The Benefits of Equalizing Standards and Creativity: Discovering a Balance in Instruction

Baum S. (1990). Gifted but learning disabled: A puzzling paradox (ERIC EC Digest #E479). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://ericec.org/digests/e470.html.

Betts G. (2004). Fostering autonomous learners through levels of differentiation. Roeper Review, 26, 190–191.

Diamond J. B. Spillane J. P. (2004). High-stakes accountability in urban elementary schools: Challenge or reproducing inequality? Teacher College Record, 106, 1145–1176.

Erez R. (2004). Freedom and creativity: An approach to science education for excellent students and its realization in the Israel arts and science academy's curriculum. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15, 133–140.

Feng A. X. VanTassel-Baska J. Quek C. Bai W. O'Neill B. (2005). A longitudinal assessment of gifted students' learning using the integrated curriculum model (ICM): Impacts and perceptions of the William and Mary language arts and science curriculum. Roeper Review, 27, 78–83.

Folsom C. (2006). Making conceptual connections between gifted and general education: Teaching for intellectual and emotional learning (TIEL). Roeper Review, 28, 79–87.

Harlen W. Crick R. D. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education, 10, 169–207.

Kay S. (1998). Curriculum and the creative process: Contributions in memory of A. Harry Passow. Roeper Review, 21, 5–13.

Loveless A. (2003). Creating spaces in the primary curriculum: ICT in creative subjects. The Curriculum Journal, 14, 5–21.

Mahboub K. C. Portillo M. B. Liu Y. Chandraratna S. (2004). Measuring and enhancing creativity. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29, 429–436.

Mann R. L. (2005). Gifted students with spatial strengths and sequential weaknesses: An overlooked and underidentified population. Roeper Review, 27, 91–96.

Moon T. R. Brighton C. M. Callahan C. M. (2002). State standardized testing programs: Friend or foe of gifted education? Roeper Review, 25, 49–60.

Mulhern J. D. (2003). The gifted child in the regular classroom. Roeper Review, 25, 112–116.

Murdock M. C. (2003). The effects of teaching programmes intended to stimulate creativity: A disciplinary view. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 339–357.

Plucker J. A. Beghetto R. A. Dow G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.

Riley N. R. Ahlberg M. (2004). Investigating the use of ICT-based concept mapping techniques on creativity in literacy tasks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 244–256.

Ritchhart R. (2004). Creative teaching in the shadows of the standards. Independent School, 63(2), 32–41.

Sandholtz J. H. Ogawa R. T. Scribner S. P. (2004). Standards gaps: Unintended consequences of local standards-based reform. Teachers College Record, 106, 1177–1202.

Sternberg R. J. (2003). Creative thinking in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 325–338.

Sternberg R. J. (2005). WICS: A model of giftedness in leadership. Roeper Review, 28, 37–44.

Ugur S. (2004). About creativity, giftedness, and teaching the creatively gifted in the classroom. Roeper Review, 26, 216–222.

Winebrenner S. Berger S. (1994). Providing curriculum alternatives to motivate gifted students. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children. Retrieved October 7, 2005, from http://ericec.org/digests/e524.html.