WilcoxLJ.Authorship: The coin of the realm, the source of complaints. J Am Med Assoc1998;280:216–217.
2.
HoenWPHenkCWOverbekeJPM. What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors' names?J Am Med Assoc1998;280:217–218.
3.
DrenthJPH. Multiple authorship: The contribution of senior authors. J Am Med Assoc1998;280:219–221.
4.
FlanaginACareyLAFontanarosaPB. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. J Am Med Assoc1998;280:222–224.
5.
PurcellGPDonovanSLDavidoffF. Changes to manuscripts during the editorial process: Characterizing the evolution of a clinical paper. J Am Med Assoc1998;280:227–228.
6.
CallahamMLBaxtWGWaeckerleJF. Reliability of editors' subjective quality rating of peer reviews of manuscripts. J Am Med Assoc1998;280:229–231.
7.
BlackNvan RooyenSGodleeF. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?J Am Med Assoc1998;280:231–233.
