Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1999-7
A Review and Analysis of the Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Comprehensive Health Promotion and Disease Management Programs at the Worksite: 1995–1998 Update (IV)
Hewitt Associates. Work and Family Benefits Provided by Major US Employers in 1996: Based on Practices of 1,050 Employers. Lincolnshire: Hewitt Associates, 1997.
2.
US Public Health Service. 1992 national survey of worksite health promotion activities: Summary. Am J Health Promot1993;7:452–64.
3.
PelletierK.A review and analysis of the health and cost-effective outcomes studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease prevention programs. Am J Health Promot1991;5:311–5.
4.
PelletierK.A review and analysis of the health and cost-effective outcome studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease prevention programs at the worksite: 1991–1993 update. Am J Health Promot1993;8:43–9.
5.
PelletierK.A review and analysis of the health and cost-effective outcome studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease prevention programs at the worksite: 1993–1995 update. Am J Health Promot1996;10:380–8.
6.
StokolsDPelletierKFieldingsJ. Integration of medical care and worksite health promotion. JAMA1995;273:1136–42.
7.
ChapmanL. Proof Positive: An Analysis of the Cost Effectiveness of Wellness. 2nd ed.Seattle: Corporate Health Designs, 1995.
8.
HeaneyCAGoetzelRZ. A review of health-related outcomes of multi-component worksite health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot1997;11:290–307.
9.
O'DonnellM. Health impact of workplace health promotion programs and methodological quality of the research literature. Art Health Promot1997;1:1–7.
10.
AldanaS. Financial impact of worksite health promotion and methodological quality of the evidence. Art Health Promot1998;2:1–4.
11.
BowneDWRussellMLMorganJL. Reduced disability and health care costs in an industrial fitness program. J Occup Med1984;26:809–16.
12.
BauerRLHellerRFChallahS. United Kingdom Heart Disease Prevention Project: 12 year follow-up of risk factors. Am J Health Promot1985;121:563–9.
13.
JacobsDJefferyRForsterJ. Methodological issues in worksite health intervention research: In: A Framework for Generalizability and Process and Outcome Evaluation. 1988 Methodological Issues in Worksite Research Proceedings, Washington, DC, US Dept Health and Human Services, 1988:65–76.
14.
JacobsDHannanPJefferyR. Methodological issues in worksite health intervention research: II. Computation of variance in worksite data: Units of analysis. 1988 Methodological Issues in Worksite Research Proceedings, Washington, DC, US Dept Health and Human Services, 1988:77–88.
15.
WilsonMHolmanPBHammockA. A comprehensive review of the effects of worksite health promotion on health-related outcomes. Am J Health Promot1996;10:429–35.
16.
GlanzKSorensenGFarmerA. The health impact of worksite nutrition and cholesterol intervention programs. Am J Health Promot1996; 10:453–70.
17.
AndersonDStaufackerM. The impact of worksite-based health risk appraisal on health related outcomes: A review of the literature. Am J Health Promot1996;10:499–508.
18.
HennrikusDJJefferyRW. Worksite intervention for weight control: A review of the literature. Am J Health Promot1996;10:471–98.
19.
ShephardRJ. Worksite fitness and exercise programs: A review of methodology and health impact. Am J Health Promot1996;10:436–52.
20.
BreslowLFieldingJHerrmanAA. Worksite health promotion: Its evolution and the Johnson & Johnson experience. Prev Med1990;19:13–21.
21.
DaltonBAHarrisJS. A comprehensive approach to corporate health management. J Occup Med1991;33:338–47.
22.
GarofaloK. Worksite wellness—rewarding health behavior: Successful professionals. AAOHN J1994;42:236–40.
23.
DeJoyDM. An integrative perspective on worksite health promotion. J Occup Med1993;35:1221–30.
24.
HeaneyCAGoldenharLM. Worksite health programs: Working together to advance employee health. Health Educ Q1996;23:133–6.
25.
MurrayDM. Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
26.
GlasgowREMcCaulKDFisherKJ. Participation in worksite health promotion: A critique of the literature and recommendations for future practice. Health Educ Q1993;20:391–408.
27.
FisherKJGlasgowRETerborgJR. Worksite smoking cessation: A meta-analysis of long-term quit rates from controlled studies. J Occup Med1990;32:429–39.
28.
GlasgowRETerborgJR. Occupational health promotion programs to reduce cardiovascular risk. J Cons Clin Psychol1988;56:365–73.
29.
GolaszewskiT. A benefit-to-cost analysis of a work-site health promotion program. J Occup Med1992;34:1163–72.
30.
ShiL. Worksite health promotion and changes in medical care use and sick days. Health Values1993;17(5):9–17.
31.
ShiL. A cost-benefit analysis of a California county's back injury prevention program. Public Health Rep1993;108:204–11.
32.
FriesJFBlochDAHarringtonH. Two-year results of a randomized controlled trial of a health promotion program in a retiree population: The Bank of America study. Am J Med1993;94;455–62.
33.
HarveyMWhitmerRHelyerJ. The impact of a comprehensive medical benefit cost management program for the city of Birmingham: Results at five years. Am J Health Promot1993;7:296–303.
34.
ProchaskaJODiClementeCCVelicerWF. Standardized, individualized, interactive, and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation. Health Psychol1993;12:399–405.
35.
HolzbachRLPiserchiaPVMcFaddenDW. Effect of a comprehensive health promotion program on employee attitudes. J Occup Med1990;32:973–78.
36.
JonesRBlyJRichardsonJ. A study of a worksite health promotion program and absenteeism. J Occup Med1990;32:95–9.
37.
BalerCGrodzinCPortJ. Coronary risk factor behavior change in hospital personnel following a screening program. Am J Prev Med1992;8:115–22.
38.
LarsenPSimonsN. Evaluating a federal health and fitness program: Indicators of improving health. AAOHN J1993;41:143–8.
39.
FriesJFKoopCEBeadleCE. Reducing health care costs by reducing the need and demand for medical services: The health project consortium. N Engl J Med1993;329:321–5.
40.
JefferyRWForsterJLDunnBV. Effects of worksite health promotion on illness related absenteeism. J Occup Med1993;35:1142–6.
41.
MurrayDMHannanPJ. Planning for the appropriate analysis in school-based drug-use prevention studies. J Consult Clin Psychol1990;58:458–68.
42.
HedekerDMcMahonSDJasonLASalinaD. Analysis of clustered data in community psychology: With an example from a worksite smoking cessation project. Am J Community Psychol1994;22:595–615.
43.
KelderSHJacobsDRJrJefferyRW. The worksite component of variance: Design effects and the healthy worker projectHealth Educ Res1993;8:555–66.
44.
GomelMOldenburgBSimpsonJM. Work-site cardiovascular risk reduction: A randomized trial of health risk assessment, education, counseling, and incentives. Am J Health Promot1993;83:1231–8.
45.
WorickAPetersonsM. Weight loss contests at the worksite: Results of repeat participation. J Am Diet Assoc1993;93:680–1.
46.
SangorMRBichanichP. Weight-reducing program for hospital employees. J Am Diet Assoc1977;71:535–6.
47.
BloomHS. Accounting for no-shows in experimental evaluation designs. Eval Rev1984;8:225–46.
48.
RibislKMReischlTM. Measuring the climate for health at organizations. J Occup Med1993;35:812–24.
49.
FriesJFHarringtonHEdwardsR. Randomized controlled trial of cost reductions form a health education program: The California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) Study. Am J Health Promot1994;8:217–23.
50.
GoetzelRSepulvedaMKnightK. Association of IBM's “A Plan for Life” health promotion program with changes in employees health risk status. J Occup Med1994;36:1005–9.
51.
KnightKKGoetzelRZFieldingJE. An evaluation of Duke University's Live For Life health promotion program on changes in worker absenteeism. J Occup Med1994:36:553–6.
52.
GoetzelRDanaSKennyG. An evaluation of Duke University's Live For Life health promotion program and its impact on employee health. Am J Health Promot1996;10:340–2.
53.
GoetzelRThorpeKFieldingJ. Behind the scenes of a POS program. J Health Care Benefits1992:33–7.
54.
SorensenGGlasgowRECorbettK. Compliance with worksite nonsmoking policies: Baseline results from the COMMIT study of worksites. Am J Health Promot1992;7:103–9.
55.
RibislKMWaltonMAMowbrayCT. Minimizing participant attrition in panel studies through the use of effective retention and tracking strategies: Review and recommendations. Eval Program Plann1996;19:1–25.
56.
FieldingJMasonTKnightK. A randomized trial of the IMPACT worksite cholesterol reduction program. Am J Prev Med1995;11:120–3.
57.
EllisEKoblinWIrvineJM. Small, blue collar work-site hypertension screening: A cost-effectiveness study. J Occup Med1994;36:346–55.
58.
HaskellWLAldermanELFairJM. Effects of intensive multiple risk factor reduction or coronary atherosclerosis and clinical cardiac events in men and women with coronary artery disease: The Stanford Coronary Risk Intervention Project (SCRIP). Circulation1994;89:975–90.
59.
WhitmerRW. The City of Birmingham's wellness partnership contains medical costs. Business Health1992;10(4):60–6.
60.
HarveyMRWhitmerRWHilyerJC. The impact of a comprehensive medical benefit cost management program for the city of Birmingham: Results at five years. Am J Health Promot1993;7:296–303.
61.
JefferyRWForsterJLFrenchSA. The Healthy Worker Project: A worksite intervention for weight control and smoking cessation. Am J Public Health1993;6283:395–401.
62.
JefferyRForserJSchmidT. Worksite health promotion: Feasibility testing of repeated weight control and smoking cessation classes. Am J Health Promot1989;311–16.
63.
ErfurtJCFooteAHeirichMA. Worksite wellness programs; incremental comparisons of screening and referral alone, health education, follow-up counseling, and plant organization. Am J Health Promot1991;5:438–48.
64.
ErfurtJCHoltynK. Health promotion in small business: What works and what doesn't work. J Occup Med1991;33:66–73.
65.
GreggWFooteAErfurtJC. Worksite follow-up and engagements strategies for initiating health risk behavior changes. Health Educ Q1990;17:455–78.
66.
FioreMCNovotnyTEPierceJP. Methods used to quit smoking in the United States: Do cessation programs help?JAMA1990;263:2760–5.
67.
SchmidTLJefferyRWHellerstadtW. Direct mail recruitment to home-based smoking and weight control programs: A comparison of strategies. Prev Med1989;18:503–17.
68.
HerzlingerRESchwartzJ. How companies tackle health care costs: Part I. Harvard Business Rev1985;63(4):69–81.
69.
LovatoCYGreenLWStainbrookGL. Benefits anticipated by industry in supporting health promotion programs in the worksite. In: OpatzJP, editor. Economic Impact of Worksite Health Promotion. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1994:3–31.
70.
WheatJR. Does workplace health promotion decrease medical claims?Am J Prev Med1992;8:110–4.
71.
ShiL. Health promotion, medical care use, and costs in a sample of worksite employees. Eval Rev1993;17:475–87.
72.
SciaccaJSeehaferRReedR. The impact of participation in health promotion on medical costs: A reconsideration of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Indiana study. Am J Health Promot1993;7:374–83.
73.
AldanaSGJacobsonBHKelleyPL. The effectiveness of a mobile worksite health promotion program in lowering employee health risk. Am J Health Promot1994;8:254–6.
74.
ShephardR. Exercise and reduced health-care costs: A substantial dividend of primary preventive programs. J Cardiopulmonary Rehabil1994;14:161–5.
75.
BlairSNSmithMCollingwoodTR. Health promotion for educators: Impact on absenteeism. Prev Med1986;15:166–75.
76.
KingeryPMEllsworthCGCorbettBS. High cost analysis: A closer look at the case for work-site health prevention. J Occup Med1994;36:1341–7.
77.
WarnerKE. Wellness at the worksite. Health Affairs1990;9:63–79.
78.
FieldingJECumberlandWGPettittL. Immunization status of children of employees in a large corporation. JAMA1994;271:525–30.
79.
FieldingJEKnightKMasonT. Evaluation of the IMPACT blood pressure program. J Occup Med1994;36:743–46.
80.
LorigKKrainesRGBrownBWJr. A workplace health education program that reduces outpatient visits. Med Care1985;23:1044–54.
81.
GolaszewskiTSnowDLynchW. A benefit-to-cost analysis of a worksite health promotion program. J Occup Med1992;34:1164–72.
82.
BerteraRL. Planning and implementing health promotion in the workplace: A case study of the Du Pont Company experience. Health Educ Q1990;17:307–27.
83.
HoltMCMcCauleyMPaulD. Health impacts of AT&T's Total Life Concept (TLC) program after five years. Am J Health Promot1995;9:421–5.
84.
EveryDK. Exploring EAP cost-effectiveness: Profile of a nuclear power plant internal EAP. Employee Assistance Q1994;10:1–12.
85.
OlsonSJ. Worksite health promotion: An investment beyond health care cost containment. Manag Employee Health Benefits1995; Fall:11–8.
86.
LeutzingerJHawesCHunnicutD. Predicting the ratio of benefit to cost in a cardiovascular disease-prevention program. Manag Employee Health Benefits1995; Fall:1–10.
87.
ByersTMullisRAndersonJ. The costs and effects of a nutritional education program following work-site cholesterol screening. Am J Public Health1995;85:650–5.
88.
BurtonWHoyD. The economic benefit of a corporate-sponsored mammography program. AWHF Worksite Health1996; Summer:1–6.
89.
GreenwoodMHenritzeJ. Coorscreen: A low cost, on-site mammography screening program. Am J Health Promot1996;10:364–70.
90.
EdingtonDWYenLTWittingP. The financial impact of changes in personal health practices. J Occup Environ Med1997;39:1037–46.
91.
MurnaneJOzminkowskiRGoetzelR. A cost-benefit analysis of the Citibank, N.A. health management program. J Occup Environ Med1998. In press.
92.
GoetzelRZJacobsonBHAldanaSG. Health care costs of worksite health promotion participants and non-participants. J Occup Environ Med1998;40:341–6.
93.
FriesJFMcShaneD. Reducing need and demand for medical services in high-risk persons: A health education approach. West J Med1998;169:201–7.
94.
GoetzelRZDunnRLOzminkowskiRJ. Differences between descriptive and multivariate estimates of the impact of Chevron Corporation's Health Quest Program on medical expenditures. J Occup Environ Med1998;40:538–45.