Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction:

Graduate records from Brunel University (United Kingdom) occupational therapy student cohorts from 1995–2005 were examined to discover the impact of practice placement marking on overall academic performance. Numeric grades for practice placements were introduced in 2000; prior to that, practice placement marks were recorded as either pass or fail.

Method:

1057 records were examined to compare whether overall academic averages differed between pre-practice marking and post-practice marking.

Findings:

Significant differences were discovered in the academic averages for 1995–99 (pass/fail) cohorts and 2000–04 (placement marking) cohorts. Further evaluation of the 2000–04 cohorts' marks (n = 593) revealed that practice placement marks contributed to that increase, and showed a significant rising trend when considered separately from marks from academic modules.

Conclusion:

An upward trend in practice placement marking can be seen, year on year, which indicates that grade inflation is present in practice placement marking.

Keywords

Student placements education marking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

College of Occupational Therapists (2008) College of Occupational Therapists pre-registration educational standards. 3rd ed. London: COT.

Dill

(2003) Allowing the market to rule: the case of the United States. Higher Education Quarterly, 57 (2), 136–157.

Donaldson

Gray

(2012) Systematic review of grading practice: is there evidence of grade inflation? Nurse Education in Practice, 12 (2), 101–114.

Elton

(2004) Should classification of the UK honours degree have a future? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (4), 415–422.

Elton

(1998) Are UK degree standards going up, down or sideways? Studies in Higher Education, (23)1, 35–42.

Health and Care Professions Council (2013) Standards of proficiency: occupational therapists. London: Health and Care Professions Council.

Jung

Tryssenaar

(1998) Supervising students: exploring the experience through reflective journals. Occupational Therapy International, 5 (1), 34–47.

Knight

(2001) A briefing on key concepts: formative and summative, criterion and norm-referenced assessment. LTSN Generic Centre: Assessment Series No. 7. Available at: http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/ftp/Resources/gc/assess07Keyconcepts[1].pdf Accessed 20.10.13.

Milton

Pollio

Eison

(1986) Making sense of college grades. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

10.

Pollio

Beck

(2000) When the tail wags the dog: perceptions of learning and grade orientation in, and by, contemporary college students and faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 71 (1), 84–102.

11.

Roman

Trevino

(2006) An approach to address grade inflation in a psychiatry clerkship. Academic Psychiatry, 30 (2), 110–115.

12.

Rosovsky

Hartley

(2002) Evaluation and the academy: are we doing the right thing? Grade inflation and letters of recommendation. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

13.

Speer

Solomon

Fincher

(2000) Grade inflation in internal medicine clerkships: results of a national survey. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 12 (3), 112–116.

14.

Thomas

Dickson

Broadbridge

Hopper

Hawkins

Edwards

McBryde

(2007) Benefits and challenges of supervising occupational therapy fieldwork students: supervisors' perspectives. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54 (Supplement 1), S2–S12.

15.

Walsh

Seldomridge

(2005) Clinical grades: upward bound. Journal of Nursing Education, 44 (4), 162–168.

16.

Waters

(2001) Radical action for radical plans. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64 (11), 577–578.

Do Occupational Therapy Graduates Benefit from Grade Inflation on Practice Placements?