This study examined the effects of a service-learning program on the development of civic attitudes and behaviors of 230 high school students who were identified as academically gifted and participated in either a service-learning program or an accelerated academic program during the summer. Students' responses to 3 surveys measuring civic responsibility, civic behavior, and leadership skills showed that enhanced civic responsibility, particularly a greater awareness of civic issues and a stronger connection and commitment to the community, was found among the students who participated in the service-learning program. Significant differences were not found for civic behaviors and leadership skills as a result of participation in the service-learning program. Longer term studies with students and examination of the type of service-learning activities students choose to get involved in are suggested to corroborate the positive outcomes of the service-learning program.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AblardK. E. (1997). Self-perceptions and needs as a function of type of academic ability and gender. Roeper Review,20, 110–115
2.
AltM. N.MedrichE. A. (1994). Student outcomes from participation in community service.Berkeley, CA: MPR Associates
3.
ChanD. W. (2000a). Developing the creative leadership training program for gifted and talented students in Hong Kong. Roeper Review,22, 94–97
4.
ChanD. W. (2000b). University-school collaboration and needs assessment in the training of student leadership and peer support in Hong Kong. Roeper Review,22, 263–266
5.
ChanD. W. (2003). Leadership skills training for Chinese secondary students in Hong Kong: Does training make a difference?The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education,14, 166–174
6.
ChanL. K. S. (1988). The perceived competence of intellectually talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly,32, 310–314
7.
CognettaP. V.SprinthallN. A. (1978). Students as teachers: Role taking as a means of promoting psychological and ethical development during adolescence. In SprinthallN. A.MosherR. L. (Eds.), Value development as the aim of education (pp. 53–68. Schenectady, NY: Character Research Press
8.
ConradD.HedinD. (1982). The impact of experiential education on adolescent development. Child and Youth Services,4(3/4), 57–76
9.
ConradD.HedinD. (1989). High school community service: A review of research and programs.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Center on Effective Secondary Schools
10.
DavisG. A.RimmS. B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
11.
EylerJ.GilesD. (1999). Where's the learning in service learning?San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
12.
FurcoA.MullerP.AmmonM. S. (1998). Civic Responsibility Survey.Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Service-Learning Research and Development Center
13.
GoldsmithS (1996). RE: Right and responsibilities.Washington, DC: American Alliance for Rights and Responsibilities
14.
GonsalvesW. C.GrimmJ.WelshJ. M. (1981). Leadership training: A lesson in living. Roeper Review,3 (3), 16–19
15.
GrossM. U. M. (1993). Exceptionally gifted children.New York: Routledge
16.
HamiltonS. F.FenzelL. M. (1988). The impact of volunteer experience on adolescent social development: Evidence of program effects. Journal of Adolescent Research,3, 65–80
17.
HansenK (1991, March 18). CBS this morning [Television broadcast].New York: CBS Broadcasting
18.
HaysT. S. (1993). An historical content analysis of publications in gifted education journals. Roeper Review,16, 41–43
19.
HedinD (1989). The power of community service. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science,37, 201–213
20.
HedinD.ConradD. (1991). Service: A pathway to knowledge. Journal of Cooperative Education,27, 73–84
21.
HenselN. H. (1991). Social leadership skills in young children. Roeper Review,14, 4–6
22.
HuckabyW. O.SperlingH. B. (1981). Leadership giftedness: An idea whose time has not yet come. Roeper Review,3 (3), 19–22
23.
HurshB.BorzakL. (1979). Toward cognitive development through field studies. Journal of Higher Education,50, 63–78
24.
JanosP. M.FungH. C.RobinsonN. M. (1985). Self-concepts, self-esteem, and peer relations among gifted children who feel “different.”Gifted Child Quarterly,29, 79–82
25.
KarnesF. A.McGinnisJ. C. (1995). Looking for leadership: Students' perceptions of leaders for the next millennium. Gifted Child Today,18 (1), 30–35
26.
KarnesF. A.MeriweatherS.D'LlioV. (1987). The effectiveness of the leadership studies program. Roeper Review,9, 238–241
27.
KatzE (1995). Self-concept and the gifted student.Boulder, CO: Open Space Communications
28.
LeeS.-Y. & Olszewski- KubiliusP. (2006). The emotional intelligence, moral judgment, and leadership of academically gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,30, 29–67
29.
LeeS.-Y.Olszewski-KubiliusP.DonahueR.WeimholtK. (2006). Developing civic engagement and leadership among gifted youth: Service-learning in gifted education. Manuscript submitted for publication
30.
LewisB (1996). Serving others hooks gifted students on learning. Educational Leadership,53, 70–74
31.
LuchsK. P. (1981). Selected changes in urban high school students after participation in community-based learning and service activities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore
32.
MatthewsM. S. (2004). Leadership education for gifted and talented youth: A review of the literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted,28, 77–113
33.
MintzS.LiuG. (1994). Service learning: An overview.Washington, DC: Corporation for National and Community Service
34.
MyersM. R.SlavinM. J.SouthernW. T. (1990). Emergence and maintenance of leadership among gifted students in group problem solving. Roeper Review,12, 256–261
35.
NewmannF. M.RutterR. A. (1983). The effects of high school community service programs on students' social development: Final report.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research
36.
OaklandT.FalkenbergB. A.OaklandC. (1996). Assessment of leadership in children, youth, and adults. Gifted Child Quarterly,40, 138–146
37.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. M.KuliekeM. J.KrasneyN. (1988). Personality dimensions of gifted adolescents: A review of the empirical literature. Gifted Child Quarterly,32, 347–352
38.
OsborneR. E.HammerichS.HensleyC. (1998, Fall). Student effects of service learning: Tracking change across a semester. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning,5, 5–13
39.
PassowA. H. (1988). Educating gifted persons who are caring and concerned. Roeper Review,11, 13–15
40.
PassowA. H. (1989). Educating gifted persons who are caring and concerned. Gifted Education International,6(1), 5–7
PlowmanP. D. (1981). Training extraordinary leaders. Roeper Review,3(3), 13–16
43.
RenzulliJ. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented.Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
44.
RenzulliJ. S. (1992). A general theory for the development of creative productivity through the pursuit of ideal acts of learning. Gifted Child Quarterly,36, 170–182
45.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
46.
RoetsL. F. (1997). Leadership: Skills training programs for ages 8–18 (8th ed.). Des Moines, IA: Leadership
47.
SilvermanL. K. (1994). The moral sensitivity of gifted children and the evolution of society. Roeper Review,17, 110–116
48.
SiskD. A. (1993). Leadership education for the gifted. In HellerK. A.MönksF. J.PassowA. H. (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 491–505. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press
49.
SmithD. L.SmithL.BarnetteJ. (1991). Exploring the development of leadership giftedness. Roeper Review,14, 7–12
50.
SmythE.RossJ. A. (1999). Developing leadership skills of pre-adolescent gifted learners in small group settings. Gifted Child Quarterly,43, 204–211
51.
SorensonJ.FrancisM. (1988). The gifted program handbook: Planning, implementing, and evaluating gifted programs.Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publications
52.
Tan-WillmanC.GutteridgeD. (1981). Creative thinking and moral reasoning of academically gifted secondary school adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly,25, 149–154
53.
TerryA. W. (2000). An early glimpse: Service learning from an adolescent perspective. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education,11, 115–135
54.
TerryA. W.BohnenbergerJ. E. (2003). Service learning: Fostering a cycle of caring in our gifted youth. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education,15, 23–32
55.
TrebilcoxP. S. (1997). S.O.S.: A gifted class responds. Gifted Child Today,20(5), 42–45
56.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (1993). Theory and research on curriculum development for the gifted. In HellerK. A.MönksF. J.PassowH. (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 365–386. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press
57.
WatermanA. S. (1997). An overview of service learning and the role of research and evaluation in service learning programs. In WatermanA. S. (Ed.), Service learning: Applications from the research (pp. 1–11. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
58.
WillardD. E. (1984). A “social” social studies model for gifted students. Teaching Exceptional Children,17(1), 18–22
59.
ZeldinS.TarlovS. (1997). Service learning as a vehicle for youth development. In SchineJ. (Ed.), Service learning: Ninety-sixth yearbook of the national society for the study of education (pp. 173–185. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
