Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Blood gas quality control (QC) is an essential and mandatory part of a laboratory’s quality plan. The acceptable QC range should be 2 SD from the mean value. The use of assayed QC material does not negate the responsibility of the laboratory to calculate the mean and 2 SD ranges of QC measurements for verification. Verifying assayed QC ranges is a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) requirement. This study shows the results of assayed QC mean and 2 SD range verification from a blood gas analyzer.
METHODS:
QC data from a blood gas analyzer were compared to manufacturer-provided mean and ranges. The percent difference between the measured mean and the manufacturer-provided mean was calculated to assess agreement. The measured SD was used to determine how many SD the manufacturer-provided ranges were from the measured mean.
RESULTS:
The largest difference in mean values was 2.27% > the manufacturer-provided mean. Forty-eight percent of all mean value comparisons showed a difference of 0%, and 71% were < 1%. The manufacturer-provided ranges were considerably wider than the measured 2 SD range, ranging from 2.4–75 SD. None of the manufacturer-provided ranges were deemed acceptable for clinical use.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our analysis validates the CLIA mandate and American Association for Respiratory Care Clinical Practice Guideline recommendation that laboratories must verify manufacturer-provided QC means and ranges and adjust QC means and ranges to match the performance of their blood gas analyzer.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.