Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2010-11
Implementing the Model of Human Occupation across a Mental Health Occupational Therapy Service: Communities of Practice and a Participatory Change Process
The implementation of evidence-based change in practice settings is complex and far reaching, but only limited research has been undertaken in this area. This participatory action research study investigated the implementation of the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO) across a mental health occupational therapy service.
Method:
The study involved preparatory workshops and 12 months of team-based, monthly group reflective supervision sessions, facilitated by a colleague from academia, with follow-up contact for a further 12 months.
Findings:
The main findings emphasise the importance of developing a critical learning space, or ‘community of practice’, and identify that barriers to theory implementation can be overcome by collective effort with a shared dialectic. The successful development of a community of practice required the careful consideration of a number of interconnected influences, including those of self, peer and facilitator, and contextual and theoretical relationships.
Conclusion:
The study concluded that the community of practice was central in supporting the effective implementation of MOHO and its associated assessment tools. A key output of the study is a Participatory Change Process, which illustrates the key steps undertaken and interrelated factors affecting theory uptake. The process requires further testing, but has potential to guide theory implementation in other settings.
AndresenLFredericksI (2001) Finding the fifth player: Artistry in professional practice. In: HiggsJTitchenA, eds. Professional practice in health, education and the arts. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
2.
ArgyrisCSchönD (1974) Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. London: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BanduraA (1989) Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of personal agency. The Psychologist, 2(10), 411–24.
4.
BanduraA (1997) Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5.
BonifaceGFeddenTHurstHMasonMPhelpsCReagonCWaygoodS (2008) Using theory to underpin an integrated occupational therapy service through the Canadian model of occupational performance. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(12), 531–39.
6.
BrownBCrawfordPDarongkamasJ (2000) Blurred roles and permeable boundaries: The experience of multidisciplinary working in community mental health. Health and Social Care in the Community, 8(6), 425–35.
7.
BrownGTRodgerSBrownARoeverC (2005) A comparison of Canadian and Australian paediatric occupational therapists. Occupational Therapy International, 12(3), 137–61.
8.
CarrW (1986) Theories of theory and practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 20(20), 177–86.
9.
ChardG (2000) An investigation into the use of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) in clinical practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(10), 481–88.
10.
ChardG (2004) Implementing the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) in the workplace: A comparison of the experience of occupational therapists and new graduates. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(2), 54–64.
11.
ChardG (2006) Adopting the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills into practice: Therapists' voices. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(2), 50–57.
12.
College of Occupational Therapists (2006) Recovering ordinary lives: A vision for the next ten years. London: COT.
13.
CousinG (2006) Threshold concepts, troublesome knowledge and emotional capital: An exploration into learning about others. In: MeyerJHFLandR, eds. Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Oxford: Routledge Falmer.
14.
CousinG (2009) Strategies for researching learning in higher education: An introduction to contemporary methods and approaches. London: Routledge.
15.
CraikCChacksfieldJDRichardsG (1998) A survey of occupational therapy practitioners in mental health. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(5), 227–34.
Department of Health (2005b) New ways of working for psychiatrists: Enhancing effective person-centred services through new ways of working in multidisciplinary and multi-agency contexts. London: DH.
Department of Health (2007b) Creating capable teams approach (CCTA): Best practice guidance to support new ways of working (NWW) and new roles. London: DH.
22.
DuncanEAS, ed (2006) Foundations for practice in occupational therapy. 4th ed.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
23.
DunningMAbi-AadGGilbertDGilliamsSLivettH (1998) Turning evidence into everyday practice. London: King's Fund.
24.
DunroseSLeesonJ (2002) Differentiating work in mental health settings. (Letter.)British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(3), 150.
25.
ElliottSJVeldeBWittmanPP (2002) The use of theory in everyday practice: An exploratory study. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 16(1), 45–62.
26.
FinlayL (1993) Groupwork in occupational therapy. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.
27.
ForsythKMannSummerfield LKielhofnerG (2005) Scholarship of practice: Making occupation-focused, theory-driven and evidence-based practice a reality. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(6), 260–68.
28.
FortuneT (2000) Occupational therapists: Is our therapy truly occupational or are we merely filling gaps?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(5), 225–30.
29.
FriereP (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum Publishing Company.
30.
GubaE (1990) The paradigm dialogue. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
HagedornR (1997) Occupational therapy: Perspectives and processes. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
32.
HaglundLEkbladhEThorellLHallbergIR (2000) Practice models in Swedish psychiatric occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 7(3), 107–13.
33.
HaglundLHenrikssonCCrispMFreidheimLKielhofnerG (2001) The Occupational Circumstances Assessment — Interview and Rating Scale (OCAIRS) (version 2.0). Chicago: Model of Human Occupation Clearing House, Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Applied Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago.
34.
HarriesPGilhoolyK (2003) Generic and specialist occupational therapy casework in community mental health teams. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(3), 101–09.
35.
HeronJReasonP (2001) The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research ‘with’ rather than ‘on’ people. In: ReasonPBradburyH, eds. Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.
36.
HiggsJAndresenLFishD (2004) Practice knowledge — its nature, sources and contexts. In: HiggsJRichardsonBDahlgrenAbrandt M, eds. Developing practice knowledge for health professionals. London: Butterworth Heinemann.
37.
HughesJ (2001) Occupational therapy in community mental health teams: A continuing dilemma? Role theory offers an explanation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(1), 34–40.
38.
HunterEPBlairSE (1999) Staff supervision for occupational therapists. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(8), 344–50.
39.
IlottIWhiteE (2001) College of Occupational Therapists' research and development strategic vision and action plan. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(6), 270–77.
40.
KemmisSMcTaggartR (2005) Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In: DenzinNLincolnY, eds. Handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 559–603.
LeeSWTaylorRKielhofnerGFisherG (2008) Theory in practice: A national survey of therapists who use the Model of Human Occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(1), 106–17.
46.
LloydCWilliamsPL (2009) The future of occupational therapy in mental health in Ireland. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(12), 539–42.
47.
McCluskeyA (2003) Occupational therapists report a low level of knowledge, skill and involvement in evidence based practice. Australian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50(1), 3–12.
48.
McCollMA (2003) The occupational therapy toolbox: Uses of theory in occupational therapy. In: McCollMALawMCDoubtLPollockNStewardD, eds. Theoretical basis of occupational therapy. 2nd ed.Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 7–10.
49.
McDermottR (1999) Nurturing three dimensional communities of practice: How to get the most out of human networks. Knowledge Management Review, 12(5), 26–30.
50.
McTaggartR (1997) Guiding principles for participatory action research. In: McTaggartR, ed. Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences. New York: State University of New York.
51.
MetcalfCPerrySBanniganKLewinRJPWisherSMoffattKlaber J (2001) Barriers to implementing the evidence base in four NHS therapies. Physiotherapy, 87(8), 433–41.
52.
MeyerJHFLandR (2006) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Issues of liminality. In: MeyerJHFLandR, eds. Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.
53.
O'ConnellJEMcKayEA (2010) Profile, practice and perspectives of occupational therapists in community mental health teams in Ireland. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(5), 219–28.
54.
OxmanADavisDHayesRThomsonM (1995) No magic bullets: A systematic review of 102 trials of intervention to help health professions deliver services more effectively or efficiently. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 153(10), 1423–43.
55.
ParkerH (2001) The role of occupational therapists in community mental health teams: Generic or specialist?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(12), 609–11.
56.
ParkinsonSLoweCKeysK (2010) Professional development enhances the occupational therapy work environment. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(10), 470–76.
57.
PetticanABryantW (2007) Sustaining a focus on occupation in community mental health practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(4), 140–46.
58.
ReasonP (1994) Participation in human inquiry. London: Sage.
59.
ReevesSMannSummerfield L (2004) Overcoming problems with generic working for occupational therapists based in community mental health settings. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(6), 265–68.
60.
RichardsonBHiggsJDahlgrenAbrandt M (2004) Recognising practice epistemology in the health professions. In: HiggsJRichardsonBDahlgrenAbrandt M, eds. Developing practice knowledge for health professionals. London: Butterworth Heinemann.
61.
RobertsA (2002) Advancing practice through continuing professional education: The case for reflection. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(5), 237–41.
62.
Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health (2001) The capable practitioner report. London: SCMH.
63.
Savin-BadenM (2008) Learning spaces: Creating opportunities for knowledge creation in academic life. Maidenhead: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
64.
Savin-BadenMWimpennyK (2007) Exploring and implementing participatory action research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2), 331–43.
65.
SchönDA (1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.
66.
StorchBAEskowGoldrich K (1995) Theory application by school based occupational therapists. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50(8), 662–68.
67.
SweeneyGWebleyPTreacherA (2001) Supervision in occupational therapy, part 3: Accommodating the supervisor and supervisee. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(9), 426–31.
68.
UsherRBryantIJohnstoneR (1997) Adult education and the postmodern challenge: Learning beyond the limits. London: Routledge.
69.
WalkerMFDrummondAERGattJSackleyCM (2000) Occupational therapy for stroke patients: A survey of current practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(8), 367–72.
70.
WengerE (1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
WimpennyK (2009) Participatory change: An integrated approach toward occupational therapy practice development. (Unpublished PhD thesis.) Coventry: Coventry University.
72.
WimpennyK (2010) Participatory action research: An integrated approach towards practice development. In: Savin-BadenMMajorC, eds. New approaches to qualitative research: Wisdom and uncertainty. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis, 89–99.
73.
WimpennyKForsythKJonesCEvansEColleyJ (2006) Thinking with theory to develop practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(6), 423–28.
74.
WinshipGHardyS (1999) Disentangling dynamics: Group sensitivity and supervision. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 6(4), 307–12.
75.
WyeLMcClenahanJ (2000) Getting better with evidence — experiences of putting evidence into practice. London: King's Fund.
