Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the recommended ventilatory support for acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) associated with acute respiratory failure or hypercapnia. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has emerged as an alternative to NIV in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. We aimed to assess the efficacy of HFNC on early changes in
METHODS:
We conducted a prospective observational study in consecutive emergency department patients with acute hypercapnic CPE. Subjects received either HFNC or NIV, according to the attending emergency physician's expertise in HFNC. The primary outcome was change in
RESULTS:
Twenty-seven subjects with a discharge diagnosis of hypercapnic CPE were analyzed. Subjects had a median age of 87 y (interquartile range [IQR] 78–93); 37% were male. Twelve (44%) received HFNC, and 15 (56%) received NIV. Median of changes in
CONCLUSIONS:
This preliminary study suggests that HFNC treatment for 1 h improves
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
