BloomB. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain.New York: Longmans Green.
2.
BurneyG. (2002). Advanced placement Indiana: Why you should support it. In Indiana Association for the Gifted (Eds.), A gifted education resource guide for Indiana parents and educators (pp. 137–140). Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Department of Education, Division of Exceptional Learners.
3.
CallahanC.HertbergH.KyburgR. (2005, April). AP and IB courses: A fit for gifted learners? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
4.
ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (Vol. 1). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
5.
College Board. (2002). Bulletin 20022003 for AP students and parents.New York: Author.
6.
DixonF. A. (in press). Creating a community of thinkers through challenging curriculum: Language arts units for high-ability learners in third grade.Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
7.
FeldhusenJ. F. (1997). Secondary services, opportunities, and activities for talented youth. In ColangeloN.DavisG. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 189–197). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
FeldhusenJ. F.RobinsonA. (1986). The Purdue secondary model for gifted and talented youth. In RenzulliJ. (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 153–179). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
9.
GallagherJ. J. (1975). Teaching the gifted child.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
GallagherJ. J. (2004). Public policy and acceleration of gifted students. In ColangeloN.AssoulineS.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (Vol. 2; pp. 39–45). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
11.
PoelzerG. H.FeldhusenJ. F. (1996). An empirical study of the achievement of International Baccalaureate students in biology, chemistry, and physics in Alberta. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 8, 28–40.
12.
RobertsJ. L. (2005). Teachers of secondary gifted students: What makes them effective. In DixonF. A.MoonS. M. (Eds.), Handbook of secondary gifted education (pp. 567–580). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
13.
RogersK. (2005). The academic effects of acceleration. In ColangeloN.AssoulineS.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (Vol. 2; pp. 47–57). Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
14.
RuchC. (1968). A study of the collegiate records of Advanced Placement and non-Advanced Placement students. College and University, 43, 207–210.
15.
SchlichterC. (1997). Talents unlimited model in programs for gifted students. In ColangeloN.DavisG. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 318–327). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
TomlinsonC. A. (1995). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms.Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
17.
TomlinsonC. A. (2003). Forward. In King-ShaverB.HunterA., Differentiated instruction in the English classroom (pp. iv—vii). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
18.
WormeliR. (2001). Meet me in the middle: Becoming an accomplished middle-level teacher.Portland, ME: Stenhouse.