AlderseaP (1996) Report on NHS Prosthetic and wheelchair services. Occupational Therapy News, 4(2), 5.
2.
AlderseaPHamRWhiteE (1999) Provision of electrically powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 6(4), 192–98.
3.
ArkseyHKnightP (1999) Interviewing for social scientists. London: Sage.
4.
Audit Commission (2000) Fully equipped: The provision of equipment to older or disabled people by the NHS and Social Services in England and Wales. London: Audit Commision.
5.
AzjenI (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–83.
6.
BaileyDM (1991) Research for the health professional: A practical guide. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
7.
Beaumont-WhiteSHamRO (1997) Powered wheelchairs: Are we enabling or disabling?Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 21(1), 62–73.
8.
BossTMFinlaysonM (2006) Responses to the acquisition and use of powered mobility by individuals who have multiple sclerosis and their families. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(3), 349–57.
9.
BottosMBolcatiCSciutoLRuggeriCFeliciangeliA (2001) Powered wheelchairs and independence in young children with tetraplegia. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 43(11), 769–77.
10.
BraceNKempRSnelgarR (2003) SPSS for psychologists: A guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. 2nd ed.London: Macmillan.
11.
BrandtAIwarssonSStahleA (2004) Older people's use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 36(2), 70–77.
12.
BruceABorgB (2002) Psychosocial frames of reference: Core for occupation based practice. 3rd ed.Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
13.
BuningMAngelaJSchmelerM (2001) Occupational performance and the transition to powered mobility: A pilot study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(3), 339–44.
14.
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (1991) Occupational therapy guidelines for client-centred practice. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications.
15.
CarswellAMcCollMABaptisteSLawMPolatajkoHPollockN (2004) The Canadian Occupational Performance Model: A research and clinical literature review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(4), 210–14.
16.
Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC)International Conference on Harmonisation: Good clinical practice guidelines. Available at: http://www.corec.org.uk Accessed on 19.09.08. Equivalent content at the National Research Ethics Service (which replaces COREC). Available at: http://www.nres.npsa.nhs.uk/rec-community/guidance/#PIS Accessed on 20.02.09.
17.
ChapparoCRankaJ (1996) The Perceive, Recall, Plan and Perform System of Task Analysis. In: ChapparoCRankaJ (1997) Occupational Performance Model (Australia). Monograph 1. Sydney: Total Print Control, 189–98.
18.
ChapparoCRankaJ (1997) Occupational Performance Model (Australia). Monograph 1. Sydney: Total Print Control, 189–98.
19.
ClarkeC (2009) An introduction to interpretative phenomenological analysis: A useful approach for occupational therapy research. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(1), 37–39.
20.
College of Occupational Therapists (2005) Code of ethics and professional conduct. London: COT.
21.
CooperRAThormanTCooperRDvorznakMJFitzgeraldSGAmmerWSong-FengGBoningerML (2002) Driving characteristics of electric powered wheelchair users: How far, fast and often do people drive?Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(2), 250–55.
22.
CotterillPLetherbyG (1994) The person in the researcher. In: BurgessR, ed. Studies in qualitative methodology, 4. London: Jai Press, 107–36.
23.
CreswellJW (1998) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage.
24.
DaviesADe SouzaLFrankA (2003) Changes in the quality of life in severely disabled people following provision of powered indoor/outdoor chairs. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(6), 286–90.
25.
DeddingCCardolMEyssenICMJDekkerJBeelenA (2004) Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: A client-centred outcome measurement. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18(6), 660–67.
26.
De SouzaLDavisAFrankA (2003) Assessing health states and quality of life changes for carers of new recipients of electric powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs. London: Centre for Research in Rehabilitation, Brunel University.
27.
DunnWBrownCMcGuiganA (1994) The ecology of human performance: A framework for considering the effect of context. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48(7), 595–607.
28.
Empower (2004) NHS Wheelchair and Seating Services Mapping Project final report. London: Limbless Association Rehabilitation Centre.
29.
EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol: A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16, 199–208.
30.
EvansR (2000) The effect of electrically-powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs on occupation: A study of users' views. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(11), 547–53.
31.
EyssenICMJBeelenADeddingCCardolMDekkeerJ (2005) The reproducibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Clinical Rehabilitation, 19(8), 888–94.
32.
FarquharM (1995) Definitions of quality of life: A taxonomy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(3), 502–08.
FrankAOWardJOrwellNJMcCullaghCBelcherM (2000) Introduction of a new NHS electric-powered indoor/outdoor chair (EPIOC) service: Benefits, risks and implications for prescribers. Clinical Rehabilitation, 14(6), 665–73.
35.
GamaEVDamianJEde MolinoJ PerezLopezMRPerezM LopezInglesiasFJ Gavira (2000) Association of individual activities of daily living with self rated health in older people. Age and Ageing, 29(3), 267–70.
36.
GelderMGathDMayouRCowenP (1996) Oxford textbook of psychiatry. 3rd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
GiorgiAGiorgiB (2003) Phenomenology. In: SmithJ, ed. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. London: Sage, ch. 3.
38.
GraffMJLVernooij-DassenMJMThijssenMDekkerJHoefnagelsWHLOldeRikkertMJM (2007) Effects of community occupational therapy on quality of life, mood, and health status in dementia patients and their caregivers: A randomized controlled trial. Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 62, 1002–09.
39.
Great Britain Parliament (1977) National Health Service Act 1977. London: HMSO.
40.
Great Britain Parliament (1995) Disability Discrimination Act 1995. London: HMSO.
41.
Great Britain Parliament (1998) Data Protection Act 1998. London: HMSO.
42.
Great Britain Parliament (2005) Disability Discrimination Act 2005. London: The Stationery Office.
43.
GreenSCooperB Acheson (2000) Occupation as a quality of life constituent: A nursing home perspective. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(1), 17–24.
44.
GreggEWKriskaAMFoxKMCauleyJA (1996) Self-rated health and the spectrum of physical activity and physical function in older women. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 4(4), 349–61.
45.
KweeHo HanKozoMatsubayashiTaizoWadaMiyukiKimuraToruKitaKiyofumiSaijoh (2002) Factors associated with ADL independence: A comparative study of residential care home and community-dwelling elderly in Japan. Geriatrics and Gerontology International, 2(2), 80–86.
46.
HardyP (2004) Powered wheelchair mobility: An occupational performance evaluation perspective. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 51(1), 34–42.
47.
HoarePRussellM (1995) The quality of life of children with chronic epilepsy and their families: Preliminary findings with a new assessment measure. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 37(8), 689–96.
48.
HoeymansNFeskensEJKromhoutDVan den BosGA (1997) Ageing and the relationship between functional status and self-rated health in elderly men. Social Science and Medicine, 45(10), 1527–36.
49.
JetteAM (1994) Physical disablement concepts for physical therapy research and practice. Physical Therapy, 74(5), 380–86.
50.
KielhofnerG (2004) Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. 3rd ed.Philadelphia: FA Davis.
51.
KielhofnerGBurkeJP (1980) A Model of Human Occupation, Part 1: Conceptual framework and content. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34(9), 572–81.
52.
KornerJ (2004) Hard pushed: How the NHS fails powered wheelchair users. London: Muscular Dystrophy Group of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
53.
LawM (1991) The environment: A focus for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(3), 171–79.
54.
LawMCooperBStrongSStewartDRigbyPLettsL (1996) The Person-Environment Occupation Model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(1), 9–23.
55.
LawMBaptisteSCarswellAMcCollMAPolatajkoHPollockN (1998) Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 3rd ed.Ottawa: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.
56.
LawsonJ (2001) Disability as a cultural identity. International Studies in Sociology of Education. Oxford: Taylor and Francis.
57.
LefcourtHM (1982) Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research. 2nd ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58.
LlorensLA (1991) Performance tasks and roles through the lifespan. In: ChristiansenCBaumC, eds. Occupational therapy overcoming human performance deficits. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
59.
McAuleyERudolphD (1995) Physical activity, aging and psychological well-being. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 3(1), 67–96.
60.
McCollMAPatersonMDaviesDDoubtLLawM (2000) Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(1), 22–30.
61.
McCollMLawMBaptisteSPollockN (2005) Targeted applications of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(5), 298–301.
62.
Muscular Dystrophy Campaign (2004) Justification for the need and provision of powered tilt in space wheelchairs for children and adults with muscular dystrophy or related conditions. London: Muscular Dystrophy Campaign.
63.
National Health Service Executive and Department of Health (2000) Evaluation of the powered wheelchair and voucher scheme initiatives. Final Report. York: York Health Economics Consortium.
64.
National Health Service Guidelines (1996) HSG (96) 34. Powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs for severely disabled people. Leeds: NHS Executive.
65.
National Health Service Wheelchair Services (2003) Minimum national standards and best practice framework. London: NHS Wheelchair Services.
66.
OliverM (1981) Disablement in society. Unit 2, OU Course, ‘The Handicapped Person in the Community’. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
67.
OliverM (1996) Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
68.
ParkerDMSykesCH (2006) A systematic review of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: A clinical practice perspective. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(4), 150–61.
69.
PedrettiLPasquinelliS (1990) A frame of reference for occupational therapy in physical dysfunction. In: PedrettiLWZoltanB, eds. Occupational therapy: Practice skills for physical dysfunction. St Louis, MO: Mosby.
70.
PolgarSThomasSA (2007) Introduction to research in health sciences. 5th ed.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
71.
ReedKLSandersonSN (1999) Concepts of occupational therapy. 4th ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
72.
ReidDLaliberte-RudmanDHebertD (2002) Impact of wheeled seated mobility devices on adult users' and their caregivers' occupational performance: A critical literature review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(5), 261–80.
73.
RipatJEtcheverryECooperJTateRB (2001) A comparison of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(4), 247–53.
74.
RudestamKENewtonRR (2001) Surviving your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process. 2nd ed.London: Sage.
75.
SamsaGPMatcharDB (2004) How strong is the relationship between functional status and quality of life among persons with stroke?Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 41(3A), 279–82.
76.
SearleMMahonMJIso-AholaSESdroliasHEVan DyckJ (1995) Enhancing a sense of independence and psychological well-being among the elderly: A field experiment. Journal of Leisure Research, 27(2), 107–24.
77.
ShakespeareT (1996) Disability, identity and difference: Exploring the divide. Illness and disability. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/ Accessed on 22.02.09.
78.
SmithJA (2004) Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 39–54.
79.
SmithJAOsbornM (2008) Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: SmithJA, ed. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. London: Sage, 53–80.
80.
StammTAAlarcosCMacholdKSmolenJSStuckiG (2006) Exploration of the link between conceptual occupational therapy models and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 53(1), 9–17.
81.
SteultjensEMJ (2005) Evidence of the efficacy of occupational therapy in different conditions: An overview of systematic reviews. Clinical Rehabilitation, 19(3), 247–54.
82.
StewartALTenoJPatrickDLLynnJ (1999) The concept of quality of life of dying persons in the context of healthcare. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 17(2), 93–108.
83.
SumsionT (2002) Client-centred practice in occupational therapy: A guide to implementation. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
84.
TownsendEStantonSLawMPolatajkoHBaptisteSThompson-FransonTKramerCSwedloveFBrintnellSCampanileL (1997) Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications.
85.
TownsendEStantonSLawMPolatajkoHBaptisteSThompson-FransonTKramerCSwedloveFBrintnellSCampanileL (2002) Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications.
86.
VerkerkGJWolfMJLouwersAMMeester-DelverANolletF (2006) The reproducibility and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in parents of children with disabilities. Clinical Rehabilitation, 20(11), 980–88.
87.
WhiteELemmerB (1998) Effectiveness in wheelchair service provision. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(7), 301–05.
88.
WhitefordGFosseyE (2002) Occupation: The essential nexus between philosophy, theory and practice. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 49(1), 1–2.
89.
WressleESamuelssonK (2004) User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 11(3), 143–50.