In a major Canadian jurisdiction that includes several regions, an intersectoral working group with community partners was formed to enable change in systems and policies for individuals with serious and persistent mental illness. The top priority of the working group was housing.
Purpose:
The study explored how the working group members experienced decision-making power in their efforts to enable change in housing policies.
Method:
The research used a qualitative single-case design to study the decision-making processes as experienced by the group members. Data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews, two focus groups and review of key public documents. The data were analysed using the constant comparative method, with critical reflection on group decision making and the contextual influences of system-level policies. Group members contributed to the analysis.
Findings:
Amid positive experiences of working together, group members experienced challenges related to power differentials between service providers, government personnel and consumers, and the impact of the systemic environment on the group processes.
Implications:
Implications are raised for occupational therapy education and practice, and for studying group decision making as an occupation.
AuerbachC FSilversteinLB (2003) Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.
2.
BarbaraAWhitefordG (2005) The legislative and policy context of practice. In: WhitefordGWright-St ClairV, eds. Occupation and practice in context. Sydney: Elsevier Australia, 332–48.
3.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (2002) Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Rev. ed.Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
4.
Canadian Mental Health Association/Prince Edward Island Division (2004) Pain, perseverance and passion: A report on the support needs of individuals with severe and persistent mental illness on Prince Edward Island. Charlottetown: CMHA, PEI Division.
5.
ChurchKRevilleD (1989) User involvement in the mental health field in Canada. Canada's Mental Health, 37(2), 22–25.
6.
ClarkCCKrupaT (2002) Reflections on empowerment in community mental health: Giving shape to an elusive idea. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25(4), 341–49.
7.
DePoyEGitlinL (2005) Introduction to research: Understanding and applying multiple strategies. 3rd ed. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
8.
FontanaAFreyJ (2000) The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 645–72.
9.
HammellWK (2008) Reflections on … Well-being and occupational rights. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(1), 61–64.
10.
HellriegelDSlocumJWoodmanRBruningS (1998) Organizational behavior. Canadian 8th ed. Scarborough, ON: Nelson.
11.
HoneyA (1999) Empowerment versus power: Consumer participation in mental health services. Occupational Therapy International, 6(4), 257–76.
12.
JacobsonN (2003) Defining recovery: An interactionist analysis of mental health policy development, Wisconsin 1996–1999. Qualitative Health Research, 13(3), 378–93.
13.
JanesickV (1994) The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodology, and meaning. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 209–19.
14.
KielhofnerG (2005) Scholarship and practice: Bridging the divide. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(2), 231–39.
15.
KirbyM (2006) Out of the shadows at last: Transforming mental health, mental illness and addiction services in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology.
16.
LabonteR (2007) Community development and the forming of authentic partnerships. In: MinklerM, ed. Community organizing and community building for health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 88–102.
MathewsNFoxNHunnA (2002) Trent Focus for research and development in primary health care: Using interviews in a research project. Trent Focus. Available at: http://www.trentfocus.org.uk/resources/resource_packs.htm Accessed 01.03.05.
19.
SilvermanD (2001) Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
20.
SkeggsB (2002) Techniques for telling the reflexive self. In: MayT, ed. Qualitative research in action. London: Sage, 349–74.
21.
SmythGHarriesPDorerG (2011) Exploring mental health service users' experiences of social inclusion in their community occupations. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(7), 323–31.
22.
SpeerPWHugheyJ (1995) Community organizing: An ecological route to empowerment and power. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 729–48.
23.
StakeRE (2000) Case studies. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 435–54.
24.
StringfellowJMuscariK (2003) A program of support for consumer participation in systems change. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 14(3), 142–47.
25.
TownsendE (1998) Good intentions overruled: A critique of empowerment in the routine organization of mental health services. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
26.
TownsendEPolatajkoH (2007) Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, and justice through occupation. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
27.
TownsendECockburnLLettsLThibeaultRTrenthamB (2007) Enabling social change. In: TownsendEPolatajkoH, eds. Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, and justice through occupations. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE, 153–71.
28.
TraversM (2001) Qualitative research through case studies. London: Sage.
29.
WielkiewiczRStelznerS (2005) An ecological perspective on leadership theory, research and practice. Review of General Psychology, 9(4), 326–41.
30.
WilcockA (2006) An occupational perspective of health. 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
31.
World Health Organisation (1989) Health principles of housing. Geneva: WHO.
32.
ZubritskyCMullahyMAllenMAlfanoE (2006) The state of the Olmstead Decision and the impact of consumer participation in planning. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 9(2), 131–43.
