AmbroseD.AllenJ.HuntleyS. (1994). Mentorship of the highly creative. Roeper Review, 17, 131–134.
2.
BergerS. (1990). Mentor relationships and gifted learners (Report No. EDO-ED-90–5). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 321 491).
3.
ClarkE. (1995). Mentoring: A case example and guidelines for its effective use. Youth Studies, 14(2), 37–42.
4.
ClasenD. R.ClasenR. E. (1997). Mentoring: A time-honored option for education of the gifted and talented. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 218–229). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
5.
DavalosR. A.HaenslyP. A. (1997). After the dust has settled: Youth reflect on their high school mentored research experience. Roeper Review, 19, 204–207.
6.
DonderoG. M. (1997). Mentors: Beacons of hope. Adolescence, 32, 881–886.
7.
GrybekD. D. (1997). Mentoring the gifted and talented. Preventing School Failure, 41(3), 115–118.
8.
RichterM. S. (1998). A mentor program for U.R.O.'s. Teaching PreK-8, 29(1), 72–74.
9.
SchatzE. (1999). Mentors: Matchmaking for young people. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 67–86.
10.
SchwiebertV. L.DeckM. D.BradshawM. L.ScottP.HarperM. (1999). Women as mentors. Journal of Humanistic Counseling Education and Development, 37, 241–252.
11.
TemplinM. A. (1999). A locally based science mentorship program for high achieving students: Unearthing issues that influence affective outcomes. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 205–212.
12.
WrightL.BorlandJ. H. (1992). A special friend: Adolescent mentors for young, economically disadvantaged, potentially gifted students. Roeper Review, 14, 124–129.