The development of less expensive, smaller, and more reliable video cameras has revolutionized the design of laryngoscopes and the process of endotracheal intubation. The term video laryngoscopy defines a broad range of devices, distinct from fiberoptic bronchoscopes, in which a video camera is used in place of line-of-sight visualization to accomplish endotracheal intubation. Over a dozen laryngoscopes are marketed currently. Each model of video laryngoscope has its own unique strengths, weaknesses, and best applications. For the purposes of this review, video laryngoscopes are grouped into 3 different designs: stylets, guide channels, and video modifications of the traditional (usually Macintosh) laryngoscope blades.
PetersonGN, DominoKB, CaplanRA, PosnerKL, LeeLA, CheneyFW. Management of the difficult airway: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology, 2005; 103(1):33–39.
2.
Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology, 2003; 98(5):1269–1277.
3.
KaplanMB, WardDS, BerciG. A new video laryngoscope: an aid to intubation and teaching. J Clin Anesth, 2002; 14(8):620–626.
4.
KaplanMB, WardD, HagbergCA, BerciG, HagiikeM. Seeing is believing: the importance of video laryngoscopy in teaching and in managing the difficult airway. Surg Endosc, 2006; 20(Suppl 2):S479–S483.
5.
YouJS, ParkS, ChungSP, ParkYS, ParkJW. The usefulness of the GlideScope video laryngoscope in the education of conventional tracheal intubation for the novice. Emerg Med J, 2009; 26(2):109–111.
6.
SibertK, RicciMA, CaputoM, CallasPW, RogersFB, CharashW, et al. The feasibility of using ultrasound and video laryngoscopy in a mobile telemedicine consult. Telemed J E Health, 2008; 14(3):266–272.
7.
BoedekerBH, BergBW, BernhagenM, MurrayWB. Direct versus indirect laryngoscopic visualization in human endotracheal intubation: a tool for virtual anesthesia practice and teleanesthesiology. Stud Health Technol Inform, 2008; 132:31–36.
8.
LowD, HealyD, RasburnN. The use of the BERCI DCI video laryngoscope for teaching novices direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia, 2008; 63(2):195–201.
9.
Howard-QuijanoKJ, HuangYM, MatevosianR, KaplanMB, SteadmanRH. Video-assisted instruction improves the success rate for tracheal intubation by novices. Br J Anaesth, 2008; 101(4):568–572.
10.
CooperRM. Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth, 2007; 54(1):54–57.
11.
MalikAM, FrogelJK. Anterior tonsillar pillar perforation during GlideScope video laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg, 2007; 104(6):1610–1611, discussion 1611.
12.
CrossP, CytrynJ, ChengKK. Perforation of the soft palate using the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth, 2007; 54(7):588–589.
13.
VincentRDJr, WimberlyMP, BrockwellRC, MagnusonJS. Soft palate perforation during orotracheal intubation facilitated by the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. J Clin Anesth, 2007; 19(8):619–621.
WayneMA, McDonnellM. Comparison of traditional versus video laryngoscopy in out-of-hospital tracheal intubation. Prehosp Emerg Care, 2010; 14(2):278–282.
16.
BjoernsenLP, ParquetteBT, LindsayMB. Prehospital use of video laryngoscope by an air medical crew. Air Med J, 2008; 27(5):242–244.
17.
BergB, WalkerRA, MurrayWB, BoedekerBH. Airway intubation in a helicopter cabin: video vs. direct laryngoscopy in manikins. Aviat Space Environ Med, 2009; 80(9):820–823.
18.
BjoernsenLP, LindsayB. Video laryngoscopy in the prehospital setting. Prehosp Disaster Med, 2009; 24(3):265–270.
19.
BonfilsP. [Difficult intubation in Pierre-Robin children, a new method: the retromolar route]. Anaesthesist, 1983; 32(7):363–367. Article in German.
20.
BeinB, WorthmannF, ScholzJ, BrinkmannF, TonnerPH, SteinfathM, et al. A comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the Bonfils intubation fibrescope in patients with predicted difficult airways. Anaesthesia, 2004; 59(7):668–674.
21.
BeinB, YanM, TonnerPH, ScholzJ, SteinfathM, DorgesV. Tracheal intubation using the Bonfils intubation fibrescope after failed direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia, 2004; 59(12):1207–1209.
22.
TurkstraTP, PelzDM, JonesPM. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison of the AirTraq laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesthesiology, 2009; 111(1):97–101.
23.
HirabayashiY, FujitaA, SeoN, SugimotoH. A comparison of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia, 2008; 63(6):635–640.
24.
HirabayashiY, SeoN. Airway Scope: early clinical experience in 405 patients. J Anesth, 2008; 22(1):81–85.
25.
AsaiT, LiuEH, MatsumotoS, HirabayashiY, SeoN, SuzukiA, et al. Use of the Pentax-AWS in 293 patients with difficult airways. Anesthesiology, 2009; 110(4):898–904.
26.
SuzukiA, ToyamaY, KatsumiN, KunisawaT, SasakiR, HirotaK, et al. The Pentax-AWS rigid indirect video laryngoscope: clinical assessment of performance in 320 cases. Anaesthesia, 2008; 63(6):641–647.
27.
EnomotoY, AsaiT, AraiT, KamishimaK, OkudaY. Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative study. Br J Anaesth, 2008; 100(4):544–548.
28.
MaruyamaK, YamadaT, KawakamiR, HaraK. Randomized cross-over comparison of cervical-spine motion with the AirWay Scope or Macintosh laryngoscope with in-line stabilization: a video-fluoroscopic study. Br J Anaesth, 2008; 101(4):563–567.
29.
AzizM, DillmanD, KirschJR, BrambrinkA. Video laryngoscopy with the macintosh video laryngoscope in simulated prehospital scenarios by paramedic students. Prehosp Emerg Care, 2009; 13(2):251–255.
30.
KaplanMB, HagbergCA, WardDS, BrambrinkA, ChhibberAK, HeideggerT, et al. Comparison of direct and video-assisted views of the larynx during routine intubation. J Clin Anesth, 2006; 18(5):357–362.
31.
JungbauerA, SchumannM, BrunkhorstV, BorgersA, GroebenH. Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth, 2009; 102(4):546–550.
32.
VlattenA, AucoinS, LitzS, MacmanusB, SoderC. A comparison of the STORZ video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy for intubation in the pediatric airway: a randomized clinical trial. Paediatr Anaesth, 2009; 19(11):1102–1107.
33.
MacnairD, BaracloughD, WilsonG, BlochM, EngelhardtT. Pediatric airway management: comparing the Berci-Kaplan video laryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy. Paediatr Anaesth, 2009; 19(6):577–580.
34.
CavusE, KieckhaeferJ, DoergesV, MoellerT, TheeC, WagnerK. The C-MAC videolaryngoscope: first experiences with a new device for videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation. Anesth Analg, 2010; 110(2):473–477.
35.
ShippeyB, RayD, McKeownD. Use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope in the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth, 2008; 100(1):116–119.
36.
ShippeyB, RayD, McKeownD. Case series: the McGrath videolaryngoscope: an initial clinical evaluation. Can J Anaesth, 2007; 54(4):307–313.
37.
O'LearyAM, SandisonMR, MyneniN, CirillaDJ, RobertsKW, DeaneGD. Preliminary evaluation of a novel videolaryngoscope, the McGrath series 5, in the management of difficult and challenging endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth, 2008; 20(4):320–321.
38.
WalkerL, BramptonW, HalaiM, HoyC, LeeE, ScottI, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth, 2009; 103(3):440–445.
39.
CooperRM. Use of a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in the management of a difficult airway. Can J Anaesth, 2003; 50(6):611–613.
40.
CooperRM. The GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Anaesthesia, 2005; 60(10):1042.
41.
CooperRM, PaceyJA, BishopMJ, McCluskeySA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth, 2005; 52(2):191–198.
42.
SunDA, WarrinerCB, ParsonsDG, KleinR, UmedalyHS, MoultM. The GlideScope video laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth, 2005; 94(3):381–384.
43.
StroumpoulisK, PagoulatouA, ViolariM, IkonomouI, KalantziN, KastrinakiK, et al. Videolaryngoscopy in the management of the difficult airway: a comparison with the Macintosh blade. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2009; 26(3):218–222.
44.
KimJT, NaHS, BaeJY, KimDW, KimHS, KimCS, et al. GlideScope video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203 paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth, 2008; 101(4):531–534.
45.
SerockiG, BeinB, ScholzJ, DorgesV. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2010; 27(1):24–30.
46.
SiuLW, MathiesonE, NaikVN, ChandraD, JooHS. Patient- and operator-related factors associated with successful Glidescope intubations: a prospective observational study in 742 patients. Anaesth Intensive Care; 38(1):70–75.
47.
Nouruzi-SedehP, SchumannM, GroebenH. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology, 2009; 110(1):32–37.
48.
Platts-MillsTF, CampagneD, ChinnockB, SnowdenB, GlickmanLT, HendeyGW. A comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med, 2009; 16(9):866–871.
49.
NakstadAR, SandbergM. The GlideScope Ranger video laryngoscope can be useful in airway management of entrapped patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2009; 53(10):1257–1261.
50.
van ZundertA, MaassenR, LeeR, WillemsR, TimmermanM, SiemonsmaM, et al. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways. Anesth Analg, 2009; 109(3):825–831.
51.
MaassenR, LeeR, HermansB, MarcusM, van ZundertA. A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg, 2009; 109(5):1560–1565.
52.
SaxenaS. The ASA difficult airway algorithm: is it time to include video laryngoscopy and discourage blind and multiple intubation attempts in the nonemergency pathway?. Anesth Analg, 2009; 108(3):1052.
