FullerHD, DolovichMB, PosmituckG, PackWW, NewhouseMT. Pressurized aerosol versus jet aerosol delivery to mechanically ventilated patients. Comparison of dose to the lungs. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1990; 141(2):440-444.
2.
BerlinskiA, WillisJR. Aerosol delivery by 4 different nebulizers placed in 4 different positions in a pediatric ventilator in-vitro model. Respir Care, 2013; 58(7):1124-1133.
3.
MacIntyreNR, SilverRM, MillerCW, SchulerF, ColemanRE. Aerosol delivery in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med, 1985; 13(2):81-84.
4.
DhandR, SohalH. Pulmonary drug delivery system for inhalation therapy in mechanically ventilated patients. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2008; 5(1):9-18.
5.
MillerDD, AminMM, PalmerLB, ShahAR, SmaldoneGC. Aerosol delivery and modern mechanical ventilation: in vitro/in vivo evaluation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2003; 168(10):1205-1209.
6.
AriA, AtalayOT, HarwoodR, SheardMM, AljamhanEA, FinkJB. Influence of nebulizer type, position, and bias flow on aerosol drug delivery in simulated pediatric and adult lung models during mechanical ventilation. Respir Care, 2010; 55(7):845-851.
7.
AriA, AreabiH, FinkJB. Evaluation of aerosol generator devices at 3 locations in humidified and non-humidified circuits during adult mechanical ventilation. Respir Care, 2010; 55(7):837-844.
8.
HughesJ, SaezJ. Effects of nebulizer mode and position in a mechanical ventilator circuit on dose efficiency. Respir Care, 1987; 32(12):1131-1135.
9.
QuinnW. Effect of a new nebulizer position on aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation. Respir Care, 1992; 37(5):423-431.
10.
FinkJB. Humidity and aerosol therapy. In: Mosby's Respir Care Equipment. St Louis: Mosby-Elsevier; 2010:91-140.
11.
FinkJB. Aerosol drug therapy. In: Egan's Fundamentals of Respir Care, 9th edition. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2009:801-842.
12.
DhandR. Nebulizers that use a vibrating mesh or plate with multiple apertures to generate aerosol. Respir Care, 2002; 47(12):1406-1416.
