Existing research on vocational rehabilitation following stroke has been criticised for not describing intervention in sufficient detail for replication or clinical implementation. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of recording and measuring the content of an early stroke-specific vocational rehabilitation intervention delivered to participants in a feasibility randomized controlled trial, using a proforma previously developed for a study of vocational rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury.
Method:
The proforma was adapted for use in stroke with input from an expert panel and was used to record intervention content, in 10-minute units, following each intervention session.
Findings:
Twenty-five people, working or in education at the time of stroke, participated in the study. Two thirds of the therapists' time was spent in face-to-face contact (43%) and liaison with the patient and others (20%). Intervention mainly focused on work preparation (21%) and the return to work process (24%). The remaining time was consumed by administration (19%) and travel (18%).
Conclusion:
The proforma was quick and easy to use and captured the main focus of intervention. This study suggests that it can be used to record stroke-specific vocational rehabilitation intervention content and has potential for wider use in research and clinical practice.
AlaszewskiAAlaszewskiHPotterJPenhaleB, (2007) Working after stroke: Survivors' experiences and perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(24), 1858–1869.
2.
BaldwinCBruscoNK, (2011) The effect of vocational rehabilitation on return-to-work rates post stroke: A systematic review. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 18(5), 562–572.
3.
BlackC, (2008) Working for a healthier tomorrow. London: TSO.
4.
BlackCFrostD, (2011) Health at work: An independent review of sickness absence in Great Britain. London: TSO.
5.
Care Quality Commission (2011) Supporting life after stroke: A review of services for people who have had a stroke and their carers. London: CQC.
CooleCRadfordKGrantMTerryJ, (2013) Returning to work after stroke: Perspectives of employer stakeholders, a qualitative study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 23(3), 406–418.
8.
DanielKWolfeCDBuschMAMcKevittC, (2009) What are the social consequences of stroke in working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke, 40(6), 431–440.
9.
Department of Health (2010) The NHS outcomes framework 2011/12. London: DH.
10.
Department of Health (2005) National service framework for long term conditions. London: DH.
11.
Department for Work and Pensions (2012) Disability employment support: Fulfilling potential. London: TSO.
12.
Department for Work and Pensions (2004) Building capacity for work: A UK framework for vocational rehabilitation. London: DWP.
13.
Department for Work and Pensions, Department of Health, Health and Safety Executive (2005) Health, work and wellbeing: Caring for our future. London: DWP.
14.
DeshpandePTurner-StokesL, (2004) Survey of vocational rehabilitation services available to people with acquired brain injury in the UK. In: TyermanAMeehanMJ, eds. Vocational assessment and rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: Inter-agency guidelines. London: RCP.
15.
DoucetTMullerFVerdun-EsquerCDebelleixXBrochardP, (2012) Returning to work after a stroke: A retrospective study at the Physical and Rehabilitation Center ‘La Tour de Gassies.’Annals of Physical Rehabilitation Medicine, 55(12), 112–127.
16.
FadylJKMcPhersonKM, (2009) Approaches to vocational rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: A review of the evidence. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24(3), 195–212.
17.
GrantMSinclairEWalkerM FRadfordKA, (2012) Vocational rehabilitation following stroke: Describing intervention. International Journal of Stroke, 7(Suppl 2), 29.
HartTDijkersMFraserRCiceroneKBognerJAWhyteJMalecJWaldronB, (2006) Vocational services for traumatic brain injury: Treatment definition, diversity within model systems of care. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 21(6), 467–482.
20.
LockSJordanLBryanKMaximJ, (2005) Work after stroke: Focusing on barriers and enablers. Disability and Society, 20(1), 33–47.
21.
Medical Research Council (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: New guidance. London: MRC.
PhillipsJDrummondARadfordKTyermanA, (2010) Return to work after traumatic brain injury: Recording, measuring and describing occupational therapy intervention. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(9), 422–430.
24.
PlayfordEDRadfordKBurtonCGibsonAJellieBSweetlandJWatkinsC, (2011) Mapping vocational rehabilitation services for people with long term neurological conditions: Summary report. London: DH. Available at: http://www.ltnc.org.uk/Research%20pages/mapping_vocational_rehab.html Accessed 10.12.12.
25.
RadfordKAPhillipsJDrummondASachTWalkerMTyermanAHaboubiNJonesT, (2013) Return to work after traumatic brain injury: Cohort comparison and economic evaluation. Brain Injury, 27(5), 507–520.
26.
RadfordKAWalkerMF, (2008) Impact of stroke on return to work. Brain Impairment, 9(2), 161–169.
27.
SaekiSToyonagaT, (2010) Determinants of early return to work after first stroke in Japan. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42(3), 254–258.
28.
ShererMEvansCCLeverenzJStouterJIrbyJWJrLeeJEYablonSA, (2007) Therapeutic alliance in post-acute brain injury rehabilitation: Predictors of strength of alliance and impact of alliance on outcome. Brain Injury, 21(7), 663–672.
TregerIShamesJGiaquintoSRingH, (2007) Return to work in stroke patients. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(17), 1397–1403.
31.
TyermanAMeehanMJ, (2004) Vocational assessment and rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: Inter-agency guidelines. London: RCP.
32.
VestlingMTufvessonBIwarssonS, (2003) Indicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35(3), 127–131.
WadeDT, (2003) Barriers to rehabilitation research, and overcoming them. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17(1), 1–4.
35.
WadeDT, (2001) Research into the black box of rehabilitation: The risks of a Type III error. Clinical Rehabilitation, 15(1), 1–4.
36.
WhyteJHartT, (2003) It's more than a black box; it's a Russsian doll: Defining rehabilitation treatments. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(8), 639–652.
