Top-down or Bottom-up Occupational Therapy Assessment: Which Way Do We Go?

Abstract

Keywords

Assessment occupational performance top-down and bottom-up assessments

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chard

(2000) An investigation into the use of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) in clinical practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(10), 481–88.

Hocking

(2001) Implementing occupation-based assessment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(4), 463–69.

Stewart

(1999) The use of standardised and non-standardised assessments in a social services setting: Implications for practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(9), 417–23.

Tam

Teachman

Wright

(2008) Paediatric application of individualised client-centred outcome measures: A literature review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(7), 286–96.

Trombly

(1993) Anticipating the future: Assessment of occupational function. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(3), 253–57.

Weinstock-Zlotnick

Hinojosa

(2004) Bottom-up or top-down evaluation: Is one better than the other? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(5), 594–99.

World Health Organisation (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO.