Fourteen gifted late adolescents, considered at risk for poor educational outcomes because of underachievement, depression, or family situation, participated in a 4-year qualitative longitudinal study focusing on 4 developmental tasks: gaining autonomy, becoming differentiated, establishing career direction, and developing a mature relationship. The process of resolving conflict with parents generated the largest portion of narrative data. The majority of participants still lacked direction and a mature relationship at the end of the study, but most respondents had resolved conflict, felt autonomous, and reported good emotional health. Multiple task accomplishments were associated with being able to concentrate on academics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaumeisterR. F.ShapiroJ. P.TiceD. M. (1985). Two kinds of identity crisis. Journal of Personality, 53, 407–424.
2.
BlasiA.GlodisK. (1995). The development of identity. A critical analysis from the perspective of the self as subject. Developmental Review, 15, 404–433.
3.
BlosP. (1979). The adolescent passage. New York: International Universities Press.
4.
BlusteinD. L.WalbridgeM. M.FriedlanderM. L. (1991). Contributions of psychological separation and parental attachment to the career development process. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 39–50.
5.
BowenM. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Aronson.
6.
ChickeringA. W. (1969). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
ColangeloN.KerrB.ChristensenP.MaxeyJ. E. (1993). A comparison of gifted underachievers and gifted high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 155–160.
8.
CollinsW. A. (1996). Relationships and development during adolescence: Interpersonal adaptation to developmental change. Personal Relationships, 3, 337–351.
9.
CollinsW. A.LaursenB.MortensenN.LuebkerC.FerreiraM. (1997). Conflict processes and transitions in parent and peer relationships: Implications for autonomy and regulation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12, 178–198.
10.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CrottyM. (1998). Foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Crow's Nest, New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
DellasM.JerniganL. P. (1990). Affective personality characteristics associated with undergraduate ego identity formation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 5, 306–324.
14.
DykP. H.AdamsG. R. (1990). Identity and intimacy: An initial investigation of three theoretical models using cross-lag panel correlations. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 19, 91–110.
15.
EigenC. A.HartmanB. W.HartmanP. T. (1987). Relations between family interaction patterns and career indecision. Psychological Reports, 60, 87–94.
16.
EisnerE. W.PeshkinA. (1990). Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate. New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
EmerickL. J. (1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students' perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 140–146.
18.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
19.
FarmerH. S. (1985). Model of career and achievement motivation for women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 363–390.
20.
FriedmanE. H. (1991). Bowen theory and therapy. In GurmanA. S.KniskernD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (Vol. 2,). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
21.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
22.
GonzalesJ.HayesA. (1988). Psychosocial aspects of the development of gifted underachievers: Review and implications. Exceptional Child, 35, 39–51.
23.
GottesfeldJ.MirskyJ. (1991). To stay or to return: Rapproachement processes in the migration of adolescents and young adults. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 21, 273–284.
24.
HallA.JugovicH.LeeW. (2000, May). Family process antecedents of social cognitive variables related to academic achievement. Paper presented at the Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development, Iowa City, IA.
25.
HavighurstR. J. (1972). Developmental tasks and education (3rd ed.). New York: McKay.
26.
HoffmanL. (1975). “Enmeshment” and the too richly cross-jointed system. Family Process, 14, 457–468.
27.
HollandJ. L.HollandJ. E. (1977). Vocational indecision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 24, 404–414.
28.
HolmbeckG. N.WandreiM. L. (1993). Individual and relational predictors of adjustment in first-year college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 73–78.
29.
KerrB. (1991). A handbook for counseling the gifted and talented. Alexandria, VA: American Association for Counseling and Development.
30.
KidwellJ. S.DunhamR. M.BachoR. A.PastorinoE.PortesP. P. (1995). Adolescent identity exploration: A test of Erikson's theory of transitional crisis. Adolescence, 30, 785–837.
31.
LevinsonD. (1986). A conception of adult development. American Psychologist, 41, 3–13.
32.
LevinsonD. (1996). The seasons of a woman's life. New York: Knopf.
33.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
LoveckyD. (1992). Exploring social and emotional aspects of giftedness in children. Roeper Review, 15, 18–25.
35.
MarciaJ. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In AdelsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159–187). New York: Wiley.
36.
MerriamS. B.ClarkM. C. (1993). Work and love: Their relationship in adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 16, 609–627.
37.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
OlsonD. H. (1990). Clinical Rating Scale (CRS) for the Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems. St. Paul: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.
39.
OlsonD. H.PorterJ.LaveeY. (1982). FACES III: Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales. St. Paul: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.
40.
PetersonJ. S. (2000). One group of achievers and underachievers four years after high school. Roeper Review, 22, 217–224.
41.
PetersonJ. S. (2001). Gifted and at risk: Four longitudinal case studies of post-high-school development. Roeper Review, 24, 31–39.
42.
PetersonJ. S. (2002). Gifted and traumatized: Intelligence as a factor of resilience. Manuscript submitted for publication.
43.
PetersonJ. S.ColangeloN. (1996). Gifted achievers and underachievers: A comparison of patterns found in school files. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 399–407.
44.
PolkinghorneD. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In ValleR. S.HallingS. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 41–60). New York: Plenum.
45.
RakowS. (1989). Gifted … and puberty too. Middle School Journal, 20(4), 18–19.
46.
RiceK. G. (1992). Separation-individuation and adjustment to college: A longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 203–213.
47.
RysiewK. J.ShoreB. M.LeebR. T. (1999). Multipotentiality, giftedness, and career choice. Journal of Counseling & Development, 77, 423–430.
48.
SepichR. T. (1987). A review of the correlates and measurements of career indecision. Journal of Career Development, 14, 8–22.
49.
SlugowskiB. R.MarciaJ. E.KoopmanR. F. (1984). Cognitive and social interactional characteristics of ego-identity statuses in college males. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 646–661.
50.
SteinbergL. (1988). Reciprocal relationship between parent-child distance and pubertal maturation. Developmental Psychology, 24, 122–128.
TuckerB.HafensteinN. L. (1997). Psychological intensities in young gifted learners. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 66–75.
53.
ValineW. J. (1976). A four-year follow-up study of underachieving college freshmen. Journal of College Student Personnel, 309–312.
54.
WalshF.OlsonD. H. (1989). Utility of the circumplex model with severely dysfunctional family systems. Journal of Psychotherapy and the Family, 4, 51–78.
55.
WoodJ.ChapinK.HannahM. E. (1988). Family environment and its relationship to underachievement. Adolescence, 23, 283–290.
56.
ZingaroJ. C. (1983). A family systems approach for the career counselor. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 62, 24–27.
