ArnoldK. D. (1993). Undergraduate aspirations and career outcomes of academically talented women: A discriminant analysis. Roeper Review, 15, 169–175.
2.
BaldwinA. Y. (1994). The seven plus story: Developing hidden talent among students in socioeconomically disadvantaged environments. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 80–84.
3.
BernalE. M. (2002). Three ways to achieve a more equitable representation of culturally and linguistically different students in GT programs. Roeper Review, 24, 82–88.
FordD. Y.HarrisJ. J.TysonC. A.IIITrotmanM. F. (2002). Beyond deficit thinking: Providing access for gifted African American students. Roeper Review, 2, 52–58.
9.
FrasierM. M. (1987). The identification of gifted Black students: Developing new perspectives. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 155–180.
10.
GallagherJ. J. (1994). Current and historical thinking on education for gifted and talented students. In RossP. O. (Ed.), National excellence, a case for developing America's talent: An anthology of readings (pp. 2640). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
11.
GranthamT. C. (2003). Increasing Black student enrollment in gifted programs: An exploration of the Pulaski county special school district's advocacy efforts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 46–65.
12.
HiattE. L. (1994). Promises to keep: The story of Project Promise. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 85–88.
13.
MakerC. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: A national problem, needed changes and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 41–50.
14.
MillerL. S. (2004). Promoting sustained growth in the representation of African Americans, Latinos, and Native Americans among top students in the United States at ALL levels of the education system.Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
15.
MorrisJ. E. (2002). African American students and gifted education: The politics of race and culture. Roeper Review, 24, 59–62.
16.
NaglieriJ. A.FordD. Y. (2003). Addressing underrepresentation of gifted minority children using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT). Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 155–160.
17.
SaccuzzoD. P.JohnsonN. E.GuertinT. L. (1994). Identifying underrepresented disadvantaged gifted and talented children: A multifaceted approach.San Diego, CA: San Diego State University.
18.
SarouphimK. M. (1999). DISCOVER: A promising alternative assessment for the identification of gifted minorities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 244–251.
19.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.JohnsonD.AveryL. D. (2002). Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 110–123.