MonahanT. Fitness and exercise in advertising: Mining a national mania. Physician Sports Med.1987;15(5):160–165, 168.
2.
CardinalBJSachsML. An analysis of the readability of exercise promoting literature with implications and suggestions for practice. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992;63:186–190.
3.
US Department of Health and Human ServicesPhysical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Ga: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996.
4.
FieldingJPiserchiaP. Frequency of worksite health promotion activities. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:16–20.
5.
RoszakT. The Making of a Counter Culture: Reflections on the Technocratic Society and Its Youthful Opposition. 2nd ed.Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 1995.
6.
RuddJButtolphVL. Consumer curricular materials: The first content analysis. J Consumer Affairs. 1987;21:108–121.
7.
NandyBRSarvelaPD. Content analysis reexamined: A relevant research method for health education. Am J Health Behav.1997;21:222–234.
8.
FleissJL.Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
9.
StryerDBeroLA. Characteristics of materials distributed by drug companies. An evaluation of appropriateness. J Gen Intern Med.1996;11:575–583.
10.
GlanzKRuddJ. Readability and content analysis of print cholesterol education materials. Patient Educ Council. 1990;16:109–118.
