The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of the grades 6–8 version of DISCOVER, a performance-based assessment, and investigate its effectiveness in identifying gifted minority students. Questions examined the alignment between DISCOVER and Gardner's (1983) theory of multiple intelligences (MI) and assessed gender and ethnic differences. The sample consisted of 395 middle school students, predominantly Mexican Americans and Native Americans belonging to lower socioeconomic classes, from schools in Arizona. Results supported a good fit between DISCOVER and MI theory. That is, students identified as gifted in one intelligence were not necessarily identified in other intelligences. The 2 × 3 MANOVA (gender by ethnicity) showed no significant interaction or main effect for ethnicity. However, a main effect for gender was found with males outperforming females in math. No overall gender or ethnic differences in identification were revealed. In total, 12.4% of the participants were identified, suggesting that using DISCOVER might diminish the long-standing problem of minority underrepresentation in gifted programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerE. L. (1996). Introduction to theme issue in educational assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 194–196.
2.
BernalE. M. (2002). Three ways to achieve a more equitable representation of culturally and linguistically different students in GT programs. Roeper Review, 24, 82–88.
ClasenD. R.MiddletonJ. AConnellT. J. (1994). Assessing artistic and problem-solving performance in minority and nonminority students using a nontraditional multidimensional approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 27–37.
5.
ColemanM. R. (2001). Middle schools: New trends and issues. Gifted Child Today, 24(4), 20–22.
6.
CummingsJ. (1991). Institutionalized racism and the assessment of minority children: A comparison of policies and programs in the United States and Canada. In SamudaR. J.KongS. L.CumminsJ.Pascual-LeoneJ.LewisJ. (Eds.), Assessment and placement of minority students (pp. 97–107). Toronto: Intercultural Social Sciences Publications.
7.
DunbarS. B.KoretzD. M.HooverH. D. (1991). Quality control in the development and use of performance assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 289–303.
8.
EcclesJ. S. (1993, March). Psychological and social barriers to women's participation in mathematics and science. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
9.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA.MidgleyC.ReumanD.MacIverD.FeldlauferH. (1992). Negative effects of traditional middle schools on students' motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 553–574.
10.
FordD. Y.HarmonD. A. (2001). Equity and excellence: Providing access to gifted education for culturally diverse students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 141–148.
11.
FordD. Y.HarrisJ.TysonC. A.TrotmanF. M. (2002). Beyond deficit thinking: Providing access for gifted African American students. Roeper Review, 24, 52–58.
12.
FrechtlingJ. A. (1991). Performance assessment: Moonstruck or the real thing?Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 10(4), 23–25.
13.
GabelkoN. H.SosniakL. A. (2002). “Someone just like me”: When academic engagement trumps race, class, and gender. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 400–407.
14.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: BasicBooks.
15.
GriffithsS. E. (1996). The inter-observer reliability of the DISCOVER problem-solving assessment. Unpublished manuscript, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
16.
HafensteinN. L.TuckerB. (1994). Performance-based assessment: An alternative assessment process for young gifted children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans. (ERIC Document Reproduction Serves No. 370 994)
17.
HargreavesA.EarlL.SchmidtM. (2002). Perspectives on alternative assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 69–95.
18.
LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implications for the math-science pipeline. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61–66.
19.
LynchM. E. (1991). Gender intensification. In LernerR. M.PattersonA. C.Brooks-GunnJ. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (Vol. 1, pp. 395–397). New York: Garland.
20.
MakerC. J. (1992). Intelligence and creativity in multiple intelligences: Identification and development. Educating Able Learners, 17(4), 12–19.
21.
MakerC. J. (1993). Creativity, intelligence, and problem solving: A definition and design for cross-cultural research and measurement related to giftedness. Gifted Education International, 9, 68–77.
22.
MakerC. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: A national problem, needed changes, and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 41–50.
23.
MakerC. J.NielsonA. B.RogersJ. A. (1994). Giftedness, diversity, and problem-solving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27(1), 4–19.
24.
PluckerJ. A.CallahanC. M.TomchinE. M. (1996). Wherefore art thou, multiple intelligences? Alternative assessments for identifying talent in ethnically diverse and low-income students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 81–90.
25.
ReidC.UdallA.RomanoffB.AlgozzineB. (1999). Comparison of traditional and problem solving assessment criteria. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 252–264.
26.
SarouphimK. M. (1999). DISCOVER: A promising alternative assessment for the identification of gifted minorities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 244–251.
27.
SarouphimK. M. (2000). Internal structure of DISCOVER: A performance-based assessment. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 314–327.
28.
SarouphimK. M. (2001). DISCOVER: Concurrent validity, gender differences, and identification of minority students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 130–138.
29.
SarouphimK. M. (2002). DISCOVER in high school: Identifying gifted Hispanic and Native American students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 30–38.
30.
SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
