The Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) programs serve as popular choices for many intellectually gifted high school students. This article describes an aspect of a larger study that examined 5 intellectually gifted females’ perceptions of their educational experience while enrolled in one of the programs. Using the phenomenological method of qualitative research, this study reports that the participants identified various challenges within the curriculum as part of the overall AP and IB experience. In addition, the participants believe that the teachers in these programs heavily influenced their perception of their experience in the program.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoydD. (1981). Interdisciplinary curriculum design for secondary gifted students. In ArnoldA. (Ed.), Secondary programs for the gifted/talented (pp. 23–27). Ventura, CA: Printcraft.
2.
CampbellK. T.EvansC. (1996). Gender issues and the math/science curricula: Effects on females. People & Education, 2, 284–296.
3.
ColangeloN. (1991). Counseling gifted students: Issues and practices. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 353–365). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
ColemanL. J.CrossT. L. (2001). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
7.
CroftL. J. (2003). Teachers of the gifted: Gifted teachers. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 558–571). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
CurryW.MacDonaldW.MorganR. (1999). The advanced placement program: Access to excellence. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 17–22.
9.
EisnerE. W. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
FeldhusenJ. F. (1991). Educating teachers for work with talented youth. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 547–552). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
FisherJ. L. (1981). The administration of high school programs for the gifted. In ArnoldA. (Ed.), Secondary programs for the gifted/talented (pp. 16–21). Ventura, CA: Printcraft.
12.
FurnhamA.ReevesE.BudhaniS. (2002). Parents think their sons are brighter than their daughters: Sex differences in parental self-examinations and estimations of their children's multiple intelligences. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163, 24–39.
13.
Gazda-GraceP. (2002). Psst … have you heard about the International Baccalaureate program?The Clearing House, 76, 84–87.
14.
HalpernD. F. (2002) Sex differences in achievement scores: Can we design assessments that are fair, meaningful, and valid for girls and boys?Issues in Education, 1, 2–21.
KerrB. A. (1994). Smart girls: A new psychology of girls, women, & giftedness. Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.
17.
KerrB. A. (1996). The career development of gifted girls and women. In EllisJ. L.WillinskyJ. M. (Eds.), Girls, women, and giftedness (pp. 105–122). Unionville, NY: Royal Fireworks Press.
18.
KleinA. G.ZehmsD. (1996). Self-concept and gifted girls: A cross sectional study of intellectually gifted females in grades 3, 5, 8. Roeper Review, 19, 30–35.
19.
LindseyM. (1980). Training teachers of the gifted and talented. New York: Teacher's College Press.
20.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
21.
MoonS. M. (2002). Counseling needs and strategies. In NeihartM.ReisS. M.RobinsonN. M.MoonS. M. (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (pp. 213–222). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
22.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
NelsonM. A.SmithS. W. (2001). External factors affecting gifted girls' academic and career achievements. Intervention in School & Clinic, 37, 19–23.
25.
OrensteinP. (1994). Schoolgirls: Young women, self-esteem, and the confidence gap. New York: Random House.
26.
PipherM. (1994). Reviving Ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York: Ballantine Books.
27.
ReadC. R. (1991). Gender distribution in programs for the gifted. Roeper Review, 13, 188–193.
28.
ReisS. M. (1998). Work left undone: Choices and compromises of talented females. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
29.
ReisS. M.CallahanC. M. (1996) My boyfriend, my girlfriend, or me: The dilemma of talented teenage girls. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 434–447.
30.
RhodesC. (1996). Promoting growth in gifted females: A naturalistic case study. (UMI No. 9701415)
31.
RizzaM. G.ReisS. M. (1991). Comparing and contrasting: Stories of competition. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 54–62.
32.
RogersK. B. (2001). Re-forming gifted education. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
33.
RudestamK. E.NewtonR. R. (2001). Surviving your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
34.
SchwartzL. L. (1994). Why give gifts to the gifted?Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
35.
SeidmanI. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
ShoffnerM. F.NewsomeD. W. (2001). Identity development of gifted female adolescents: The influence of career development, age, and life-role salience. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 201–212.
37.
SilvermanL. K. (1986). What happens to the gifted girl? In MakerC. J. (Ed.), Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for the gifted (pp. 43–89). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
38.
TookeyM. E. (2000). The International Baccalaureate: A program conducive to the continued growth of the gifted adolescent. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 52–67.
39.
TuttleF. B.BeckerL. A. (1980). Program design and development for gifted and talented students. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
40.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (2001). The role of advanced placement in talent development. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 126–132.
41.
VassarW. G. (1980). Staffing in relation to the type of personnel needed. In JordanJ. B.GrossiJ. A. (Eds.), An administrator's handbook on designing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 138–147). Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse.
42.
WoolcockC. W. (1962). The Hunter College High School program for gifted students. New York: Vantage Press.
43.
WrightS. P.HornS. P.SandersW. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57–67.
