Stroke is one of the most common disabling conditions of adulthood. Participation problems are extremely common post-stroke. Occupational therapists, by virtue of their commitment to enabling occupation, are in a strong position to help stroke survivors improve their participation. To demonstrate effectiveness, occupational therapists must be able to provide evidence of post-treatment changes in participation.
Objective:
The objective of this paper was to identify participation measures that have been developed for, or tested with, individuals who have experienced a stroke and to review them for use as occupational therapy outcome measures.
Method:
A literature review was carried out to locate relevant tools. These tools were then rated for psychometric and clinical properties that are critical for clinical outcome measurement. In addition, the theoretical fit of each evaluation with occupational therapy's commitment to client-centredness was considered.
Results:
Ten evaluations were identified and rated. These ratings were designed to assist occupational therapists to choose a participation measure for their practice.
Conclusion:
Selection and use of such a measure will help occupational therapists to document its effectiveness in improving participation among stroke survivors.
BaumCMEdwardsD (2001) Activity Card Sort (ACS): test manual. St Louis, MO: Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine.
2.
BéthouxFCalmelsPGautheronV (1999) Changes in quality of life of hemiplegic stroke patients with time: a preliminary report. American Journal of Physical Medical Rehabilitation, 78 (1), 19–23.
3.
CardolMde HaanRJvan den BosGAMde JongBAde GrootIJM (1999) The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clinical Rehabilitation, 13 (5), 411–19.
4.
CardolMBeelenAGeertrudisAvan den BosGAde JongBAde GrootIde HaanR (2002) Responsiveness of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83 (11), 1524–29.
5.
CarswellAMcCollMABaptisteSLawMPollockN (2004) The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71 (4), 210–23.
6.
ChanVWLChungJCCPackerTL (2006) Validity and reliability of the Activity Card Sort — Hong Kong Chinese version. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 26 (4), 152–58.
7.
ChenY-HRogersSPolatajkoH (2002) Experiences with the COPM and client-centred practice in adult neurorehabilitation in Taiwan. Occupational Therapy International, 9 (3), 167–84.
DaneskiKCoshallCTillingKWolfeCD (2003) Reliability and validity of a postal version of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index, modified for use with stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17 (8), 835–39.
11.
DesrosiersNNoreauLRochetteABravoGBoutinC (2002) Predictors of handicap situations following post-stroke rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24 (15), 774–85.
12.
DesrosiersJMalouinFBourbonnaisDRichardsCLRochetteABravoG (2003) Arm and leg impairments and disabilities after stroke rehabilitation: relation to handicap. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17 (6), 666–73.
13.
DesrosiersJNoreauLRobichaudLFougeyrollasPRochetteAViscogiosiC (2004) Validity of the assessment of life habits in older adults. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 36 (4), 177–82.
14.
EganMKesslerDLaporteLMetcalfeVCarterM (2007) A pilot randomized controlled trial of community-based occupational therapy in late stroke rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 14 (5), 37–45.
15.
FeiginLLawesCMMBennettDAAndersonCS (2003) Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. The Lancet Neurology, 2 (1), 43–53.
16.
FougeyrollasPNoreauLBergeronHCloutierRDionS-ASt MichelG (1998) Social consequences of long-term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 21 (2), 127–41.
17.
GompertzPPoundPEbrahimS (1994) Validity of the Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale. Clinical Rehabilitation, 8 (4), 275–80.
18.
GrayDBHollingsworthHHStarkSLMorganKA (2006) Participation Survey/Mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87 (2), 189–97.
19.
GreenJForsterAYoungJ (2001) A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Index in stroke patients. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23 (15), 670–76.
20.
Hartman-MaeirAEliadYKizoniRNahaloniIKelbermanHKatzN (2007) Evaluation of a long-term community based rehabilitation program for adult stroke survivors. NeuroRehabilitation, 22 (4), 295–301.
21.
HarwoodRHEbrahimS (2000) A comparison of the responsiveness of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale, London Handicap Scale and SF-36. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22 (17), 786–93.
22.
HarwoodRHGompertzPEbrahimS (1994a) Handicap one year after stroke: validity of a new scale. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 57 (7), 825–29.
23.
HarwoodRRogersADickinsonEEbrahimS (1994b) Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Quality in Health Care, 3 (1), 11–16.
24.
HolbrookMSkilbeckCE (1983) An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 12 (2), 166–70.
25.
JenkinsonCMantJCarterJWadeDWinnerS (2000) The London Handicap Scale: a re-evaluation of its validity using standard scoring and simple summation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 68 (3), 365–67.
26.
KatzNKarpinHLakAFurmanTHartman-MaeirA (2003) Participation in occupational performance: reliability and validity of the Activity Card Sort. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 23 (1), 10–17.
27.
KerstenPGeorgeSLowJAshburnAMcLellanL (2004) The Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome: its usefulness in a younger stroke population. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 27 (1), 59–63.
28.
KerstenPCardolMGeorgeSWardCSibleyAWhiteB (2007) Validity of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire: a comparison between two countries. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29 (19), 1502–09.
29.
KirshnerBGuyattG (1985) A methodological framework for evaluating health indices. Journal of Chronic Disease, 38 (1), 27–36.
30.
LawMBaptisteSCarswellAMcCollMAPolatajkoHPollockH (2005) Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 4th ed.Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.
31.
LincolnNGladmanJ (1992) The Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale: a further validation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 14 (1), 41–43.
32.
MagasiSPostMW (2010) A comparative review of contemporary participation measures' psychometric properties and content coverage. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91 (9) (Suppl. 1), S17–S28.
33.
MayoNEWood-DauphineeSAhmedSGordonCHigginsJMcEwenSSalbachN (1999) Disablement following stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21 (5–6), 258–68.
34.
MayoNEWood-DauphineeSCoteRDurcamLCarletonJ (2002) Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months post stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83 (8), 1035–42.
35.
MorrisMPerryMUnsworthCSkeatJDuncombeSDuckettS (2005) Reliability of the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for quantifying disability and health. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 12 (8), 340–46.
36.
NoreauLDesrosiersJRobichaudLFougeyrollasPRochetteAViscogiosiC (2004) Measuring social participation: reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26 (6), 346–52.
37.
NouriFLincolnN (1987) An Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale for stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1 (4), 301–05.
38.
PackerTLBoshoffKDeJongeD (2008) Development and validity of the Activity Card Sort — Australia. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 55 (3), 199–206.
39.
PerryAMorrisMUnsworthCDuckettSSkeatJDoddKTaylorNRileyK (2004) Therapy outcome measures for allied health practitioners in Australia: the AusTOMs. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 16 (4), 285–91.
40.
PiercyMCarterJMantJWadeDT (2000) Inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay Activities Index in patients with stroke and their carers. Clinical Rehabilitation, 14 (4), 433–40.
41.
PostMWMde WitteLP (2003) Good inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17 (5), 548–52.
42.
RochetteADesrosiersJBravoGSt-Cyr-TribbleDBourgetA (2007) Changes in participation after a mild stroke: quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 14 (3), 59–68.
43.
SachsDJosmanN (2003) The Activity Card Sort: a factor analysis. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 23 (4), 165–74.
44.
SalterKJutaiJWTeasellRFoleyNCBitenskyJBayleyM (2005) Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF participation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27 (9), 507–28.
45.
SchepersVPMKetelaarMVisser-MielyJMADekkerJLindemanE (2006) Responsiveness of health status measures frequently used in stroke research. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28 (17), 1035–40.
46.
SchulingJde HaanRLimburgMGroenierKH (1993) The Frenchay Activities Index. Assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke, 24 (8), 1173–77.
47.
SibleyAKerstenPWardCWhiteBMehtaRGeorgeS (2006) Measuring autonomy in disabled people: validation of a new scale in a UK population. Clinical Rehabilitation, 20 (9), 793–803.
48.
StarkSLSanfordJA (2005) Environment enablers and their impact on occupational performance. In: ChristiansenCHBaumCM, eds. Occupational therapy: performance, participation and well-being. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
49.
StarkSLEdwardsDFHollingsworthHGrayDB (2005) Validation of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index in a population of community-dwelling people with mobility limitations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86 (2), 344–45.
50.
SteinerARaubeKStuckAEAronowHUDraperDRubensteinLZBeckJC (1996) Measuring psychosocial aspects of well-being in older community residents: performance of four short scales. The Gerontologist, 36 (1), 54–62.
51.
StreinerDLNormanGR (2008) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
SturmJWDonnanGADeweyHMMacdonnellRALGilliganAKThriftAG (2004) Determinants of handicap after stroke: the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke, 35 (3), 715–20.
53.
ThebenJW (2006) A pilot study of the effectiveness of the ‘Finding meaning in doing after stroke’ self-help workbook. Unpublished Master's thesis. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University.
54.
ThomasSAMooreKNayRHawthorneGFondaD (2004) National Continence Management Strategy: selection of our measurement suite. Canberra: Australian Goverment Department of Health and Ageing.
55.
TriggRWoodVA (2000) The Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO): a new measure for use with stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 14 (3), 288–299.
56.
TriggRWoodVA (2003) The validation of the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO). Clinical Rehabilitation, 17 (3), 283–89.
57.
TriggRWoodVAHewerRL (1999) Social reintegration after stroke: the first stages in the development of the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO). Clinical Rehabilitation, 13 (4), 341–53.
58.
UnsworthCA (2006) Measuring outcomes using the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT): data description and tool sensitivity. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68 (8), 354–66.
59.
UnsworthC (2008) Using the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT) to measure outcomes for clients following stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 15 (4), 351–64.
60.
UnsworthCDuncombeD (2005) A comparison of client outcomes from two acute care neurological services using self-care data from the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT). British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68 (10), 477–82.
61.
UnsworthCADuncombeD (2007) AusTOMs for Occupational Therapy. 2nd ed.Melbourne: La Trobe University.
62.
UnsworthCADuckettSHDuncombeDPerryASkeatJTaylorN (2004) Validity of the AusTOM Scales: a comparison of the AusTOMs and the EuroQuol-5D. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2 (1), 64.
63.
UnsworthCALovellRTerringtonNThomasS (2005) Review of tests contributing to the occupational therapy off-road driver assessment. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52 (1), 57–74.
64.
WalkerMFDrummondAERGattJSackleyCM (2000) Occupational therapy for stroke patients: a survey of current practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63 (8), 367–72.
65.
Wood-DauphineeSWilliamsJI (1987) Reintegration to Normal Living as a proxy to quality of life. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40 (6), 491–99.
66.
Wood-DauphineeSLOpzoomerMAWilliamsJIMarchandBSpitzerWO (1988) Assessment of global function: the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69 (8), 583–90.
67.
World Health Organisation (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Web (ICF). Available at: http://www3.who.int/icf/icftemplate.cfm Accessed 23.11.10.
68.
WuCChuangLLinKLeSHongW (2011) Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in patients with improved performance after stroke rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92 (8), 1281–87.
