Occupational therapists frequently cite a ‘client-centred’ approach as a fundamental aspect of their practice. However, there are many examples in the narratives of disabled people that suggest that the health and social care services they experience do not quite meet this aspiration. The authors propose that an understanding of disability from disabled people's perspectives is elemental to client-centred practice and that knowledge of the academic discipline of disability studies can contribute to authentic client-centred occupational therapy.
AbberleyP (1995) Disabling ideology in health and welfare – the case of occupational therapy. Disability and Society, 10(2), 221–32.
2.
AbberleyP (2004) A critique of professional support and intervention. In: SwainJFrenchSBarnesCThomasC, eds. Disabling barriers – enabling environments. 2nd ed. London: Sage, ch. 36.
3.
AlbrechtGLSeelmanKDBuryM (2001) Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
BeresfordP (2004) Treatment at the hands of professionals. In: SwainJFrenchSBarnesCThomasC, eds. Disabling barriers – enabling environments. 2nd ed. London: Sage, ch. 37.
6.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (1997, 2002) Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
7.
CharltonJI (1998) Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8.
CraddockJ (1996a) Responses of the occupational therapy profession to the perspective of the disability movement, part 1. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(1), 17–22.
9.
CraddockJ (1996b) Responses of the occupational therapy profession to the perspective of the disability movement, part 2. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(2), 73–78.
10.
FinkelsteinV (1998) Emancipating disability studies. In: ShakespeareT, ed. The disability studies reader: Social science perspectives. London: Cassell.
11.
FrenchS (1994) Disabled people and professional practice. In: FrenchS, ed. On equal terms: Working with disabled people. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 103–18.
12.
GillmanM (2004) Diagnosis and assessment in the lives of disabled people: Creating potentials/limiting possibilities? In: SwainJFrenchSBarnesCThomasC, eds. Disabling barriers – enabling environments. 2nd ed. London: Sage, ch. 38.
13.
HammellK (2006) Perspectives on disability and rehabilitation: Contesting assumptions; challenging practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
14.
HuntJ (1996) Joining in the dialogue set by disabled people. (Letter.)British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(5), 243.
15.
JongbloedLCrichtonA (1990) A new definition of disability: Implications for rehabilitation practice and social policy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(1), 32–38.
16.
KielhofnerG (2005) Rethinking disability and what to do about it: Disability studies and its implications for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(5), 487–96.
17.
LawMBaptisteSMillsJ (1995) Client-centred practice: What does it mean and does it make a difference?Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(5), 250–57.
18.
LintonSMelloSO'NeillJ (1994) Locating disability in diversity. In: MakasESchlesingerL, eds. Insights and outlooks: Current trends in disability studies. Portland, ME: Society for Disability Studies/Edmund S Muskie Institute of Public Affairs. Cited In: PfeifferDYoshidaK(1995) Teaching disability studies in Canada and the USA. Disability and Society, 10(4), 475–500.
19.
LundMLNygårdL (2004) Occupational life in the home environment: The experiences of people with disabilities. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(4), 243–51.
20.
MorrisJ (1991) Pride against prejudice: Transforming attitudes to disability. London: The Women's Press.
21.
OliverM (1990) The politics of disablement. London: Macmillan.
22.
ReindalSM (1999) Independence, dependence, interdependence: Some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy. Disability and Society, 14(3), 353–67.
23.
ShakespeareT (2006) Disability rights and wrongs. London: Routledge.
24.
SumsionTLawM (2006) A review of the evidence on the conceptual elements informing client centred practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(3), 153–62.
25.
SwainJFrenchS (2000) Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability and Society, 15(4), 569–82.
26.
SwainJFrenchSCameronC (2003) Controversial issues in a disabling society. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
27.
ThompsonN (1998) Promoting equality: Challenging discrimination and oppression in the human services. Houndmills: Macmillan.
28.
TrickettEJWattsRJBirdmanD, eds (1994) Toward an overarching framework for diversity. Human diversity perspectives on people in context. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Cited In: LintonS(1998) Disability studies/not disability studies. Disability and Society, 13(4), 525–40.
29.
WhitefordGEWilcockAA (2000) Cultural relativism: Occupation and independence reconsidered. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(5), 324–36.
