Abstract
Background:
With the increase in the quality and quantity of clinical work and the implementation of the new Law of Labor, the teaching and learning time of clinical teachers and trainees trained in junior respiratory therapists has been severely reduced. Therefore, how to make junior therapist really learn, teachers can to save time and make effective teaching, flipping teaching becomes an efficient teaching method.
Methods:
This study expects to integrate online clinical knowledge learning and face-to-face clinical care through the current clinical hybrid learning and further integrate into the new pedagogy 'flipping classroom' to strengthen the interconnection between the online and face-to-face end, and focus on the face-to-face end Clinical nursing practice "turning learning course" and evaluation of learning effectiveness. Students complete pre-test and post-test of the course and use their scores as a paired sample T test, if the P<0.05 has a difference in learning outcomes.
Results:
According to the new two-year junior therapist three-stage training course, 11 courses, 11 courses and 16 courses were respectively prepared, each of which has 7, 6 and 6 trainees tested. The results before and after the test were (76.21 ± 9.41 vs 95. 38 ± 5.81, respectively). 75.25 ± 12.24 vs 92.00 ± 8.01, 66.25 ± 10.08 vs 94.37 ± 5.77), all P values were < 0.01, which was statistically significant. The satisfaction of the students also reached 100%.
Conclusions:
With the requirements of the Labor Force Law, it is becoming more and more difficult to conduct teaching courses outside of work. Using flipping teaching methods to save classroom teaching seems to be feasible in this study, and the post-test results are significantly better than the pre-test results, and it has statistical significance. The trainees also pay high satisfaction for the training.
Disclosures:
The study was supported by China Medical University Hospital (CMUH-EDU-10521-6). The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.
Comparison of average scores before and after three-phase test
Junior Therapist
Total Number of Courses
Pre-test Score
Post-test Score
P value
Average
SD
Average
SD
First stage
7
11
76.21
9.41
95.38
5.81
<0.01
Second stage
6
11
75.25
12.24
92.00
8.01
<0.01
Third stage
6
11
66.25
10.08
94.37
5.77
<0.01
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
