Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Some technologists worry that patients with very severe lung disease are unable to complete several spirometry maneuvers, which require considerable effort.
METHODS:
We retrospectively selected all spirometry tests with an FEV1 < 35% predicted done by adult subjects sent to our pulmonary function laboratory during a 3-y period. We determined the rates and correlates of poor quality test sessions.
RESULTS:
Approximately 90% of the tests done by the 558 subjects with very severe lung-function impairment (of > 30,000 subjects tested during the 3-y period) had adequate quality spirometry. Subjects with airway obstruction were less likely to meet FVC repeatability goals. A poor spirometry quality grade was associated with a very low FVC and a low body mass index, but not older age.
CONCLUSIONS:
Severe lung disease should not be used as an excuse for not meeting spirometry quality goals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
