BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
2.
BaumS. (1984). Meeting the needs of learning disabled gifted children. Roeper Review, 7, 16–19.
3.
BaumS. (1990). Gifted but learning disabled: A puzzling paradox (ERIC EC Digest #E479). Eric Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. Retrieved August 11, 2001, from http://ericec.org/digests/e479.html.
FeldhusenJ.KoloffP. (1986). The Purdue three-stage enrichment model for gifted education at the elementary level. In RenzulliJ. (Eds.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 126–152). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
9.
GlennanT.MelmedA. (1996). Fostering the use of educational technology: Elements of a national strategy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
10.
KarnesF.BeanS. (1990). Developing leadership in gifted youth (ERIC EC Digest #E485). Eric Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. Retrieved August 14, 2001, from http://ericec.org/digests/e485.html.
11.
KellaghanT.MadausG.RaczekA. (1996). The use of external examinations to improve student motivation. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
12.
MeansB.OlsonK. (1995). Technology's role in education: Reform, findings from a national study of innovating schools. Menlo Park, CA: SRI.
13.
MorganT. (1993). Technology: An essential tool for gifted & talented education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 358–71.
14.
MultonK.BrownS.LentR. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38.
15.
PajaresF.ValianteG. (1997). Influence of writing self-efficacy beliefs on the writing performance of upper elementary students. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 353–360.
RenzulliJ.ReisS. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
18.
SchlichterC. (1986). Talents unlimited: Applying the multiple talent approach in mainstream and gifted programs. In RenzulliJ. (Eds.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 306–350). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
19.
TannenbaumA. (1986). The enrichment matrix model. In RenzulliJ. (Eds.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 391–428). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
20.
TaylorC. (1988). Various approaches to and definitions of creativity. In SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The nature of creativity (pp. 99–121). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
21.
TorranceE. (1981). Creative teaching makes a difference. In GowanJ. C.KhatenaJ.TorranceE. (Eds.), Creativity: Its educational implications (2nd ed., pp. 165–170). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
22.
TreffingerD.SortoreM. (1992). Programming for gifted series. Volume 1: Programming for giftedness—a contemporary view. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
23.
WillamsF. (1986). The cognitive-affective interaction model for enriching gifted programs. In RenzulliJ. (Eds.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 461–484). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press. Resources Books.
24.
BlackK. (1989). Kid video: Fundamentals of video instruction. Tuscon, AZ: Zephyr Press.
25.
KykerK.CurchyC. (1997). Educator's survival guide to TV production equipment and setup. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
26.
KykerK.CurchyC. (1994). Television production for elementary and middle schools. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
27.
LimpusB. (1994). Lights, camera, action: A guide to using video production and instruction in the classroom. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
28.
WallaceV. (1996). School news shows: Video production with a focus. Worthington, OH: Linworth.