This article describes the development of a first year occupational therapy module, ‘Participation in Occupations’, and the design and development of a mediating tool, Contexts of Participation: the Critical Thinking Tool, in a British university.
Method:
Using an action research process, the module content, learning and teaching strategy and new conceptual tools were designed to promote an enhanced understanding of the central importance of occupation to occupational therapy and, in particular, the role of participation in occupations in forming and reforming an individual within unique contextual situations. The inclusion of theory from disability studies and the use of a transformative approach to higher education were also investigated.
Findings and discussion:
The study spans 16 cohorts of students and reflects on the findings, which include increased client-centredness and greater appreciation of the complex nature of participation and its role in health and wellbeing.
British Broadcasting Corporation (1999) The disabled century. London: BBC.
2.
BrookfieldS (1987) Developing critical thinkers. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
3.
BrownTBoyleMWilliamsBMolloyAMcKennaLPalermoCMolloyL (2011) Listening and communication styles of undergraduate occupational therapy students: A cross—sectional study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(8), 387–93.
4.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (2002) Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Revised edition. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
5.
Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2008) Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
6.
Curry—StevensA (2007) New forms of transformative education: Pedagogy for the privileged. Journal of Transformative Education, 5(1), 33–58.
7.
GhulRMarshI (2007) Contexts of Participation: The critical thinking tool. Canterbury: Client Services, Canterbury Christ Church University.
8.
GhulRCramptonDHashemi—AhmadyAJarvisCSmithP (2010) Evaluating the Participation in Occupations service user and carer mini—conferences: A research informed teaching project. In: Graham—MathesonL, ed. Research—informed teaching: Exploring the concept. Canterbury: Canterbury Christ Church University.
9.
HammellKW (2006) Perspectives on disability and rehabilitation: Contesting assumptions: Challenging practice. 2nd ed.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
10.
HammellKW (2011) Resisting theoretical imperialism in the disciplines of occupational science and occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(1), 27–33.
11.
JägerS (2001) Discourse and knowledge: Theoretical and methodological aspects of critical discourse analysis. In: WodakRMeyerM, eds. Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.
12.
JohansdottirT (2010) Deviations from the conventional. In: EllisVEdwardsASmagorinskyP, eds. Cultural—historical perspectives in teacher education and development. London: Routledge.
13.
KielhofnerG (2002) Model of Human Occupation: Theory and application. 3rd ed.Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
14.
KrusenN (2011) The influence of environment on clinical practice: Unspoken rules. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(12), 546–53.
15.
MarmotMWilkinsonR, eds (2003) The social determinants of health: The solid facts. Geneva: World Health Organization.
16.
MarshI (2010) Suicide: Foucault, history and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
McCormackCCollinsB (2010) Can disability studies contribute to client—centred occupational therapy practice?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(7), 339–42.
18.
McNiffJWhiteheadJ (2002) Action research: Principles and practice. 2nd ed.London: RoutledgeFalmer.
19.
MeyerJLandR (2003) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines.Occasional Paper 4. Available at: http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/docs/ETLreport4.pdf Accessed 13.04.11.
20.
MezirowJ (2000) Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
21.
MingersJ (2000) What is it to be critical: Teaching a critical approach to management undergraduates. Management Learning, 31(2), 219–37.
22.
ParsonsT (1951) Illness and the role of the physician: A sociological perspective. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 21(3), 452–60.
23.
PerkinsD (1999) The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6–11.
24.
PierceD (2001) Occupation by design: Dimensions, therapeutic power, and creative process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(3), 249–59.
25.
RielM (2010) Understanding action research. Malibu, CA: Center for Collaborative Action Research, Pepperdine University. Available at: http://cadres.pepperdine.edu/ccar/define.html Accessed 10.02.12.
TannerB (2011) Threshold concepts in practice education: Perceptions of practice educators. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(9), 427–34.
28.
TrigwellKProsserMWaterhouseF (1999) Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57–70.
29.
VygotskyLS (1978) Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
World Health Organization (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: WHO.
31.
WilcockAA (1998) An occupational perspective of health. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
32.
WilcockAATownsendEA (2009) Occupational justice. In: CrepeauEBCohnESSchellBAB, eds. Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy. 11th ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
33.
YerxaE (1990) An introduction to occupational science, a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6(4), 1–17.
34.
Zuber—SkerrittO (1992) Action research in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
