AdamsD. C.SalvaterraM. E. (1998). Structural and teacher changes: Necessities for successful block schedulingHigh School Journal, 81, 98–106
2.
BanburyJ. A. (1998). An analysis of changes in teacher instructional practices under block scheduling in seven suburban high schools (Doctoral Dissertation, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 1998)Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(3), 708
3.
BarrowsH. (1994). Practice-based learning.Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
4.
BentonJ. L. (1998). Block scheduling: Perceptions from within (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Nebraska, Lincoln, 1998)Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(3), 777
CanadyR. L.RettigM. D. (1995). Block scheduling: A catalyst for change in high schools.Princeton, NJ: Eye On Education
7.
CarrollJ. M. (1994a). Organizing time to support learningSchool Administrator, 51(3), 26–28, 30–33
8.
CarrollJ. M. (1994b, March). Why more time makes more sense: Author of Copernican plan says “macro scheduling” brings benefits to student learningThe School Administrator [online]. Retreived July 25, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.aasa.org/issues/block/block1.htm
9.
ClandininD. J.ConnellyF. M. (1995). Teachers' professional knowledge landscapes.New York: Teachers College Press
10.
ClasenD. R.ClasenR. E. (1997). Mentoring: A time-honored option for education of the gifted and talented In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds)., Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed; pp. 218–229). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon
11.
DavisG. A.RimmS. B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented(4th ed.).Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon
12.
DelisleJ. R. (1992). Guiding the social and emotional development of gifted youth.New York: Longman
13.
DettmerP.LandrumM. (Eds.). (1998). Staff development.Washington, DC: The National Association for Gifted Children
14.
DoughertyB. (1998). Policy briefing: Block scheduling in secondary schools. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning (PREL) briefing paper.Honolulu, HI: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 415 587)
15.
DuggerC. L. C. (1997). Stages of implementation of block scheduling: Perceptions of school climate in high schools in the first Tennessee regional district (Doctoral Dissertation, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City)Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(3A), 808
16.
EdigerM. (1998). Block of time in teaching the social studiesJournal of Instructional Psychology, 25, 139–144
17.
FeldhusenJ. F. (1997). Educating teachers for work with talented youth In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of Gifted Education (pp. 547–552). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon
18.
FeldhusenJ. J. (1993). Individualized teaching of the gifted in regular classrooms In MakerC. J.Orzechowski-HarlandD. (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education: Vol. III. Programs for the gifted in regular classrooms (pp. 263–273). Austin, TX: PRO-ED
19.
FritzD. L. (1997). Teaching in 90 minutes: Conversations with teachers using block scheduling (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Nebraska, Lincoln, 1997)Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(4), 1190
20.
GalbraithJ.DelisleJ. (1996). The gifted kids' survival guide.Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit
21.
GallagherS. A. (1997). Problem-based learning: Where did it come from, what does it do, and where is it goingJournal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 332–362
22.
HundleyW. W. (1996). A comparative study of the classroom environment of traditional and block scheduled classes (Doctoral Dissertation, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, WA)Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(10A), 3880
23.
JonesJ. (Ed.). (1994). Prisoners of time.Washington, DC: National Commission on Time and Learning
24.
KokorudaR. J. (1997). An evaluation study of a pilot block scheduling program at a suburban high school (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence)Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(10), 3822
MaltbyF. (1993). Teaching mathematics through thinking actively in a social contextGifted Education International, 9(1), 45–47
27.
NashW. R.HaenslyP. A.Scobee-RodgersV. J.WrightN. L. (1993). Mentoring: Extending learning for gifted students In MakerC. J.Orzechowski-HarlandD. (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education: Vol. III. Programs for the gifted in regular classrooms (pp. 313–330). Austin, TX: PRO-ED
28.
NormanG. K.SchmidtH. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidenceAcademic Medicine, 67, 557–565
29.
ParnesS. J. (Ed.). (1992). Source book in creative problem solving: A 50 year digest of proven innovation processes.Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation Press
30.
QueenJ. A.AlgozzineB.EaddyM. (1998). Implementing 4×4 block scheduling: Pitfalls, promises, and provisosHigh School Journal, 81, 107–114
31.
ReisS. M.BurnsD. K.RenzulliJ. S. (1992). Curriculum compacting: A process for modifying curriculum for high ability students.Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented
32.
RenzulliJ. S. (Ed.). (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented.Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
33.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence.Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
34.
SchultzR. A. (1998, August). Visions of the possible: Schools through the eyes of selective learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Supporting the Emotional Needs of the Gifted, San Antonio, TX
35.
SchultzR. A. (1999). Deciphering gifted underachiever performance in the secondary science classroom: Illuminating learner realities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, OH
36.
SchultzR. A.DelisleJ. R. (1997). School, curriculum, and the good life: Knowing the selfRoeper Review, 20, 99–104
37.
ShoreB. M.CornellD. G.RobinsonA.WardV. S. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education.New York: Teachers' College Press
38.
StarkoA. (1986). It's about time.Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
39.
TomlinsonC. A. (1995). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
40.
WarnerM. P. (1997). Forms of support provided to teachers as they began working in a 4×4 block scheduled school (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(6), 2017
41.
WebbJ. T.MeckstrothE. A.TolanS. S. (1982). Guiding the gifted child.Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press
42.
WinebrennerS. (1992). Teaching gifted kids in the regular classroom.Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit
43.
YorkT. (1997). A comparative analysis of student achievement in block and traditionally scheduled high schools (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Houston, Texas)Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(3A), 811