AndersonL. W. (2007). Congress and the classroom: From the Cold War to No Child Left Behind. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Pres.
2.
AndersonR. H. (1961). Arousing and sustaining the interest of gifted children in the study of science. Gifted Child Quarterly, 5, 35–41.
3.
ButzW. P.KellyT. K.AdamsonD. M.BloomG. A.FossumD.GrossM. E. (2004). Will the scientific and technology workforce meet the requirements of the federal government?Pittsburgh, PA: RAND.
4.
DelisleJ. R. (1999). A millennial hourglass: Gifted child education's sands of time. Gifted Child Today, 22(6), 26–32.
ElliottC. (1958). America's backlog of bright boys and girls: Her underdeveloped resource. In ConnantJ. (Ed.) The identification and education of the academically talented student in the American secondary school (pp. 141–148). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
8.
FlanaganJ. C. (1960). The identification, development, and utilization of human talents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 4, 51–54, 58.
9.
FlattauP. E.BrackenJ.Van AttaR.Bandeh-AhmadiA.de la CruzR.SullivanK. (2006). The National Defense Education Act of 1958: Selected outcomes. Washington, DC: Science and Technology Policy Institute.
10.
FlemingA. S. (1960). The philosophy and objectives of the National Defense Education Act. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 327, 132–138.
11.
FriedmanT. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
12.
GetzelJ. W.JacksonP. W. (1958). The meaning of “giftedness”—An examination of an expanding concept. Phi Delta Kappan, 40, 75–77.
13.
GoldbergM. L. (1958). Recent research on the talented. Teachers College Record, 60, 150–163.
14.
HavinghurstR.StiversE.DeHaanR. F. (1955). A survey of the education of gifted children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
LovelessT. (2008). High-achieving students in the era of NCLB. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
16.
MarlandS. P.Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Vol. 1. Report to the Congress of the United States by the U. S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
17.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
18.
National Association for Gifted Children. (2008). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Our nation's renewable resources. Retrieved March 13, 2008, from http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=1484.
19.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2008). Sputnik and the dawn of the space age. Retrieved November 27, 2008, from http://history.nasa.gov/sputnik.
20.
PassowA. H. (1957). Developing a science program for rapid learners. Science Education, 41, 104–112.
21.
SubotnikR. F.EdminstonA. M.RayhackK. M. (2007). Developing national policies in STEM talent and development: Obstacles and opportunities. In CsermelyP.LedermanL.KorcsmárosT. (Eds.), Science education: Models and networking of student research and training under, 21 (pp. 28–38). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
22.
TannenbaumA. J. (1958). History of interest in the gifted. In HenryN. B. (Ed.), The fifty-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 21–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
TermanL. M.OdenM. H. (1959). The gifted group at mid-life: Thirty-five years' follow-up of the superior child. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
TorranceE. P. (1961). Problems of highly creative children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 5, 31–34.