This descriptive study investigated the possible effects of selected school design patterns on third-grade students' academic achievement. A reduced regression analysis revealed the effects of school design components (patterns) on ITBS achievement data, after including control variables, for a sample of third-grade students drawn from 24 elementary schools. The sample means on the ITBS per school represented approximately 1,916 third-grade students. The independent variable set for developing a possible explanation of student achievement was the school's physical environment, defined as four sets of design patterns: movement and circulation (e.g., adequate personal space and efficient movement patterns throughout the school), large group meeting places (e.g., social gathering places), day lighting and views (e.g., windows with natural light), and instructional neighborhoods (e.g., large and small group areas that accommodate wet and dry activities). Each of the four full regression models, which included subsets of the design elements, explained between 2% and 7% of additional variance in achievement when compared to the reduced model, which included a measure of school SES. Therefore, each of the four design variables was positively related to student achievement, even after controlling for school SES.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderC. (1979). The timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
AlexanderC.IshikawaS.SilversteinM. (1977). A pattern language. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
AndersenS. (1999). The relationship between school design variables and scores on the Iowa Test of Basic Skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
4.
AyersP. D. (1999). Exploring the relationship between high school facilities and achievement of high school students in Georgia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
5.
BanghartF. W.TrullAlbertJr. (1973). Educational planning. New York: Macmillan.
CochranC. D.HaleD.HissamC. (1984). Personal space requirements in indoor versus outdoor locations. Journal of Psychology, 117, 121–123.
8.
ColvenR. (1990). The quality of the physical environment of the school and the quality of education: Conclusions of a seminar. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED324791)
9.
CrumpackerS. S. (1995). Using cultural information to create schools that work. In MeekA. (Ed.), Designing places for learning (pp. 31–42). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
10.
DukeD. L. (1998). Does it matter where out children learn? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED418578)
11.
DuncansonE. (2003). Classroom space: Right for adults but wrong for kids. Educational Facility Planner, 38, 24–28.
12.
EarthmanG. I.LemastersL. K. (1998). Where children learn: A discussion of how a facility affects learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED419368)
13.
EdwardsL.TorcelliniP. (2002). A literature review of the effects of natural light on building occupants (Tech. Rep. No. NREL/TP-550-30769). Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
14.
Georgia Department of Education. (1999). School report cards. Retrieved September 20, 2006, from http://www.doe.k12.ga.us
15.
GrangaardE. M. (1995). Color and light effects on learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED382381)
16.
HallE. (1959). The silent language. New York: Anchor Books.
17.
Heschong Mahone Group. (1999). Day lighting in schools. Fair Oaks, CA: Author.
18.
HughesP. C. (1980). The use of light and color in health. In HastingsA. C.FadimanJ.GordonJ. S. (Eds.), Health for the whole person: The complete guide to holistic medicine (pp. 71–83). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
19.
KullerR.LindstenC. (1992). Health and behavior of children in classrooms with and without windows. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 305–317.
20.
LemastersL. K. (1997). A synthesis of studies pertaining to facilities, student achievement, and student behavior. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED447678)
21.
LomranzJ.ShapiraA.ChoreshN.GilatY. (1975). Children's personal space as a function of age and sex. Developmental Psychology, 11, 541–545.
22.
MooreG. T.LackneyJ. A. (1995). Design patterns for American schools: Responding to the reform movement. In MeekA. (Ed.), Designing places for learning (pp. 11–22). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
23.
MontessoriM. (1967). The absorbent mind. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
24.
NairP.FieldingR. (2005). The language of school design: Design patterns for 21st Century schools. Minneapolis, MN: Design Share.
25.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Condition of America's public school facilities: 1999 (NCES 2000-032). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
26.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Planning guide for maintaining school facilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved November 1, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/maintenance
27.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Public school principals report on their school facilities (NCES 2007-007). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved November 1, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007007
28.
OttJ. (1973). Health and light. New York: Simon and Schuster.
29.
PiagetJ. (1924). Judgment and reasoning in the child. New York: Harcourt Brace.
30.
ProshanskyE.WolfeM. (1974). The physical setting and open education. School Review, 82, 557–574.
SkinnerB. F. (1957). Verbal learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
33.
SommerR. (1969). Personal space. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
SydoriakD. E. (1984). An experiment to determine the effects of light and color in the learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas, Little Rock.
35.
TannerC. K. (1999, November). A school design assessment scale. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Council of Educational Facility Planners, International, Baltimore.
36.
TannerC. K. (2000). The influence of school architecture on academic achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 38, 309–330.
37.
TannerC. K. (2006). Effects of the school's physical environment on student achievement. Educational Planning, 15(2), 25–44.
38.
TannerC. K.LackneyJ. A. (2006). Educational facilities planning: Leadership, architecture, and management. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
39.
WatsonJ. (1928). The ways of behaviorism. New York: Harper and Brothers.
40.
WeinsteinC. S. (1979). The physical environment of the school: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 49, 577–610.
41.
WohlwillJ. F.van VlietW. (1985). Habitats for children: The impacts of density. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42.
WurtmanR. J. (1975). The effects of light on the human body. Scientific American, 233, 68–77.
43.
YarboroughK. A. (2001). The relationship of school design to academic achievement of elementary school children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
