The authors explore how academically gifted students might pursue social and emotional development and the search for meaning through experiential learning, including service-learning and cooperative education work experiences. Antioch College's 75 years of experience alternating study semesters with full-time work semesters offer one model. Themes that emerged from interviews with six academically gifted students at Antioch included: recognition of their responsibility for learning and the joy they drew from it, the unique challenges made possible through cooperative education, the chance to learn more from peers who are also having such challenging learning experiences, and the opportunity to be part of a “community of hope.“
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antioch College. (1998a). College catalog. Yellow Springs, OH: Author
2.
Antioch College. (1998b). Co-op re-envisioning committee final report. Yellow Springs, OH: Author.
3.
BloomB. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.
4.
BuechnerF. (1973). Wishful thinking: A theological ABC. New York: Harper & Row.
5.
CarrellS. E.RoweP. M. (1993). Effects of cooperative education on student adaptation to university. Journal of Cooperative Education, 29, 33–40.
6.
ClarkB. (1970). The distinctive college: Antioch, Reed, and Swathmore. Chicago: Aldine.
7.
ClarkJ.DixonD. (1997). The impact of social skills training on self-concept of gifted high school students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 8, 179–88.
8.
ClausJ.OgdenC. (1999). Service learning for youth empowerment and social change. New York: Peter Lang.
9.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Books.
10.
DalozL.KeenC.KeenJ.ParksS. (1996). Common fire: Leading lives of commitment in a complex world. New York: Beacon Press.
11.
EylerJ. (1995). Graduates' assessment of the impact of a full-time college internship on their personal and professional lives. College Student Journal, 29, 186–194.
12.
FeldmanD. H. (1986). Nature's gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York: BasicBooks.
13.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
14.
GardnerP. D. (1992). Starting salary outcomes of cooperative education graduates. Journal of Cooperative Education, 27, 16–26.
15.
GoreG. (1972). New evidence of co-op system relevancy. Journal of Cooperative Education, 8, 7–14.
HackettE. J.CroissantJ.SchneiderB. (1992). Industry, academe, and the values of undergraduate engineers. Research in Higher Education, 33, 275–295.
18.
HeinemannH. N.DeFalcoA. A. (1990). Dewey's pragmatism: A philosophical foundation for cooperative education. Journal of Cooperative Education, 27, 38–44.
19.
HowardA.England-KennedyE. (2001). Transgressing boundaries through learning communities. Journal of Cooperative Education, 36, 76–82.
20.
Institute on Education and Training, RAND, & Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles. (1996). Evaluation of learn and serve America. Higher education: First year report, Vol. 1. Retrieved January 26, 2002, from http://www.aypf.org/compendium/C1S34.pdf
21.
JarrellD. (1974). Co-ops and nonco-ops at NASA. Journal of Cooperative Education, 10, 51–54.
22.
John Templeton Foundation. (1999). The Templeton guide: Colleges that encourage character development. Radnor, PA: Author.
23.
KaufmannF. A. (1992). What educators can learn from gifted adults. In MönksF.PetersW. (Eds.), Talent for the future (pp. 109–121). The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
24.
KaufmannF. A. (1999). The courage to succeed: Another look at underachievement. In ClineS.HegemanK. (Eds.), Gifted education in the twenty-first century (pp. 175–189). New York: Winslow Press.
25.
KeganB. (1982). The evolving self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
KuliekeM. (1999, November) Externship experiences for the talented and gifted high school student. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Gifted Children, Albuquerque, NM.
27.
LewisB. (1996). Serving others hooks gifted students on learning. Educational Leadership, 53(5), 70–76.
28.
Limburg-WeberL. (1999). Send them packing: Study abroad as an option for gifted students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 43–51.
29.
LinnP. (1999a). Stepping into the waterfall: Coop learning for a lifetime. 37th annual faculty lecture, Antioch College, Yellow Springs, OH.
30.
LinnP.L. (1999b, Summer). Learning that lasts a lifetime. Liberal Education, 3, 26–35.
31.
McMakinJ. (1993). Working from the heart. San Francisco: HarperCollins.
32.
MilgramR.HongE.ShavitY.PeledR. (1997). Out-of-school activities in gifted adolescents as a predictor of vocational choice and work accomplishment in young adults. Journal of Gifted Secondary Education, 8, 111–120.
33.
MuellerS. L. (1992). The effect of a cooperative education work experience on autonomy, sense of purpose, and mature interpersonal relationships. Journal of Cooperative Education, 27, 27–35.
34.
National Commission for Cooperative Education. (1994). The advantages of cooperative education [Brochure]Boston: Author.
35.
National survey of student engagement, The college student report. The NSSE 2000 report: National benchmarks of effective educational practice. (2000). Bloomington: Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Indiana University.
36.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (1995). A summary of research regarding early entrance to college. Roeper Review, 18, 121–126.
37.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (1998). Development of talents of academically gifted high school students: Issues for secondary school administrators. NASSP Bulletin, 82(595), 85–92.
38.
PalmerP. J. (1998). The courage to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
PiechowskiM. M. (1997). Emotional giftedness: The measure of intrapersonal intelligence. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 366–381). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
40.
PopeL. (1996). Colleges that change lives. New York: Viking/Penguin.
41.
PuzonB. (1999). Experiential education: Learning outside the box. Liberal Education, 85, 3–4.
42.
ReisbergL. (2000, November 17). Are students actually learning?Chronicle of Higher Education, 67–70.
43.
SeidenbergJ. M. (1990). A “come-from-behind” victory for cooperative education. Journal of Cooperative Education, 27, 21–37.
44.
SosniakL. (1999). An everyday curriculum for the development of talent. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 166–172.
45.
SternbergR. J. (1996). Successful intelligence. New York: Simon & Schuster.
46.
TorranceE. P. (1995). Why fly? A philosophy of creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
47.
Van Tassel-BaskaJ. (1992). Planning effective curriculum for gifted learners. Denver, CO: Love.
48.
WadeR.PutnamK. (1995). Tomorrow's leaders? Gifted students' opinions of leadership and service activities. Roeper Review, 18, 150–151.
49.
WagnerR. K.SternbergF. J. (1985). Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 436–358.
50.
WatermanA. (1997). An overview of service-learning and the role of research and evaluation in service-learning programs. In WatermanA. (Ed.), Service learning: Applications from research (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
WestonW. (1986). Career identity and its relationship to participation in a cooperative education program. Journal of Cooperative Education, 23, 25–36.
52.
WilsonJ. (1987). What students gain from cooperation education. In RyderK. G.WilsonJ. W. (Eds.), Cooperative education in a new era (pp. 269–284). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
WilsonJ.Lyons (1961). Work-study college programs. New York: Harper.
