KopsteinAGfroererJ. Drug use patterns and demographics of employed drug users: Data from the 1988 household survey. In: GustSWWalshJMThomasLBCrouchDJ, editors. Drugs in the workplace: Research and evaluation data, Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse1990. NIDA Research Monograph 100, vol 2:25–44.
2.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). National household survey on drug abuse: Main findings 1991. Rockville, Maryland: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 1993.
3.
NormandJLempertROO'BrienCP, editors. Under the influence? Drugs and the American work force. National Research Council/Institute of Medicine (NCR/IOM). Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994.
4.
RomanPMBlumTC. Drugs, the workplace, and employee-oriented programming. In: GersteinDRHarwoodHJ, editors. Treating drug problems, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1992. vol. 2, Committee for the Substance Abuse Coverage Study, pp. 197–244.
5.
BlumTCMartinJKRomanPM. A research note on EAP prevalence, components and utilization. Journal of Employee Assistance Research1992;1:209–29.
6.
BlumTCRomanPM. A description of clients using employee assistance programs. Alcohol Health and Research World.1992;16:120–8.
7.
FrenchMTZarkinGABrayJW. A methodology for evaluating the costs and benefits of employee assistance programs. Journal of Drug Issues1995;25: 451–70.
8.
BrayJWFrenchMTBowlandBJDunlapLJ. The cost of employee assistance programs (EAPs): Findings from seven case studies. Employee Assistance Quarterly. 1996;11.
9.
WalshDC. Employee assistance programs. Health and Society1982;60:492–517.
10.
DeckerJTStarrettRRedhorseJ. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of employee assistance programs. Social Work1986;31:391–3.
11.
HartwellTDSteelePFrenchMPotterFJZarkinGARodmanNF. Prevalence, cost, and characteristics of employee assistance programs (EAPs) in the US. Am J Public Health. [In press].
12.
Bureau of Labor Statistics . Survey of employer anti-drug programs. Report 760, US Government Printing Office, January, 1989.
13.
HaygheH. Anti-drug programs in the workplace: Are they here to stay?Monthly Labor Review1991;(April):26–8.
14.
BoyleKEPotterFJRushMSnodgrassJ. Sample selection and survey methodology for the 1992/1993 national survey of worksites and employee assistance programs. Unpublished manuscript, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Research Triangle Institute, 1994.
15.
ShahBVBarnwellBGHuntPNLaVaugeLM. SUDAAN user's manual, Release 5.50. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: Research Triangle Institute. 1991.
16.
PotterFJBoyleKESteelePDRushM. Characteristics of employee assistance programs (EAPs) in the US during 1993. Unpublished manuscript, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Research Triangle Institute, 1995.
17.
HartwellTDSteelePDRodmanNAFrenchMT. Prevalence and characteristics of alcohol and other drug testing programs in the US. Monthly Labor Review. [In press].
18.
WilliamsRLPerrittRL. “The weighted median test for finite population samples. Presented at 1986 American Statistical Association Joint Statistical Meetings.