BenbowC. P.StanleyJ. C. (1996). Inequity in equity. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 249–292.
2.
BergerS. L. (1990). Supporting gifted education through advocacy (ERIC Digest #E494). Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 321499).
3.
BislandA. (2003). Student-created public relations for gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 26(2), 60–64.
4.
CopenhaverR. W.McIntyreD. J. (1992). Teachers' perception of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14, 151–153.
5.
CornA. L. (1999). Missed opportunities—But a new century is starting. Gifted Child Today, 22(6), 19–21.
6.
HerzogN. B. (2003). Advocacy: On the cutting edge. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 66–81.
7.
HunsakerS. L. (2000). Documenting gifted programming results for key decision-makers. Roeper Review, 23, 80–82.
8.
KarnesF. A.LewisJ. D.StephensK. R. (1999). Parents and teachers working together for advocacy through public relations. Gifted Child Today, 22(1), 14–18.
9.
KigerL. (1998). Public relations for gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 21(5), 42–44.
10.
LewisJ. D.KarnesF. A. (2001). Public relations and advocacy for the gifted. In KarnesF. A. & BeanS.M. (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp. 635–672). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
11.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1991). Building advocacy through program design, student productivity, and public relations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 182–187.
12.
RobinsonA.MoonS. M. (2003). A national study of local and state advocacy in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 8–25.
13.
SternbergR. (1996). Neither elitism nor egalitarianism: Gifted education as a third force in American education. Roeper Review, 18, 261–263.
14.
TroxclairD.KarnesF. A. (1997). Public relations: Advocating for gifted students: Building relationships with organizations outside gifted education. Gifted Child Today. 20(3), 38–41, 50.