AkinC. A. (2005). Academic asynchrony. Gifted Child Today, 28(2), 60–65.
2.
AkinL. (1998). Information overload and children: A survey of Texas elementary school students. School Library Media Research, 1. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/aasl/SLMQ/overload.html.
3.
American Association of School Librarians, & Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1998). Information literacy standards for student learning. Chicago: American Library Association.
4.
BauleS. (2007). Data, data everywhere, and how do you sort through it?Library Media Connection, 25(6), 54–57.
5.
BilalD. (2001). Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: II. Cognitive and physical behaviors on research tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 118–137.
6.
BilalD.KirbyJ. (2002). Differences and similarities in information seeking: Children and adults as Web users. Information Processing and Management, 38, 649–670.
7.
BlockC. C. (2001). Improving thinking abilities through reading instruction. In CostaA. L. (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (3rd ed., pp. 292–297). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
CoiroJ. (2003). Rethinking comprehension strategies to better prepare students for critically evaluating content on the Internet. The NERA Journal, 39, 29–34. Retrieved from http://ctell1.uconn.edu/coiro/nera2003.pdf.
10.
CoiroJ. (2005). Making sense of online text. Educational Leadership, 63(2), 30–35.
11.
CoiroJ.Schmar-DoblerB. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 214–257.
12.
Columbus Group. (1991, July). Unpublished transcript of the meeting of the Columbus Group. Columbus, OH.
13.
CooperL. Z. (2002). A case study of information-seeking behavior in 7-year-old children in a semistructured situation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 904–922.
14.
CooperM. (2000). Coping with information overload and selecting the best search engine: Fourth-and fifth-grade students discover, develop, and publish strategies. Library Talk, 13(5), 16–17.
15.
HaycockK.DoberM.EdwardsB. (2003). The Neal-Schuman authoritative guide to kids' search engines, subject directories, and portals. New York: Neal-Schuman.
16.
HenryL. A. (2006). SEARCHing for an answer: The critical role of new literacies while reading on the Internet. Reading Teacher, 59, 614–627.
17.
HoctorM. (2005). Accessing information: The Internet—A highway or a maze?Gifted Child Today, 28(3), 32–37.
18.
LoveckyD. V. (1997). Identity development in gifted children: Moral sensitivity. Roeper Review, 20, 90–94.
McCoachD. (2002). Using the Web for social studies enrichment. Gifted Child Today, 25(3), 48–52.
22.
MinkelW. (2004). They can't always find what they want: Kids' online behaviors have researchers scratching their heads. School Library Journal, 50(8), 29.
23.
ParsonsL. (2003). Research and the Internet. School Libraries in Canada, 22(4), 37.
24.
SchacterJ.ChungG. K.DorrA. (1998). Children's Internet searching on complex problems: Performance and process analyses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 840–849.
ScottT.O'SullivanM. (2005). Analyzing student search strategies: Making a case for integrating information literacy skills into the curriculum. Teacher Librarian, 33(1), 21–25.
27.
SiegleD. (2004). The merging of literacy and technology in the 21st century: A bonus for gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 27(2), 32–34.
28.
SiegleD. (2005). Six uses of the Internet to develop students' gifts and talents. Gifted Child Today, 28(2), 30–36.
29.
TrotterA. (2004). Web searches often overwhelm young researchers. Education Week, 24(14), 8.