Abstract

References
1.
Abbott
A.
(2001 ) Chaos of Disciplines , Chicago, Ill : University of Chicago Press .
2.
Burawoy
M.
(2005 ‘For Public Sociology’ , American Sociological Review 70 : 2 –28 .
3.
Edgerton
D.
(2009 ) ‘The Haldane principle and other invented traditions in science policy’ History and Policy Papers . http://www.historyandpolicy.org/papers/policy-paper-88.html (Accessed 20 April 2011)
4.ESRC (2006 ) ‘Demographic Review of the Social Sciences’ http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Images/Demographic_Review_tcm6–13872.pdf (Accessed 20 April 2006)
5.ESRC . (2010 ) ‘Delivery Plan 2011–15’ http://www.esrc.ac.uk/images/ESRC%20Delivery%20Plan%202011-15tcm8-13455.pdf (Accessed 20 April 2011)
6.ESRC . (no date) ‘Pathways to Impact’ http://www.esrc.ac.uk/funding-and-guidance/tools-and-resources/impact-toolkit/what-how-and-why/pathways/index.aspx (Accessed 20 April 2011)
7.HEFCE . (no date) ‘The Research Excellence Framework’ http://www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/ (Accessed 20 April 2011)
8.
Holmwood
J.
(2010 ) ‘Sociology's misfortune: Disciplines, interdisciplinarity and the impact of audit culture’ British Journal of Sociology 61 : 639 –58 .
9.
Holmwood
J.
(2011 ) ‘TRACked and FECked: How audits undermine the arts, humanities and social sciences’ Exquisite Life: Research Blogs
11.
Salter
A.J.
Martin
B.R.
(2001 ) ‘The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review’ Research Policy 30 : 509 –32 .
12.
Novotny
H.
Scott
P.
Gibbons
M.
(2001 ) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , Cambridge : Polity .
13.RCUK (no date). ‘Pathways to Impact’ http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/kei/impacts/Pages/home.aspx (Accessed 20 April 2011)
