American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: A study of major findings on girls and education. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.
2.
BakerD.LearyR. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 3–27.
3.
BarmanC. R. (1997). Students’ views of scientists and science: Results from a national study. Science and Children, 35(1), 18–23.
4.
DavisG. A.RimmS. B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
5.
GouldJ. C.ThorpeP.WeeksV. (2001). An early childhood accelerated program. Educational Leadership, 59(3), 47–50.
JoyceB. A.FarengaS. J. (2000). Young girls in science: Academic ability, perceptions, and future participation in science. Roeper Review, 22, 261–262.
8.
PiirtoJ. (1999). Talented children and adults (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
9.
RimmS.Rimm-KaufmanS.RimmH. (1999). See Jane win. New York: Crown.
10.
RopC. (1997). Breaking the gender barrier in the physical sciences. Educational Leadership, 55(4), 58–60.
11.
SchweigardtW. J.WorrellF. C.HaleR. J. (2001). Gender differences in the motivation for and selection of courses in a summer program for academically talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 283–292.
12.
SullinsE. S.HernandezD.FullerC.TashiroJ. S. (1995). Predicting who will major in a science discipline: Expectancy-value theory as part of an ecological model for studying academic communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32(1), 99–119.