;15:29–38.

10.

The PSA Decision: What You Need to Know [videotape]. Hanover, New Hampshire: Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making; 1995.

11.

Flood

Wennberg

Nease

. The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:342–349.

12.

Smith

Cokkinides

von Eschenbach

. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clinician. 2002;52(101):8–22.

13.

The jury is still out with regard to screening for the prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen. Eur J Cancer Care. 2002;11(2):78.

Efficacy of a Video for Teaching Patients about Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment