BelcastroF. (2005). Applications of electronic technology to rural gifted students who are blind or visually impaired. Information Technology and Disabilities E-Journal. Retrieved August 11, 2006, from http://www.rit.edu/~easi/itd/itdv11n1/belcast.htm.
2.
BergenD. (2002). Differentiating curriculum with technology-enhanced class projects. Childhood Education, 78, 117–118.
KalchmanM.CaseR. (1999). Diversifying the curriculum in a mathematics classroom streamed for high-ability learners: A necessity unmassaged. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 320–330.
5.
McKinnonD.NolanC. (1999). Distance education for the gifted and talented: An interactive design model. Roeper Review, 21, 320–325.
6.
RappW. (2005). Inquiry-based environments for the inclusion of students with exceptional learning needs. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 297–310.
7.
ReisS. M.BurnsD. E.RenzulliJ. S. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high ability students.Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
8.
RejskindG. (2000). TAG teachers: Only the creative need apply. Roeper Review, 22, 153–157.
9.
RileyT. (2003). Take a summer vacation cruising the Internet. Gifted Child Today, 26(3), 8.
10.
SandholtzJ. H. (2001). Learning to teach with technology: A comparison of teacher development programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 349–374.
11.
TroxclairD. (2000). Differentiating instruction for gifted students in regular education social studies classes. Roeper Review, 22, 195–198.